William Scott
Privacy Level: Open (White)

William Scott (1633 - 1718)

William Scott
Born in Englandmap
Son of [father unknown] and [mother unknown]
[sibling(s) unknown]
Husband of — married 28 Jan 1670 in Hatfield, Hampshire, Massachusetts Baymap
Descendants descendants
Died at about age 85 in Hatfield, Hampshire, Massachusetts Baymap
Problems/Questions Profile manager: V Pounders private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 10 Sep 2010
This page has been accessed 3,335 times.

Contents

Biography

He was NOT a son of Benjamin Scott and Margaret Stevenson!!! There is no record anywhere showing that they had a son named William!!

Questionable parentage of William Scott: http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/read/SCOTT/2002-09/1032025366 SCOTT-L Archives Archiver > SCOTT > 2002-09 > 1032025366 From: BJCOD@aol.com Subject: Re: [SCOTT] Benjamin and Margaret (Stevenson) Scott Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2002 13:42:46 EDT This e-mail repeats a common error in identifying William Scott's parents as Benjamin and Margaret (Stephenson) Scott and probably mixes the records of two Benjamin Scotts. Benjamin Scott of Braintree MA was born in 1612 in England, married Hannah ? (possibly Chaffor), and had at least four children: John, Peter, Benjamin, and Hannah. Benjamin died in 1654 and left a will (in Suffolk County MA probate records) that makes no mention of a son William or any descendants of such a person. Benjamin Scott of Rowley MA married Margaret Stephenson (possibly in 1634) and had at least seven children: Joseph, Benjamin, John, Elizabeth, Mary, Samuel, and Sarah. Benjamin died about July 1671 and left a will (in Essex County MA probate records) that makes no mention of a son William or any descendants of such a person.Since William Scott of Hatfield MA did not die until at least 1716, the fact that he was not mentioned in the will of either Benjamin pretty much rules out a father-son relationship. It is also noteworthy that none of William Scott's ten children is named Benjamin or Margaret.While an Edward Scott was married in Hadley MA in 1670 and a John Scott was married in Springfield MA in 1659, no linkage to William Scott in nearby Hatfield MA has been found. Over 330 years after William Scott first appeared in the records of Hatfield MA, his parentage and relationship to other Scotts in MA remain a mystery.

It is better that no name be put in if the parentage is not sure! leave it blank!!


The more I work on this family the more I believe that John Scott about 1635 – 3 January 1689 • LT4T-R78 was either a brother or a cousin https://www.familysearch.org/tree/person/details/LT4T-R78

And that Sarah Ann Scott 1595 – 17 December 1666 • LVXV-QRS who married Thomas Graves 19 October 1598 – 11 November 1662 • LJ22-2XL may have been their aunt. https://www.familysearch.org/tree/person/details/LVXV-QRS

Marriage:
Date: 28 JUL 1642
Place: Rowley, Essex, Massachusetts, USA
Source: #S43

Death

Death:
Date: 15 JAN 1717
Place: Hatfield, Hampshire, Massachusetts, USA
Source: #S43
Page: Database online.
Data:
Text: Record for Benjamin Scott

Death

Death:
Date: 15 Jan 1717
Place: Hatfield, Hampshire, Massachusetts, USA[1][2]

Marriage

Husband: William Scott
Wife: Hannah Allis
Child: Mary Scott
Child: Josiah Scott
Child: Richard Scott
Child: William Scott
Child: Hannah Scott
Child: Joseph Scott
Child: John Scott
Child: Mehitable Scott
Child: Abigail Scott
Marriage: 28 Jan 1670 Hatfield, Hampshire, Massachusetts, United States[3][4][5][6][7][8]


Sources

  1. Source: #S-2083069892 Page: Birth year: 1649; Birth city: Hatfield; Birth state: MA. Note: http://trees.ancestry.com/rd?f=sse&db=genepool&h=4705953&ti=0&indiv=try&gss=pt Note: Data: Text: Birth date: 1649 Birth place: Hatfield, Hampshire, MA Death date: 1718 Death place: Hatfield, Hampshire, MA APID: 1,4725::4705953
  2. Source: #S-2083087492 Note: http://trees.ancestry.com/rd?f=sse&db=millind&h=10232699&ti=0&indiv=try&gss=pt Note: Data: Text: Birth date: 1649 Birth place: Hatfield, Hampshire, Massachusetts, USA Death date: 1718 Death place: Hatfield, Hampshire, Massachusetts, USA APID: 1,7249::10232699
  3. Source: #S-2093213581 Note: http://trees.ancestry.com/rd?f=sse&db=amr-1699&h=200&ti=0&indiv=try&gss=pt Note: Data: Text: Marriage date: 28 January 1670 Marriage place: Hatfield, Mass. APID: 1,2081::200
  4. Source: #S-2093213581 Note: http://trees.ancestry.com/rd?f=sse&db=amr-1699&h=7769&ti=0&indiv=try&gss=pt Note: Data: Text: Marriage date: 28 January 1670 Marriage place: Hatfield, Mass. APID: 1,2081::7769
  5. Source: #S-2083067515 Page: Source number: 6034.000; Source type: Electronic Database; Number of Pages: 1; Submitter Code: JDM. Note: http://trees.ancestry.com/rd?f=sse&db=worldmarr_ga&h=1073182&ti=0&indiv=try&gss=pt Note: Data: Text: Birth date: 1655 Birth place: MA Marriage date: 1670 Marriage place: APID: 1,7836::1073182
  6. Source: #S-2083069892 Page: Birth year: 1654; Birth city: Braintree; Birth state: MA. Note: http://trees.ancestry.com/rd?f=sse&db=genepool&h=2993009&ti=0&indiv=try&gss=pt Note: Data: Text: Birth date: 28 January 1654 Birth place: Braintree, Essex, MA Death date: 1718 Death place: Hatfield, Hampshire, MA Marriage date: 28 January 1670 Marriage place: Hatfield, Hampshire, MA APID: 1,4725::2993009
  7. Source: #S-2083069892 Page: Birth year: 1654; Birth city: Braintree; Birth state: MA. Note: http://trees.ancestry.com/rd?f=sse&db=genepool&h=41353&ti=0&indiv=try&gss=pt Note: Data: Text: Birth date: 28 January 1654 Birth place: Braintree, Essex, MA Death date: 1718 Death place: Hatfield, Hampshire, MA Marriage date: 28 January 1670 Marriage place: Hatfield, Hampshire, MA APID: 1,4725::41353
  8. Source: #S-2083067515 Page: Source number: 6034.000; Source type: Electronic Database; Number of Pages: 1; Submitter Code: JDM. Note: http://trees.ancestry.com/rd?f=sse&db=worldmarr_ga&h=18305&ti=0&indiv=try&gss=pt Note: Data: Text: Birth date: 1654 Birth place: MA Marriage date: 1670 Marriage place: APID: 1,7836::18305

http://www.geneajourney.com/scottinfo.html

Clifton William Scott and Mildred Evelyn Bradford Scott of Ashfield, Mass ... https://books.google.ca/books?id=zsYY4RDnAGcC&pg=PA42&lpg=PA42&dq= benjamin+scott+of+braintree+ma&source= bl&ots=YnL02Vm71c&sig= q038CZWRNwvwNUk1ycktkFf6cnk&hl= en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwict8y1i8raAhVkiOAKHT8aCTM4ChDoAQg-MAQ#v=onepage&q= benjamin%20scott%20of%20braintree%20ma&f=false





Is William your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message the profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with William by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known yDNA or mtDNA test-takers in his direct paternal or maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with William:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 3

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
If William Scott Sr. was not related to Benjamin Scott Sr. than how come my DNA proves direct lines that directly tie to him ? I'm sorry but there has to be a tie from WILLIAM SCOTT SR TO BENJAMIN SCOTT SR. otherwise I wouldn't be here technically !!!
posted by Robert Scott Jr
The researcher states that William's Scott senior's parents are unkown. Since Benjamin has no recorded children with the name William, that makes sense. I can with a high level of certainty, directly link the following: My son is James, I am Jeffrey, my father is Oliver, then: Phillip, Jay, Jedidiah, Phillip, Dr. Philip, Abasalom, William Junior, William senior. From there the trail is cold. We know from the grave stone that he was born in 1633. The first Scott did not come to Massachusetts much before then. (Benjamin arrived in 1632. He was one of if not the first. ) This highly increases the chances that William was born in England, but does not guarantee it. Was William a bastard? Possibly not. Here some possibilities: Record not found yet. Records destroyed. Birth never recorded. Orphaned and adopted but kept the last name. Parents killed in transit, plague there or while over here. We may never know.

William did live along time. That means he had money for keeping up good nutrition and descent housing, as well as good genes. His family plot lends to this idea. He married later in years. Did he have a previous wife? Perhaps in England? The more learned about Hannah may also lead to better understanding. What was the social station of her parents? To me, it sounds like he maybe is remarrying.

posted by Jeff Scott
edited by Jeff Scott
This man does not belong to these parents
posted by [Living Hudnall]

S  >  Scott  >  William Scott