Y-DNA_Babcock-Badcock_Project.png

Y-DNA Babcock-Badcock Project

Privacy Level: Open (White)

Surnames/tags: Babcock Badcock
Profile manager: Kent Babcock private message [send private message]
This page has been accessed 627 times.


Contents

Introduction and Goals

This Free Space Project is the WikiTree extension to the Babcock-Badcock Project on FamilyTreeDNA. The purpose is to assist in the dissemination of Y-DNA findings of those males who have a Babcock (or variant spelling) patrilineal line and who have Y-DNA tested. This WikiTree Project, similar to the Activity Feed accompanying the FamilyTreeDNA project, will provide a forum for the discussion of those genetic findings. The ultimate goal is to meld those genetic findings with the genealogy to assist in parsing the various Babcock-Badcock lineages and, in trebuchet fashion, crumble the brick walls that are inevitably encountered. Anyone with an interest in these above stated goals is welcome to participate in the discussion.

A solicitation is made to any and all males who have a Babcock patrilineal lineage (i.e., tester to his father to his father to his father . . . all of which are Babcocks) to Big Y 700 test at FamilyTreeDNA to expand the database from which conclusions can be drawn.

Information Pertaining to FamilyTreeDNA

One must establish an account on FamilyTreeDNA to participate in the FamilyTreeDNA Babcock-Badcock Project. Establishing an account can be achieved in a number of ways. Purchasing any or all of the tests offered by FamilyTreeDNA will establish an account — Y-DNA, autosomal DNA (referred to as Family Finder), or mitochondrial DNA. Another option is to upload for free your DNA results from another vendor such as AncestryDNA, My Heritage, or 23andMe. [Please note the following — as of 26 Oct 2023 "Until further notice, FamilyTreeDNA is no longer accepting 23andMe autosomal transfers."] Once you have an account, have received a kit number, and can access the dashboard (home page) of FamilyTreeDNA you can join the Babcock-Badcock project or any of the multiple projects (>> 1,000) FamilyTreeDNA offers. Links are provided below.

URLs

Link to the Babcock-Badcock Project on FamilyTreeDNA (after having established an account where one can sign in to FamilyTreeDNA) —

https://www.familytreedna.com/groups/babcock/activity-feed

Link to join the Babcock-Badcock Project on FamilyTreeDNA (after having established an account where one can sign in to FamilyTreeDNA) —

https://www.familytreedna.com/my/group-join?let=B&projecttype=S&

or from the dashboard (home page) of FamilyTreeDNA select Group Projects which prompts a drop down menu. Select Join a Project. On the subsequent webpage, locate the Surname Project category, and select the ' B ' tab which brings up the webpage to which the URL directly above links. Locate the Babcock-Badcock Project from the list and 'join'.

Link to the WikiTree Babcock Name Study

https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Space:Babcock_Name_Study

Updates

This Updates section was revised on 9 Sep 2024. In addition, an updated Discover™ Time Tree slide has been added as a 5th Image.

The current Y-haplotree on the E-FT216584 branch now has 18 descendant Big Y 700 testers and seven clades altogether.

A request for male descendants to Big Y 700 test (or at least Y-DNA at the Y-37 level) whose patrilineal line is Babcock, Badcock, or Randall or [please refer to point 7) below]. We are specifically seeking, but not limiting this request to, the following male candidates —

1) from England (i.e., who remained in England and did not emigrate) with the Badcock, Babcock, Randall surname or who emigrated to Australia or New Zealand

2) who trace their lineage to Robert Badcock (d 1694) or George Badcock (d 1671) who emigrated to Massachusetts

3) who trace their lineage to James Babcock (1641-1698), Job Babcock (1646-1718), or Joseph Babcock (1670- ) from Rhode Island

4) who trace their lineage to James Babcock (1664-1737), John Babcock (1669-1746), Job Babcock (1671-1755), George Babcock (1673-1756), Robert Babcock (1678-1719), Joseph Babcock (1681-1742), Oliver Babcock (1683-1773)

5) any Randall who is predicted to be E-M35

6) any Randall who traces their lineage to Westerly, Rhode Island or the immediate surrounding region

7) FamilyTreeDNA's Babcock-Badcock [surname] Project has this year expanded its scope to encompass other surnames than Babcock [or Randall] — to include the E-M35 Treble/Tribble, Wills, Clifford, Kelly, Coyte/Coit surnames. This past year FamilyTreeDNA has assigned a Family Finder SNP-derived clade assignment of E-FT216584 to 18 individuals thus far — four of the surnames noted have been identified and assigned clade E-FT216584. We would welcome our Y-DNA genetic cousins to join the Babcock-Badcock Project on FamilyTreeDNA as well as Big Y 700 test.

