Dorking parish in Victoria County History

Profile

Images

Date: [unknown] [unknown]
Location: [unknown]

Profile manager: Stephen Adey

[send private message]

This page has been accessed 29 times.

'Parishes: Dorking', in A History of the County of Surrey: Volume 3, ed. H E Malden (London, 1911), pp. 141-150. British History Online http://www.british-history.ac.uk/vch/surrey/vol3/pp141-150 [accessed 2 January 2021].

This profile is part of the Dorking, Surrey One Place Study.

1 DORKING
- 1.1 MANORS
- 1.2 Footnotes
2 Sources

DORKING

Dorchinges (xi cent.); Dorkinges (xiii cent.); Dorking (xviii cent.).

Dorking is a market town 23½ miles south-west of London, 12 miles east of Guildford. The market was claimed by the Earl of Warenne and Surrey^[1] in 1278 as of immemorial antiquity. (fn. 1) The parish is bounded on the north by the two Bookhams and Mickleham, on the east by Betchworth, on the south by Capel, on the west by Wotton. It contains 1,329 acres of land and 10 of water, and is about 5 miles from north to south and 4 from east to west, but is slightly narrower towards the south. Capel, which lies south of it, was anciently part of the parish, and for the most part of the manor. The parish extends over the usual succession of soils in this part of Surrey. The northern part is on the chalk downs, partly capped by gravel and sand. The town and church are on the sand, the southern part is on the Wealden clay.

From the high chalk down about Denbies, and from Ranmore Common on the north-west border of the parish, the views are beautiful and extensive. Between the spectator and the steep side of Box Hill, immediately to the east, the transverse valley of the Mole runs through the chalk range. Southward lies Dorking in the valley between the chalk and the well wooded sand hills, which rise to the fir-tree clad heights of Redlands Wood, and to Anstiebury and Leith Hill beyond. The lower ground of the Weald, thickly wooded, extends south-eastwards, and the horizon is marked by the South Downs near Lewes. The boundary of the sand and the clay runs north and south for some way on the southern side of Dorking. The Redlands Woods are a steep sand ridge of north and south direction covered with fir trees, with a silver fir, (fn. 2) probably the tallest tree in the county, standing up above them all, while east of it extends the Holmwood Common, a high open common on the clay, thickly studded with hollies and furze bushes, with occasional houses dotted about it. The Glory Woods, a favourite resort of Dorking people, are on the sand hills nearer to the town. There is a small common close to the town called Cotmandene, formerly famous as the cricket ground where the great Dorking players, who did so much for the Surrey eleven, were trained. Caffyn^[2], who first taught scientific cricket to the Australians, was one of them, and Jupp^[3] and the two Humphreys^[4]^[5] were among the last. Milton Heath is another common west of Dorking. Towards the high ground of the Leith Hill range parts of Broad Moor, Coldharbour Common, and the plantation called the Warren are in Dorking parish.

The parish was divided into six tithings called Boroughs; namely, East Borough, including West Betchworth, at the east end of the town; Chipping Borough, the body of the town, a name which justifies the Earl of Warenne's claim to an ancient market; Milton Borough, lying west; Westcote Borough, still farther west and south-west; Holmwood Borough, to the south; and Walde or Wold or Wale Borough, farther south still, but now known as Capel parish, and distinct from Dorking. (fn. 3) But in the 14th and 15th centuries, when Milton and Westcote were separate manors, both the views of frankpledge held in Dorking recognized the Chipping Borough, East Borough, Waldeborough, and Forreyn Borough only as tithings. (fn. 4) The names are the same in the view of frankpledge of 7 October 1597, but on 27 September 1598 the names are changed to Chipping Borough, East Borough, Capel and Homewood Borough. The last therefore answers to Forreyn Borough, as also appears by local names in the latter tithing.

The town is administered as an urban district under the Local Government Act of 1894^[6], which superseded a local board established in 1881. The Act of 1894 separated the urban district from Dorking rural parish, which is administered by a rural parish council.

The parish is almost entirely residential and agricultural. But there are lime works on the chalk, though not so extensive as those in neighbouring parishes, a little brick-making, water-mills (corn) at Pixham Mill, and timber and saw-mills.

Poultry rearing is an ancient pursuit of the neighbourhood, and the Dorking fowls^[7] with an extra claw are a well-known breed, which it is not necessary to derive from Roman introduction.

Sand of fine texture and often in veins of pink colour is also dug about Dorking, and some extensive caverns were formerly excavated for this purpose under parts of the present town.

