no image

1776 Regiments Table, New Hampshire

Privacy Level: Public (Green)
Date: 1775 to 1784
Location: New Hampshiremap
Profile manager: Dana Burns private message [send private message]
This page has been accessed 711 times.

New Hampshire Revolutionary Regiments Table

Purpose

This page contains a table of New Hampshire American Revolutionary War Regiments with their commanders spanning the timeframe of the war, which should help people find the most appropriate unit category for their profile if they know a commander's name or regiment number and timeframe. The implied orderliness of the table does not reflect the relative chaos of the time. Please find a detailed explanation below.

Table

Regiments Table
Origins New Hampshire (1775) "of Foot" 1776 Continental New Hampshire (1777) 1778 1780 1781 1783 1784
1st Stark 7th 5th Stark 1st Stark,Cilley *SC, Dearborn *CD *NH Reid disbanded
2nd 2nd Poor 11th 8th Poor 2nd Poor,N.Hale *PH, Reid *HR *NH Reid disbanded
3rd 3rd Reed 3rd 2nd Reed,Gilman *RG 3rd Scammell Dearborn *SD disbanded
Origins 1775 Extra 1776 1777 1778 1780 1781 1783 1784
Long Long disbanded
Origins 1775 Rangers 1776 1777 1778 1780 1781 1783 1784
r 1st Bedel Bedel disbanded
r 2nd Russell Russell
r Whitcomb Whitcomb disbanded
Origins 1775 Militia 1776 1777 1778 1780 1781 1783 1784
m 1st Whipple
m 2nd Evans 2nd Drake disbanded
m 3rd Moulton
m 4th Gilman 4th Evans disbanded
m 5th Webster 5th Nichols RI West Point
m 6th Thornton 6th Ashley 6th Ashley 6th Ashley
m 7th Bartlett
m 8th Nichols
m 9th Moore 9th Moore disbanded
m 10th Badger 10th Welch disbanded
m 11th Stickney 11th Stickney disbanded
m 12th Hobart 12th Hobart disbanded
m 13th Ashley 13th Chase disbanded
m 14th E.Hale
m 15th Bellows 15th E.Hale RI
m 16th Morey 16th Bellows disbanded
m 17th Chase
m Peabody Peabody
m Gale Gale
m Stark Stark
Tash Tash
Baldwin Baldwin
Pending Wyman
Pending Wingate
Pending Gilman
Pending Waldron

Columns Key

Each column represents a time period of the war:

  • Origins - notes regarding the unit's origins
  • 1775 - New Hampshire (1775) - Spring 1775:[1] the regiments were first named as New Hampshire Regiments. For the first 3 regiments that would become Continental Army units, the Wikitree Categories include "New Hampshire Regiment (1775), Continental Army, American Revolution"
  • "of Foot" - the numerical "Regiment of Foot" that Washington designated starting in August, 1775. "Extra" units were those Continental Army units raised after the numbered units for specific purposes and are named by their commander. "Rangers" are a special type of extra unit, responsible for defending a wide range of geography. "Militia" units were those units raised by New Hampshire and are not considered Continental Army, but were sometimes "called up" to reinforce the army for periods of time, and are listed separately at the bottom.
  • 1776 - 1776 Continental - 1776 reorganization of regiments into Continental Army units. For Continental Army units, the Wikitree Category names include "Continental Regiment, Continental Army, American Revolution"
  • New Hampshire (1777) - another reorganization, with "New Hampshire" returning to the names. *SP 14:551 For Continental Army units, the Wikitree Category names include "New Hampshire Regiment (1777), Continental Army, American Revolution" (with one having 1780 in parenthesis).
  • 1781 - The 3rd was disbanded, with remnants joining the others
  • 1783 - March: consolidation of regiments into one "New Hampshire Regiment"
  • 1784 - The New Hampshire Regiment was disbanded

Cell Contents

The numerical designation, where it appears as a link, is a link to the Category, which should include more detail on that specific regiment during the appropriate time frame. The commander's surname, if linked, takes you to that commander's profile, which may include more detail. Footnotes appear as needed to help keep the table concise. Click on it to take you to the explanation below.

Rows

Units appearing in the same row represent general transitions of a more or less cohesive unit changes name or command.

Detailed Explanation

Determining the best unit to use for the 1776 Sticker template can be quite confusing, since regiments can be named numerically or by a commander's surname, or both at the same time, and this changes over time. Things to keep in mind when trying to understand and use this table:

It should be noted that New Hampshire has some attributes with relation to the American Revolution that distinguishes itself from the other Colonies. The Massachusetts Regiments table concerns itself with the many regiments that would become Continental Army units, and so far only touches on the Militia units. For New Hampshire, we should consider not only the regiments early on that would become part of the Continental Army, of which there were only 3 with at least one other enlisting later on, and the many militia units, many of which were called upon to reinforce the main army in particular engagements, but also "ranger" units. While prepared in many ways for the conflict that would come, there was no New Hampshire military organized at the state level when hostilities broke out. As a result, many New Hampshire men made there way to Massachusetts upon hearing the alarm of April 19, 1775 and took part in the Siege of Boston, joining up with Massachusetts units. In fact, it is said that there were more soldiers fighting the British at the Battle of Bunker Hill from New Hampshire than from Massachusetts, and that much of the arms and powder used came from a supply seized at the Fort of William & Mary in 1774 by New Hampshire Militia.


Sources

  1. NH State Papers vol. 14, p. 38
  • Wright, Robert K., Jr., 1946-. The Continental Army. Washington, D.C.: Center of Military History, U.S. Army , 1983.
  • Derby, Samuel Carroll; Early Dublin : a list of the Revolutionary soldiers of Dublin, N.H.; 1901, Columbus, Ohio : Press of Spahr & Glenn; p. 13 May 17, 1775, 17 districts

Development Notes

These are all "to-do" items, roughly in order of priority:





Collaboration


Comments

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.