Is John your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or contact
the profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Minimum acceptable sources would be official birth record and either consensus or marriage record. It is really hard for other editors to verify the data as this and descendant entries are missing adequate context to search official records.
Sources are needed to support this profile. The claimed connection to Sawyer-238 as the father is not credible.
It is not plausible that John Sawyer, born in 1705, was a son of Thomas Sawyer who was 89 years old in 1705, had a much older son named John, and whose life has been fairly extensively researched. The only source supplied for this profile is an SAR application, which is essentially only an unsourced excerpt from a family tree -- and is not an acceptable source for this time period.
It is not plausible that John Sawyer, born in 1705, was a son of Thomas Sawyer who was 89 years old in 1705, had a much older son named John, and whose life has been fairly extensively researched. The only source supplied for this profile is an SAR application, which is essentially only an unsourced excerpt from a family tree -- and is not an acceptable source for this time period.