The road from London to Horsham passes through Dorking, and continues over the Holmwood Common. This is the turnpike which was made in 1755 (fn. 5) in response to the astounding statement of the people of Horsham that if they wanted to drive to London they were compelled to go round to Canterbury. Arthur Young justly described it as the worst instance of the want of communication which he had heard of in England. (fn. 6) The Act was for the making of a road from Epsom, through Letherhead, Dorking, and Capel, with a branch to Ockley. The old road from Dorking into Sussex went up Boar Hill to Coldharbour, and down to Ockley. (fn. 7) This road was impassable for wheeled traffic as late as the earlier part of the 19th century, when it was such a narrow ravine that bearers carrying a coffin had to walk in single file with the coffin slung on a pole. It was repaired about 1830, chiefly at the instance of Mr. Serjeant Heath^[8] of Kitlands, Capel, who threatened to prosecute the parish. The road from Reigate to Guildford passes through Dorking from east to west.

The South Eastern Railway, Redhill and Reading branch, has two stations in Dorking, Box Hill and Dorking, opened in 1849. In 1867 the London Brighton and South Coast Railway, Portsmouth branch, was brought through Dorking, where there is a station near the Box Hill station of the South Eastern Railway.

The ancient road called Stone Street (see in Ockley on the name) ran through Dorking. It is to be traced in much of its course by flint pavement which is found in draining and field work. It is laid down fairly correctly upon the Ordnance Map. It enters Dorking parish close to Anstie Grange Home Farm (not to be confounded with Anstie Farm), and runs along the side of the hill under the Redlands Woods, and above the Holmwood Common. Folly Farm lies just west of it. Near Dorking it has not been accurately observed, but it has no relation to the direction of the streets. Drainage operations show that it left South Street to the east, and crossed West Street just opposite the yard occupied by Messrs. Stone & Turner; a foot passage opposite their premises is just on the line. It continued in a straight line for Pebble Lane, where there is little doubt that it mounted to the chalk hills, and is represented still by the old bridle way over Mickleham Downs to Epsom race-course; it must have left Dorking Church to the south-east. Manning and Bray (fn. 8) say that the flints were found north-east of the church in a nursery garden, and sold to the road surveyor. But the description is vague and not incompatible with its having passed the church as described. It has not been traced in the north part of Dorking parish.

The prehistoric fortified hill of Anstiebury, formerly in Dorking parish, was included in Capel by the Local Government Act of 1894, and has been described under Capel.

There is a barrow, unopened apparently, on Milton Heath, north of the road. Camden says that Roman coins were found in Dorking churchyard, and others have been mentioned. In 1817 a find of 700 Anglo-Saxon coins was made in Winterfold Hanger, on Lower Merriden Farm, west of Redlands Wood. (fn. 9)

The town of Dorking used to consist of many houses of respectable antiquity, but has been much modernized of late. The 'Old King's Head' is a fine brick Jacobean building, standing at the west end of the High Street, on the north side. It used to be called the 'Chequers,' and received its later name in 1660. The licence was withdrawn about 1800, renewed about 1850, and is now again withdrawn. It is usually said to be the original of Dickens'^[9] 'Marquis of Granby,' but at the time when the Pickwick Papers were written it was not an inn at all. Opposite the 'Old King's Head,' just before High Street divides into West Street and South Street, was the old 'Bull Ring.'

A few old houses are to be found in the High Street and side streets, but most of them have been re-fronted or otherwise modernized, and a comparison with the sister towns of Letherhead, Guildford, and Godalming, is in this respect very disappointing. In the town itself perhaps the most interesting old houses are the White Horse Inn—anciently the 'Cross House,' from its sign, the cross of the Knights of St. John, (fn. 10) a quaint, low structure largely of timber and plaster, with three gables, and a large courtyard opening from the High Street, probably on a very ancient site, and as it stands perhaps 400 years old. The town abounds in ancient hostelries of lesser size, such as the 'Red Lion' (originally 'The Cardinal's Cap') and the 'Black Horse,' and in the side streets are one or two small half-timber houses with overhanging upper stories.

The gallows used to stand on a hill called Gallows Hill on the left-hand side of the road going towards Coldharbour by way of Boar Hill. A house now occupies the spot. It is marked in the map of Ogilvy's^[10] Book of Roads. The parish registers of 1625 to 1669 record at intervals the burial of persons hanged there when the Assizes were held in the town.

The old market-house stood in the street opposite the 'Red Lion.' Pictures show a gabled, probably 16th-century building, of the same type as the Farnham market-house, but the original wooden supports had been changed for brick arches at the west end; they remained under the east end. It was demolished in 1813.

