1790 Census: Job Smith [John Smith]
Home in 1790 (City, County, State): Pendleton, South Carolina
Free White Persons - Males - Under 16: 3
Free White Persons - Males - 16 and over: 2
Free White Persons - Females: 5
Number of Household Members: 10
[1]
1800 Census: Name: Job Smith
Home in 1800 (City, County, State): Pendleton District, South Carolina
Free White Persons - Males - Under 10: 2
Free White Persons - Males - 16 thru 25: 2
Free White Persons - Males - 26 thru 44: 1
Free White Persons - Females - Under 10: 1
Free White Persons - Females - 10 thru 15: 4
Free White Persons - Females - 45 and over: 1
Number of Household Members Under 16: 7
Number of Household Members Over 25: 2
Number of Household Members: 11
[2]
Sources
ā Ancestry.com, 1790 United States Federal Census (Provo, UT, USA: The Generations Network, Inc., 2000), www.ancestry.com, Ancestry.com, 2000. Not Stated, Pendleton, South Carolina, roll M637_11, page , image 0017.
ā Year: 1800; Census Place: Pendleton District, South Carolina; Series: M32; Roll: 50; Page: 118; Image: 235; Family History Library Film: 181425
Ancestors and Descendants of Smiths by Linda G. Clark, 1987. ISBN 0-89308-622-3. Page 151 (I will do look-ups in this book by request. Kitty Smith)
Research Notes
Anita Quarles lists Job, Sr's sons as Benjamin, John , James, David and Job, Jr.
Is Job your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or contact
the profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Job by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA.
Y-chromosome DNA test-takers in his direct paternal line on WikiTree:
I believe there are misplaced wives attached to this person. Anita Quarles is just not a name known in "North America" in the 1700's. See the comment section of Quarles-47. Searching for Sarah Downs in association with Job turned up nothing. She may be this Sarah Downs.
Smith-90657 and Smith-13705 appear to represent the same person because: Same birth date , 90657 shows 13705 as son. 13705 has parents that seem right generation. There are some other duplicate relationships downline that need a look.