Further Information

Right now this project just has one member, me. I am Kent Babcock.

Please post a comment here on this page, in G2G using the project tag, or send me a private message. Thanks!





Comments: 13

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Images 6 and 7 have been uploaded. One additional comment for image/slide 7. The E haplogroup descendants of the Treble surname trace their Treble patrilineal lineage from Canada to Devon County, England. Early records/documents — circa 1300s — noting the Badcock or Badecok surname are also from Devon County. From a Y-DNA perspective these Treble descendants are a first cousin to the E haplogroup Babcock descendants.
posted by Kent Babcock
The most recent iteration of FamilyTreeDNA's Discover™ Time Tree has recently become available. A new slide was generated showing the Time Tree along with some accompanying explanatory comments pertaining to where things stand on this distal branch of the E haplogroup branch that encompasses clade E-FT216584 and the downstream subclades.
posted by Kent Babcock
This overview slide — select the thumbnail image or 'View All' at the bottom of images — truly does not present much in the way of new information. That acknowledged, I am impressed by the inroads made regarding the genetic genealogy for 'our' collective distal branch of the Y-haplotree since 2021/2022. In 2021 we formed the, at the time, 'new' clade E-FT216584 from its parent clade E-Z5018. Essentially everything presented on this slide has been revealed since then. Kudos to everyone who participated!

New findings prompt new questions. We have a number of branches I would relish seeing more 'leafed out' in the future.

I can only hope that a cousin of our recent tester assigned E-FT216584 might Big Y 700 test to provide FamilyTreeDNA that all important two testers — prompting the formation of a new clade which would better define that lineage genetically. At this point in time, there is some evidence that this tester of the Geer surname is not related to the E-M35 Geer testers in the FamilyTreeDNA Geer Project — but that remains to be seen and further and/or expanded analyses of the Y-DNA will be necessary.

Currently we have the Y-STR results of a Babcock tester whose Big Y 700 results are still pending. I may return to my supposition that perhaps *all* North American Badcocks/Babcocks did pass through the bottleneck formed by the 1640s emigration to New England from England by the ' I ' and ' E ' haplogroup Badcocks. We shall see.

posted by Kent Babcock
edited by Kent Babcock
The Y-DNA Babcock-Badcock Project has been updated today (15 Nov 2023) with the most recent genetic findings. This necessitated a revision of three of the five posted images. Please review the information in 'Updates' as well. There have been new developments on the Randall – Babcock association to unfold over the past months. And the Babcocks are presented with a conundrum of aligning Y-DNA genetic findings with purported genealogical lineages. Does any of this impact your Babcock lineage? Or are you merely intrigued? Come check out the project for the latest additions to the Babcock story. (Okay, perhaps I'm channeling Tony Robinson from Time Team a bit too much. It is going to take us more than three days to sort out the picture for sure).  ;-)
posted by Kent Babcock
This is great! Just to be clear, the previous info was not incorrect. What happened was that will additional Y-DNA testers, a much more refined set of subclades of our Westerly, Babcock and descendants was established and an interesting long ago connection to the Randall family was discovered....like Badcocks broke off of the Randall lineage many centuries ago. Hope you can post your new image of the little guys branching off and what time frame the branching is thought to have occurred.

I am most excited to see confirmation that after arrival in North America, the Babcock line of Rhode Island had at least two subclades that split off from it. This fact promises to be so helpful when trying to break through Babcock roadblocks, especially if more and more Babcock lineage males are able to share with us Y-DNA results. This is alsogoing to be potentially helpful for adoptees who have the Babcock Y-DNA signature, but have a different surname.

posted by R Adams
Image 5 visually displays the split — two sibling clades, one Randall and one Babcock — in FamilyTreeDNA's Discover Time Tree feature.