The market on Thursdays, claimed by John de Warenne^[11] in 1278, is still held on the spot in the street. There is a fair, also existing in 1278, on Ascension Day. Down to ten years ago the practice of Shrove Tuesday football continued in the streets of Dorking. Shop windows were barricaded, all business suspended, and the town given over to a very tumultuous game. When the practice became known through the papers as a curiosity surviving here, idle people came from a distance to assist. The nuisance, always great, was intolerable, and it was suppressed with some difficulty by the police. But the year 1907 is said to have been the first in which no attempt was made to continue it. In 1830 there was a very serious riot in Dorking during the Swing Riots^[12]. (fn. 11)

St. Joseph's Roman Catholic Church was rebuilt in 1895 chiefly at the expense of the Duke of Norfolk. The original temporary building had been erected by the Duchess of Norfolk^[13] in 1872. There is a Congregational chapel in West Street, representing an ancient congregation formed in 1662 under the Rev. James Fisher, the ejected minister of Fetcham, at whose house a small body of Nonconformists met in 1669, but the minister who was licensed in 1672 under the Indulgence was Mr. Feake^[14], a Fifth Monarchy man, who had been imprisoned under the Protectorate. There was a congregation of Presbyterians under the Rev. John Wood, late rector of North Chapel in Sussex^[15], meeting at his house. (fn. 12) This Presbyterian body does not seem to have survived, (fn. 13) but after the death of Mr. Wood at an advanced age in 1693, became merged in the Congregational body. A chapel was built in 1719. In 1834 this was pulled down and rebuilt, and much improved and altered in 1874. (fn. 14)

Congregational schools were built in 1858.

There is a Baptist chapel, built in 1869; and a Wesleyan chapel, built in 1850. Wesley^[16] made the first of ten visits here in 1764, and in 1772 opened a chapel in Church Street, now converted into cottages.

The Society of Friends were strong in the Dorking neighbourhood about the time of their foundation. Possibly the first meetings of the Friends in Surrey were held at the house of Thomas Bax^[17], in Capel, near Dorking. There had been a Friends' meeting at Bax's house for upwards of twenty years in 1677. (fn. 15) Fox^[18], however, records in his journal a meeting at Reigate in 1655, which may precede this. The Old Friends' Meeting House in West Street, Dorking, bore the date 1709. The present meeting house near Rose Hill was built in 1846.

There is a meeting of Plymouth Brethren in a chapel in Hampstead Road, opened in 1863.

The cemetery was opened in 1856.

The Public Hall in West Street was built by a company for meetings and entertainments in 1872.

Denbies is the residence of the Hon. Henry Cubitt^[19], the lord-lieutenant. It stands upon the brow of the chalk down, close to Ranmore Common and church. The church, however, is in Great Bookham parish (q.v.). Denbies commands fine views over the weald and the back of the Leith Hill range, and of Box Hill, which faces it from across the Mole Valley. Ashcombe, from which the peerage of Ashcombe is named, was a piece of land lying close to it, and Ashcombe Hill was the old name of the brow. Denby was probably a farmer who lived there. The farmhouse was bought in 1754 by Mr. Jonathan Tyers^[20], the founder of Vauxhall Gardens, who laid out the grounds in what was intended to be a style appealing to serious reflections, with a temple, two skulls, inscriptions and verses of the tombstone kind, much admired then and very absurd, a sort of Lenten Vauxhall. Mr. Tyers died in 1767, and the estate was sold to the Hon. Peter King^[21]. His son Lord King^[22] sold it in 1781 to Mr. James White, who sold it in 1787 to Mr. Denison, whose son William Joseph Denison^[23] was M.P. for West Surrey. After Mr. Denison's death in 1849 it was bought by Mr. Thomas Cubitt^[24], who built the present house. He was father to Lord Ashcombe^[25], the father of the present owner.

Cubitt. Checkered or and gules a pile argent with a lion's head razed sable thereon.

Bury Hill (in Westcote borough) is the seat of Mr. Robert Barclay^[26], representative of the ancient Scottish house of Barclay of Urie^[27]. The name is as old as the 14th century, (fn. 16) but no trace or record of a fortification can now be found. (fn. 17) The ground was part of the waste of the manor of Milton. Mr. James Walter was buying land in Milton Manor in 1753, (fn. 18) and he built the house then and planted the grounds. Mr. Walter^[28] died in 1780, when Viscount Grimston^[29], his daughter's husband, succeeded him here. In 1812 he sold it to Mr. Robert Barclay^[30] , great-grandfather of the present owner. The Nower, a favourite walk for Dorking people, is a hill adjoining this property.

Barclay. Azure a cheveron argent with three crosses formy argent in the chief.

The Rookery, the property of Mr. Brooke, is the seat of Mr. Lionel Bulteel. An estate here was bought in 1759 by Mr. David Malthus^[31], who built the house and laid out the grounds with the ponds and waterfalls, which make it a picturesque place. The Rev. Thomas Malthus^[32], the economist, his son, was born here in 1766. In 1768 it was bought by Mr. Richard Fuller^[33], banker, of London, of the family of the Fullers of Tandridge, Surrey (q.v.), and was sold by the executors of his great-grandson, Mr. George Fuller, in 1893. The old name of the valley where the Rookery stands was Chartgate, or Chartfield.

Milton Heath (in Milton borough), the seat of Mr. J. Carr Saunders, was built by the late Mr. James Powell, of the Whitefriars Glass Works^[34].

