"The manuscript Sherwood Genealogy suggests that Nathan of Stamford was son of Lemuel by his first wife. Proof of this has not been found. Nathan had no deeds at Fairfield. His first purchase at Stamford, 28 Jul 1727, calls him of Fairfield. He m. by 1730 Ann Pettit, dau of John, b 27 Apr 1708. They had eleven children recorded at Stamford, two of who were named Matthew and Lemuel, name that occur in this brand of the family.
Year: 1790; Census Place: Ridgefield, Fairfield, Connecticut; Series: M637; Roll: 1; Page: 296; Image: 302; Family History Library Film: 0568141
Year: 1800; Census Place: Stamford, Fairfield, Connecticut; Series: M32; Roll: 1; Page: 228; Image: 124; Family History Library Film: 205618
Connecticut, Church Record Abstracts, 1630-1920
Source number: 547.000; Source type: Electronic Database; Number of Pages: 1; Submitter Code: BS
U.S. City Directories, 1822-1995
The National Archives; Washington, D.C.; Ledgers of Payments, 1818-1872, to U.S. Pensioners Under Acts of 1818 Through 1858 From Records of the Office of the Third Auditor of the Treasury; Record Group Title: Records of the Accounting Officers of the Department
Is Nathan your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or contact
the profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Nathan by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known yDNA or mtDNA test-takers in his direct paternal or maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Nathan: