According to some, while visiting her daughter in 1862, Susan died in Kentucky and was buried at Bowling-Bald Point Cemetery in, Leslie County, Kentucky, USA. [1] with her daughter Sylvainia (Sizemore) Mosley and son-in-law, Granville Mosley. It has been said that the reason she is buried so high on the mountain is so "she could be close to her God" per Walter Sizemore and Ralph Howard.[citation needed]
Why would she have a daughter with the maiden name Sizemore?
We seek evidence for all of the unsourced information above.
Research Notes
It is not clear if any of the following has anything to do with THIS Susan Sizemore Bowling/Bolling:
In 1840, a Susan Bowling (age btw 70-80, suggesting born btw 1760-1770) was enumerated as head of household, with no other residents in the home, in Hart Co., Kentucky. Enumerated on the same page are three other Bowling families-- possibly her children:[2]
W.B. Bowling, b btw 1790-1800
G.W. Bowling, b btw 1800-1810
J.W. Bowling, b btw 1800-1810
In 1850, a Susan Bowling, 86, (b 1774) VA, was enumerated as head of household in Clay Co., Kentucky with [offspring or grandchildren? ] Stokes/Stokely Bolling (23), John (17), and Ashley (11).[3]
In 1860, a Susan Boling, 86, was enumerated in the home of Stokes/Stokely Bolling, 28, in Perry Co., Kentucky.[4].
Sources
↑ Find A Grave: Memorial #152746234 for Susan (Sizemore) Bowling, b: 1784 USA; d: 1862 Perry County, Kentucky, USA; buried: Bowling-Bald Point Cemetery, Leslie County, Kentucky, USA; grave marked by a fieldstone; with personal & gravestone photos
Is Susan your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or
contact
a profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Susan by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Susan:
With such a lack of citations (URL address) for the line sources (which need citations) and a liminted number of line sources indicating perhaps a more intensive search could be profitable ... it would be hard to form an opinion based on what has been presented so far - and in fact the only "evidence" is the find a grave ... has no one thought to search the familysearch.org archives?
There's a biog on their son, bookhiker.com/2022/02/25/elijah-bowling-jr/ Elijah Bowling Feb 1828 to Feb 1908, comes with census also - 1850 onward of Breathitt County, Kentucky Federal Census
Well someone has been busy 😀 and added citations from Ancestry.com. I prefer familysearch.org myself since the material is freely accessible and there is no requirement for a membership fee. But we all have our preferences.
There's a 5-person committee for this profile, and the persons editing recenly are not members in that committee. Three committe members are recently active in 2023, if not on this profile.
AND my silver lining is I now have the template for "citations needed".
So whatever the causes and cures of this one profile, there has been some improvement in at least this one profile. Gotta be seen as a plus.❤
Well, I wouldn't think of it as a "committee". When profiles merge, every Profile Manager keeps getting added to the merged profile. It doesn't mean that everyone is an active Profile Manager. WT is a collaborative platform. If you think something needs changed, then go ahead and do it. Just source your work and all is good.
I've been working on it, adding sources from FamilySearch.org, but the more I work on it, the more uncertain I am that what I found has anything to do with THIS Susan (supposedly Sizemore) Bowling/Bolling.
Unfortunately, the original question remains unanswered: What evidence supports Susan, wife of Bowling being a Sizemore or daughter of George Sizemore of Kentucky?
Well, if you are still up to it, have the time, you might be able to find something. Whether pro or con or both, ay out your arguments about this.
You've been a WikiTreer for some time and have excellent skills, so this should not be difficult for you. I'm going back to what I was doing before I interrupted myself with this.
Susan, you put words in my mouth I did not say, with a tone that was uncalled for.
My point is that there are many instances where people are listed as a Profile Manager where they don't contribute any work to the profile. Characterizing the group of Profile Managers as some group that consistently collaborates on managing the work on a profile may not be a good metaphor to use.
My other statement still stands: If someone wants to see improvements on a profile, then go ahead and make them.
That is good to know, forced me to open to Edit and try to discern what was there in the crowd of text. And you are correct that it is not citations from Ancestry.com
There's a biog on their son, bookhiker.com/2022/02/25/elijah-bowling-jr/ Elijah Bowling Feb 1828 to Feb 1908, comes with census also - 1850 onward of Breathitt County, Kentucky Federal Census
The blog you link to is for an Elijah Bowling, son of Elijah Bowling Sr and Susannah Roberts.
Different couple.
There's a 5-person committee for this profile, and the persons editing recenly are not members in that committee. Three committe members are recently active in 2023, if not on this profile.
AND my silver lining is I now have the template for "citations needed".
So whatever the causes and cures of this one profile, there has been some improvement in at least this one profile. Gotta be seen as a plus.❤
deleted by Susan Smith
flagged by Eric Weddington
You've been a WikiTreer for some time and have excellent skills, so this should not be difficult for you. I'm going back to what I was doing before I interrupted myself with this.
edited by Susan Smith
My point is that there are many instances where people are listed as a Profile Manager where they don't contribute any work to the profile. Characterizing the group of Profile Managers as some group that consistently collaborates on managing the work on a profile may not be a good metaphor to use.
My other statement still stands: If someone wants to see improvements on a profile, then go ahead and make them.
flagged by Susan Smith
No sources listed for this one . Looking for more ....