Deepdene (in Holmwood borough), lately the seat of Lilian, Duchess of Marlborough^[35], was originally built by the Hon. Charles Howard^[36], after coming into possession of a part of the manor in 1652. In 1655 Evelyn^[37] visited him, and admired the gardens which he had already begun to lay out in the deep valley which gives the place its name. It is probable that there was already a small house on the spot. Some thirty years later Aubrey saw and admired the landscape gardening, then evidently far more advanced. Mr. Howard died in 1713 (he was buried at Dorking, according to the inscription at Deepdene, in 1714); his son Henry Charles Howard^[38] died in 1720. His second son Charles^[39] succeeded as Duke of Norfolk in 1777 and rebuilt the house. His son Charles^[40], eleventh duke, sold it in 1791 to Sir William Burrell^[41], bart., whose son Sir Charles^[42] sold it in 1806 to Mr. Thomas Hope^[43]. Mr. Hope largely altered the house, and began the great collection of paintings and statuary carried on by his son, the late Mr. Beresford Hope^[44], who also added to the house and built the Italian south-western front.

Charte Park, formerly called the Vineyard, was the property of the Sondes or Sonds family, after they had parted with Sondes Place^[45]. (fn. 19) The late Mr. Beresford Hope^[46] bought Charte Park, and threw it into the grounds of Deepdene, pulling down the house.

Westcott, also spelt Westcote, and erroneously Westgate, is one of the Dorking boroughs (vide supra), and with Milton was made into an ecclesiastical parish in 1852 (vide infra). A considerable village existed before then, and many houses have since been built.

In Squire's Wood, south of Westcote, is Mag's Well, one of the sources of Pip Brook, which runs through Dorking to the Mole. It was formerly of some repute as a medicinal spring, and is strongly impregnated with iron. A building, now gone to ruin, existed over it, and within the writer's memory children still bathed in it.

Holmwood Borough was the ancient division of Dorking, to the south of the town. The ancient spelling in the Court Rolls is invariably Homewood, the numerous hollies have led to the change in the name. But as far back as 1329 the reeves' accounts include carriage of firewood from 'Dorkynge Ywode vel Homewode' to Kingston, where the distinction between the 'High Wood,' the skirts of the big forest of the Weald, and the 'Home Wood,' sufficiently explains the name. In 1562 Kingston still depended upon this neighbourhood for firewood. (fn. 20) Manning and Bray^[47] state, however, that Dorking was supplied lately with coal from Kingston; showing a curious reversal of former relations.

The Holmwood Common is a large high-lying common thickly covered with furze bushes and hollies, about 600 acres in extent. Defoe^[48] states that it was as lately as the time of James II the haunt of wild deer. Agricultural writers of a hundred years ago marked it down as good cornland wasted.

The school of the parish of St. Mary Magdalen, Holmwood, was built in 1844, and enlarged in 1870 and 1884. That now in the parish of St. John the Evangelist was built in 1849 and enlarged in 1875 and 1883.

A great number of gentlemen's houses surround the Holmwood Common, and some standing upon it represent the original intrusions of squatters upon the waste of the manor—confirmed by lapse of time. Holmwood Park was the seat of the late Mrs. Gough Nichols, widow of the celebrated antiquary^[49]^[50]. Francis Larpent^[51], Judge Advocate-General to Wellington's army in Spain and the South of France, formerly lived here. Oakdale is the seat of Lady Laura Hampton; Oakdene of Mr. Augustus Perkins; Redlands of Colonel Helsham Jones^[52]; Anstie Grange of Mr. Cuthbert E. Heath^[53]; Moorhurst, an ancient farm on the border of the old parishes of Dorking and Capel, of the Hon. W. Gibson, who has opened a small Roman Catholic chapel there. It is the property of Mr. Cuthbert E. Heath, of Anstie Grange.

The present condition of the Holmwood is in curious contrast with what was its state not more than 100 years ago, when the road to Horsham running over the desolate common was a frequent scene of highway robbery, and was openly used by smugglers. William Dudley, of Coldharbour, who died in 1902, aged nearly 101, told the writer that a man with whom he worked had been a witness when the turnpike keeper boldly refused to open his gate at night to a body of smugglers with kegs of brandy on their horses.

MANORS

In the Domesday Survey DORKING was in the hands of the king. Milton and Westcote were even then separate manors. It had been held by Edith^[54], widow of the Confessor^[55], and like the other holdings of the late queen in Surrey, was granted to William de Warenne I^[56], when he was created Earl of Surrey. (fn. 21) His original Surrey endowment consisted of the manors which had been Edith's, —Dorking, Reigate, Shiere, Fetcham. But one Edric had held Dorking, or part of it, at some previous time, and had given two hides out of it to his daughters. In 1086 Richard of Tonbridge^[57] held one of these hides —no doubt Hamsted Manor, which belonged subsequently to the Clares. The other hide was probably Bradley Manor, the lands of which lie in Holmwood tithing and Mickleham.

Richard I^[58] appears to have confirmed the grant of Edith's lands to the Earls of Surrey, (fn. 22) and in 1237 William de Warenne is recorded as holding Dorking. (fn. 23) John de Warenne claimed it in 1278 as held by his ancestors from before legal memory. (fn. 24) In 1347 John de Warenne^[59] died seised of the manor. (fn. 25) He was succeeded by his nephew Richard^[60], Earl of Arundel, who died in 1376, (fn. 26) leaving another Richard^[61] as his son and heir. About this time the Arundel lands began to pass through a period of vicissitude. Richard^[62], Earl of Arundel, was attainted in 1397 and beheaded, after a long series of open altercations with the king, (fn. 27) and Dorking was granted to Thomas Mowbray^[63], Earl of Nottingham, (fn. 28) afterwards Duke of Norfolk, his son-in-law. He was banished in 1398 and died in exile in 1400. On the accession of Henry IV^[64], Thomas^[65], son of the unfortunate Richard, was restored. He died on 13 October 1415, leaving three sisters as co-heirs: (fn. 29) first Elizabeth^[66], the second wife of Thomas Mowbray, first Duke of Norfolk, whose share in the property descended in moieties to her son John^[67], second Duke of Norfolk, and to Joan^[68], her daughter by a second husband, Sir Robert Gonshill^[69]. This Joan became the ancestress of the Earls of Derby by her marriage with Sir Thomas Stanley^[70]. (fn. 30)

Warenne, Earl of Surrey. Checkered or and azure.

Fitz Alan, Earl of Arundel. Gules a lion or.

Mowbray, Duke of Norfolk. England with a label argent.

Stanley, Earl of Derby. Argent a bend azure with three harts' heads cabossed or thereon.

The second co-heir of Thomas, Earl of Arundel, was Joan Beauchamp^[71], Lady Abergavenny; her share descended to her granddaughter Elizabeth^[72], afterwards the wife of George Nevill^[73], who thus gained the lands and title of Abergavenny. Margaret^[74], wife of Sir Roland Lenthale^[75], was the third heir, but her claim to part of the inheritance lapsed at the death of her son Edmund^[76], who died without issue (fn. 31) before July 1447. (fn. 32)

The history of the manor is obscure, even with the aid of the Court Rolls placed at the service of investigators by the courtesy of successive Dukes of Norfolk. For the rolls are far from continuous, and generally lack the name of the lord or lords whose courts are held. It is obvious, however, that on the death of Thomas^[77], Earl of Arundel, in 1415, his widow, Beatrix of Portugal^[78], held the manor as dower. (fn. 33) The courts were held for a Domina (feminine) from 1413 to 1431, when there is a break of five years. In 1435 and 1438 Dominus, in the masculine singular is used, probably Roland Lenthale^[75], for his son Edmund^[76]. In 1444 Domini begins, the Bishop of Bath and Wells and others, (fn. 34) feoffees of Edmund Lenthale. (fn. 35) This trust seems to have expired between 26 March 1450 and 21 July 1450, for Domini is used in the former, Dominus in the latter. The singular is used till 15 February 1451, after which the manor was divided, courts being henceforth held for Domini when the number is distinguished at all. In 1528 the question was raised in the court baron (17 September 1528) 'whether Edmund Lenthale deceased was while alive sole holder of the manor of Dorking or holder with others.' Unfortunately it was not answered in the extant records, but it would seem likely that he was sole holder, and that after his death the manor went to John Mowbray^[79], third Duke of Norfolk. The inquisition taken after the latter's death in 1461 is unfortunately now missing, (fn. 36) and the entry in the calendar is insufficient. In 1468 (fn. 37) John^[80], Duke of Norfolk, and his wife Elizabeth^[81] had a grant of certain privileges, including return of writs, within their manor of Dorking. (fn. 38)

This Duke of Norfolk died in 1475, (fn. 39) leaving an only child Anne^[82], who was for some years betrothed to Richard^[83], Duke of York, who perished in the Tower. She died unmarried in 1480, (fn. 40) and members of the Nevill and Stanley families, as well as descendants of Margaret^[84] and Isabel^[85], daughters of the first duke, appear as her co-heirs. A partition of Dorking was probably then made. (fn. 41)

In a document of 1531 George Nevill^[73], Lord Abergavenny, is mentioned (fn. 42) as being one of the joint holders of the manor of Dorking. Again, later in the 16th century, Henry Nevill was in possession of part of the manor, (fn. 43) and on 1 August 1587 (fn. 44) Edward Nevill^[86], Lord Abergavenny, held his first court, with no indication of being only a joint holder, and in 1623 died seised (fn. 45) of the manor of 'Dorking Capel,' not that he was concerned only with the part of the manor in Capel, for the court chose bedells for Dorking and for Capel, and tenants from both attended. Edward Nevill's son Henry seems to have conveyed his share of the manor to the Howard family. (fn. 46) See Neville Family Genealogy

The family of Stanley, Earls of Derby, in like manner again became involved in the history of Dorking at the death of Anne Mowbray^[82]. In 1622 Thomas, Earl of Derby, died seised of a moiety, (fn. 47) which apparently consisted of two quarter parts. In order to explain his possession of more than one quarter it is necessary to consider the third co-heir of Anne Mowbray, namely, William, Lord Berkeley. This William was the son of Isabel daughter of the first Mowbray, Duke of Norfolk, (fn. 48) and although there seems no actual record of his own connexion with Dorking Manor, his son Maurice was seised of a fourth part in 1504. (fn. 49) It seems as though he must have shortly afterwards conveyed his portion to the Earls of Derby, first because, as stated above, they were afterwards seised of two quarter parts; secondly, because the Berkeleys are not again found in possession; and thirdly, because lands did undoubtedly pass from the one family to the other. (fn. 50)

However, that may have been, it seems that two quarter parts were in the possession of the Earls of Derby. In 1586 Henry, Earl of Derby, conveyed one quarter to Sir Thomas Browne, (fn. 51) and in 1594 Henry's son Ferdinand died seised of the other quarter. (fn. 52) The portion which remained in the Derby family was apparently conveyed to the Howards some time during the 17th century, (fn. 53) since the Browne moiety was the only one which did not belong to them in the time of George II. (fn. 54)

Sir Thomas Browne died in 1597 seised of one portion of the manor, which passed to his son Matthew. (fn. 55) It appears at intervals in the possession of the Browne family, and finally, about 1690, on the death of Sir Adam Browne, without male issue, passed from his family by the marriage of his daughter Margaret with William Fenwick. (fn. 56) At her death, according to Manning and Bray, (fn. 57) this part of the manor passed by sale to Abraham Tucker, and from him, by the marriage of one of his daughters, to his grandson Sir Henry St. John Mildmay, who sold it in 1797 to the Duke of Norfolk. (fn. 58)

The remaining portion of the manor passed at the death of Anne Mowbray into the family of Howard. Margaret daughter of the first Mowbray duke, and sister of that Isabel who married into the Berkeley family, became the wife of Sir Robert Howard, and to her son John her share in the Dorking manor now passed. (fn. 59) John was a keen partisan of Richard III, who in 1483 revived the title of Duke of Norfolk in his favour. (fn. 60) He met his death at the battle of Bosworth Field, and his lands, by an Act of attainder in the first Parliament of Henry VII, lapsed to the Crown. (fn. 61) His son Thomas, also attainted then, was restored in blood in 1488, and to the earldom and his estates in 1489. In 1514 he was created Duke of Norfolk. His son Thomas, third Duke of Norfolk in the Howard line, was attainted under Henry VIII, and only escaped execution by the timely death of the king; his lands, however, were forfeited, and his portion in Dorking Manor was granted by Edward VI to Henry Duke of Suffolk. (fn. 62) Under Queen Mary the duke was restored to his possessions. From that time this portion seems to have remained in the family of Howard; the other portions were gradually joined to it until, in 1797, the whole manor was in the possession of the Duke of Norfolk, with whose descendants it has since remained.

Howard, Duke of Norfolk. Gules a bend between six crosslets fitchy argent.

The earls had a manor-house in Dorking; but though Aubrey mentions traces of a castle, there are neither records nor visible remains. The Town Fields were on the south side of the town, towards the direction of the modern workhouse. The common meadow and pasture was on the north by the Pip Brook; but it is worthy of notice that as early as the 14th and 15th centuries the manorial rolls tell us that the villeins of the manor held land in severalty, this custom being specially noticeable in Waldeborough, where there seem to have been no common fields. The rights of the lord over a villein tenantry, chivage, marriage, and so on, were then in full force. In 1442–3 the homage are bidden to produce a fugitive female villein. It is needless to say that there is no evidence of the outrageous droit de seigneur mentioned by Aubrey. In the court held 30 December, 5 Henry VI (1426), Johanna Brekspere paid 6s. 8d. for licence to marry whom she would. But as early as the accounts rendered for 1329–30, customary services, carrying, reaping, &c., and xxii plena opera appear commuted for money payments. The custom of the manor was Borough English, and daughters were co-heiresses. A court baron was held every three weeks, and a court leet and a view of frankpledge twice a year.

In 1278 John de Warenne^[1] claimed and was allowed free warren in all his demesne lands in Dorking. (fn. 63) The lord had, however, an inclosed warren, which was often mentioned in the Court Rolls owing to the inhabitants stealing rabbits from it. Under Henry V^[87] and Henry VI^[88] the warren was let out at farm. Possibly the lord had an inclosed park, for in the courts of 8 February and 16 August 1283 persons are accused of breaking the earl's park; but in the first instance the fine pro fractura parci is only 6d., in the second 20s., so parcus may only be the pound, or some small inclosure. No record of imparking or disimparking seems to exist. If there was a park it must have been near Charte Park of later times, where Park Copse, Park Farm, and Park Pale Farm, all to the east of Charte Park, may show that this is only part of a formerly more extensive inclosure.

