Date:
[unknown]
[unknown]
Location: [unknown]
Surname/tag: Southwick
Location: [unknown]
Surname/tag: Southwick
This page has been accessed 185 times.
Are you researching a Southwick or someone who married a Southwick? This page lists books available online that have information on a Southwick family member or relative.
Surnames
- Bulkley: The Chad Browne Memorial (1888)
- Capron: Genealogy of the Descendants of Banfield Capron (1859)
- Churchill: The Churchill Family in America (1904)
- Dommerich: Our colonial and continental ancestors : the ancestry of Mr. and Mrs. Louis William Dommerich, by Louis Effingham de Forest
- Henry: Henry Genealogy (1915)
- Lapham: Aldridge, Bertha Bortle Beal. Laphams in America (1953)
- Neal: Neal Family (1938)
- Parsons: Parsons Family, Descendants of Cornet Joseph Parsons (1912)
- Sherrill: The Sherrill Genealogy:The Descendants of Samuel Sherrill (1932)
- Stackpole: A History and Genealogy of the Stackpole Family (c1899)
- Stickney: The Stickney Family (1869)
Locations
- Essex, Massachusetts The Essex antiquarian, v.5, 1901
- Mendon, Massachusetts: Annals of the town of Mendon (Massachusetts) (1880)
- New England : A Genealogical Dictionary of the First Settlers of New England (1862)
- Salem, Massachusetts: The Salem Press Historical and Genealogical Record (1890)
- Worcester, Massachusetts :History of Worcester and Its People (1919)
This is an "orphaned" profile — there's no Profile Manager to watch over it. Please adopt this profile.
Collaboration
- Login to edit this profile and add images.
- Public Comments: Login to post. (Best for messages specifically directed to those editing this profile. Limit 20 per day.)
Comments: 1
Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Valerie Tognacci
If you have Southwicks in Central Massachusetts @1850, try searching SOUTHICK. Also, I was laid up after surgery a few years back and was able to devote way too many hours researching Southwicks. I learned that, unfortunately, the “bible” (Caller et Al) was wrong almost as often as right. At least according to vital records.
posted
by Valerie Tognacci