Footnotes

Plac. de Quo War. (Rec. Com.), 145.
a Dead in 1909.
Dorking Manorial Rolls, 14th, 15th, and 16th centuries passim. The first five boroughs were confirmed and defined by a County Council order, 26 July 1894, under the provisions of the Loc. Govt. Act, 56 & 57 Vict. cap. 73.
e.g. View of frankpledge, 7 Oct. 16 Hen. VI, in Dorking Manorial Rolls.
Act 28 Geo. II, cap. 45.
In 1622 Sir Robert More wrote to his father, Sir George, that he could not drive from beyond Horsham to Loseley as he had intended, because it had rained, but that he hoped to find a way round by East Grinstead, Godstone, and Reigate (Loseley MSS. vol. i, p. 149). It would seem that the clay roads had become worse by 1750.
Ogilvy, Bk. of Roads; Burton, Iter Surriense, &c.
Hist. of Surr. iii, App. xlvi.
V.C.H. Surr. i, 272.
It was held of the manor of St. John of Jerusalem, Clerkenwell.
V.C.H. Surr. i, 429.
V.C.H. Surr. ii, 40.
They are not recorded in Bishop Willis' Visitation, 1724–5.
Information from the late Rev. J. S. Bright, Congregational minister, Dorking.
a Papers formerly in possession of Mr. March of Dorking.
Dorking Court Rolls, passim.
a A Roman station has been gratuitously supposed to be here; Gent. Mag. Apr. 1844.
Court Rolls, Milton Manor.
In 1515–16 John Sondes of Charte alienated Sondes Place to John Caryll; and in 1594 Michael Sondes was heir to the copyhold of Sir Thomas Sondes of Charte; Dorking Ct. R.
V.C.H. Surr. ii, 264.
Ibid. i, 298.
Cart. Antiq. x, 29.
Feet of F. Div. Co. 21 Hen. III, no. 236.
Plac. de Quo War. (Rec. Com.), 175.
Chan. Inq.p.m. 21 Edw. III (1st nos.) no. 23.
G.E.C. Complete Peerage.
Dict. Nat. Biog. xix, 98.
Pat. 21 Ric. II, pt. i, m. 5.
Chan. Inq. p.m. 4 Hen. V, no. 54.
Dict. Nat. Brog. liv, 75.
Chan. Inq. p.m. 29 Hen. VI, no. 27.
Aug. Off. Anct. Chart. i, 24.
She died in 1439 seised of Dorking; Chan. Inq. p.m. 18 June 1440 (copy). Perhaps even then there was a division.
18 July 1447, a tripartite indenture was made between Lenthale's trustees, the Duke of Norfolk and Lord Abergavenny, giving the profits of the manor to the trustees till such time as Lenthale's debts were paid by them, and providing for masses for his soul. The inquisition p.m. was apparently postponed till, as we should say, the estate was wound up; D. in Aug. Off. Anct. Chart. i, 234.
Ct. R. 14 Dec. 23 Hen. VI.
Cal. of Chan. Inq. p.m. (Rec. Com.), iv, 316.
Chart. R. 8–10 Edw. IV, m. 14.
The Roll of 14 Sept. 1468 ends up with some accounts and 'To my lorde of Norfolk ys Audytores.' The plural still used in the Court Rolls may refer to him and his wife.
Chan. Inq. p.m. 17 Edw. IV, no. 58.
G.E.C. Complete Peerage.
The Nevills were descended from Joan sister of the Earl of Arundel, who died 1416, the Stanleys from Elizabeth daughter of his sister Elizabeth. The partition did not apparently extend to an actual apportionment of the holdings. Tenants admitted to the manor do fealty 'to the lords' collectively, one court baron was held for the whole, and one view of frankpledge, and the dues were probably divided.
Chan. Inq. p.m. (Ser. 2), li, 48.
Chan. Proc. (Ser. 2), bdle. 159, no. 11.
This was after Philip, Earl of Arundel (heir to the Duke of Norfolk), was thrown into the Tower, but before he was attainted (1589).
Chan. Inq. p.m. (Ser. 2), cccxcix, 157.
They were in possession in 1652; H. K. S. Causton, Howard Papers, 365.
Chan. Inq. p.m. (Ser. 2), xxxix, 110.
Dict. Nat. Biog. xxxix, 225.
Feet of F. Div. Co. Trin. 19 Hen. VII.
Dict. Nat. Biog. liv, 78.
Feet of F. Surr. Trin. 28 Eliz.
Chan. Inq. p.m. (Ser. 2), ccxlii, 88.
H. K. S. Causton (Howard Papers, 365) states that Charles Howard in 1652 found himself heir to three fourth parts of the manor of Dorking, two of which had been purchased by his grandfather Thomas, Earl of Arundel.
Recov. R. Mich. 14 Geo. II, rot. 211.
Chan. Inq. p.m. (Ser. 2), ccliii, 88.
Feet of F. Surr. Hil. 4 & 5 Will. and Mary.
Hist. Surr, i, 558.
Ibid.
Dict Nat. Biog. xxviii, 42.
Ibid.
Parl. R. (Rec. Com.), vi, 410.
Pat. 6 Edw. VI, pt. ii.
Assize R. apud Guildford, 7 Edw. I, rot. 28.
Survey of manor of Reigate taken 1 Apr. 1623, 21 Jas. I.
Manning and Bray, Hist. of Surr. i, 563.
Feet of F. Div. Co. file 74, no. 64.
Chan. Inq. p.m. (Ser. 2), ii, 48.
Feet of F. Surr. Trin. 1654.# Manning and Bray, Hist. of Surr. i, 564.

70. Inform from Lord Ashcombe. 71. V.C.H. Surr. i, 298. 72. Testa de Nevill (Rec. Com.), 219. John de Gatesden also had lands in Hamsted (Feet of F. Surr. 33 Hen. III, 379). 73. Assize R. 47 Hen. III, Surr. m. 6/1. 74. Chan. Inq. p.m. 8 Edw. II, 68, m. 63. 75. Ibid. 23 Edw. III (2nd pt. 1st nos.), no. 169. 76. Manning and Bray, Hist. Surr. i, 566. 77. V.C.H. Surr. i, 322a. 78. Ibid. 79. Chan. Inq. p.m. 1 Edw. I, no. 15. 80. Feet of F. Surr. Trin. 32 Hen. III, no. 49. 81. Mon. Angl. iii, 424. 82. Feet of F. Surr. Hil. 53 Hen. III, no. 25. 83. L. and P. Hen. VIII, xv, g. 733 (48). 84. Feet of F. Surr. Trin. 6 Edw. VI. 85. Star. Chamb. Proc. Phil. and Mary, bdle. 6, no. 45. 86. Pat. 41 Eliz. pt. x, m. 25. 87. Ibid. 88. Pat. 42 Eliz. pt. xvi, m. 1. 89. V.C.H. Surr. i, 319b. 90. Testa de Nevill (Rec. Com.), 221. 91. Chart. R. 19 Edw. I, m. 84. 92. Chan. Inq. p.m. 6 Edw. II, no. 43. 93. Ibid. 35 Edw. III, pt. i, no. 98. 94. Ibid. 44 Edw. III (1st nos.), no. 33. 95. Close, 47 Edw. III, m. 16. 96. Feet of F. Surr. 15 Hen. VI, no. 8. 97. Chan. Inq. p.m. (Ser. 2), ccliii, 88. 98. V.C.H. Surr. i, 326b. 99. Testa de Nevill (Rec. Com.), 225. 100. Ibid. 229. 101. Chan. Inq. p.m. 53 Hen. III, no. 19. 102. De Banco R. 161, m. 145. 103. Chan. Inq. p.m. 10 Edw. II, no. 61. 104. In William Pagenel's inquisition, the Hastings family are mentioned as being overlords, so that the manor probably reverted to them on the failure of heirs in the Pagenel family. 105. Chan. Inq. p.m. 22 Edw. III (1st nos.), no. 47. 106. Pat. 12 Geo. I, pt. ii. 107. Close, 32 Eliz. pt. vi. 108. Will. 109. Dorking Reg. 110. Ibid. 111. Com. Pleas D. Enr. 30 Chas. II), m. 5. The present Sondes Place is another house. 112. Corroborated by old pen drawings in the writer's possession. 113. Cf. the tower buttresses at Clymping, Sussex, similarly pierced with early lancets, in work of c. 1170. 114. Illustrated by the late J. L. André, F.S.A. in Surr. Arch. Coll. xiv, 1. For Witley see V.C.H. Surr. ii, 456. The east window of Mickleham Church, prior to 1872, exhibited a similar design, and the west window of the tower at Cranleigh belongs to the same group. 115. See ante under Deepdene. 116. Cott. MS. Vesp. F, xv, fol. 18b. 117. Pat. 8 Edw. III, pt. ii, m. 34; and Winton Epis. Reg. Orleton, i, fol. 57 d. 118. L. and P. Hen. VIII, xvi, g. 947 (12); xvii, g. 443 (5). 119. Chan. Inq. p.m. (Ser. 2), cccclxxxii, 67. 120. Feet of F. Surr. East. 1657. 121. G.E.C. Complete Peerage, v, 368. 122. Pat. 12 Chas. II, pt. xviii, m. 16. 123. Abstract of title to Capel Rectory till 1766; Manning and Bray, Hist. Surr. iii, 593; private information.

Sources

Collaboration

Login to edit this profile and add images.
Private Messages: Send a private message to the Profile Manager. (Best when privacy is an issue.)
Public Comments: Login to post. (Best for messages specifically directed to those editing this profile. Limit 20 per day.)

Comments

Leave a message for others who see this profile.

There are no comments yet.

Dorking parish in Victoria County History

Contents

DORKING

MANORS

Footnotes

Sources