Like you, I so very much want to meld the genetic Y-DNA findings with the accompanying genealogies. I am so grateful for your contributions to this endeavor and, like you, am hoping we might generate more testing and participation in the future. Hopefully everyone will spread the word and enlist support from those who are candidates to test and/or contribute to piecing the genealogical puzzle together. Fingers crossed.

posted by Kent Babcock
An alteration has occurred in the ancestral path for those Big Y 700 test takers in the ' E ' haplogroup of the Babcock-Badcock Project. (Refer to the 'Updates' section above as well regarding what may potentially be a sea change in the pursuit of this specific Babcock-Badcock lineage). Two of three Randalls of the ' E ' haplogroup in the Randall Project on Family Tree have Y-DNA tested — Y-37 (E-M35), Y-67 (E-M35), and Y-111/Big Y 700 (E-FT216584). The Randall Big Y 700 has not joined any Family Tree projects as far as I can discern. The two Randall test takers comprise all of the Randalls in the Randall Project assigned to E-M35. All 16 of the Y-111 test takers of the ' E ' haplogroup in the Babcock-Badcock Project are distally related to these three Randalls. The genetic distances (GD) are from 7-10 for Y-111 and are constantly near to, and occasionally surpassing, the Family Tree cut offs for what is considered a match at Y-111, Y-67, and Y-37. Those findings imply a quite distant connection that transpired in England. It is doubtful that the Randall – Badcock connection predates the adoption of surnames but that is not known at this time. Both further research and Y-DNA testing will be needed to explore what this connection involves.
posted by Kent Babcock
Here is a link Wikitree gave me listing all of the direct male descendants of John Babcock/Mary Lawton back to Westerley, RI in the mid 1600s. It would be worthwhile to go through them to further our connections. https://www.wikitree.com/index.php?filterId=&filterType=yDNA&title=Special%3ADNATests&s=BABCOCK&order=name
posted by Terry Babcock
I was googling about Babcock DNA and stumbled across this recent post regarding the Amos Babcock, Benjamin Babcock, and Jehu John Babcock lineage that went through the Petersburg/Resselaerwick area of New York. Looks like your Babcock-Badcock Y-DNA project at FTDNA helped this fellow discover a NPE (non-parental event) on that lineage . Fascinating what the science of Y-DNA can reveal when the data set starts growing.

The tester/wikitree profile manager indicates he lost his deep connection to the Westerly line of Babcocks, but gained a Mayflower ancestor! Can't wait to see how this info is someday integrated into the wikitree profiles since that manager is seriously on the ball with his DNA connections being noted on his wikitree chart. I wonder if Benjamin's mom will still be Zerviah Wood Babcock, or if that NPE was more of an adoption scenario....meaning Benjamin could have a different mother than his siblings as well as a different father. Guess time might tell...

Webpage posting showing Benjamin Babcock b. about 1744 was fathered by an Eaton: https://www.rtbfam.us/babcock/

posted by R Adams
This finding (that from a genetic standpoint they are Eatons rather than Babcocks) undoubtedly has ramifications for a number of descendants since the non-paternal event (NPE) has been tracked to a fairly distant time in the past. Even allowing for the fact that numerous lines go extinct over time, I suspect that the fallout of the NPE would encompass quite a few descendants.

Y-DNA represents some 2% of our nuclear DNA profile. So the fact that the NPE occurred in the distant past means the overall autosomal impact has been just that much more generationally diluted as we exponentially increase the number of ancestors each generation.

posted by Kent Babcock
I agree, I bet a lot of present day autosomal cousin matches on this line would be impacted based on this NPE.

About the "Y" descendants, I was trying to visualize them and found there is a wikitree widget to display "Y" descendants who have wikitree profiles in a chart. I found the chart by starting at Benjamin Babcock's profile and going to the pull down menu under "Babcock-7082" , then clicking on "DNA", then clicking a button called "DNA Descendants" (https://www.wikitree.com/treewidget/Babcock-7082/890) Probably you already know about this function, but it was news to me.

I tried the same widget on James Babcock/Badcock b. 1612 and it worked, but took a longtime to generate a massive chart.....go figure! (https://www.wikitree.com/treewidget/Badcock-477/890)

Only tricky thing about it is this widget is creating a second list of "X" descendants right under the "Y" descendants, so I misread it as one big list, but it is actually two big lists. I only noticed it because there were female names popping up in the lower part.

posted by R Adams
Thank you for redirecting my attention to the chart. I had stumbled across the graphic in my exploration of WikiTree. However, after a cursory glance at a somewhat daunting to 'take all in' graphic, I abandoned for the moment my initial foray. I have just now inspected more thoroughly the link you sent to James Badcock's b 1612 descendants, scrolling down while keeping track of which vertical line I needed to be following with one of my personal charts in front of me.

If I am making the correct assessment from the chart (and I have not yet explored this further before replying here so shame on me), then the lineage/descendants from my 5th great grandfather John (1739-1770) to myself are not yet on WikiTree. Leastways they are not noted on the chart below John's name. His name was a dead end for the line in other words.

So I have much to learn regarding this feature to include reading up on such notations as the DNA confirmed status and the like. At first blush, I am not finding the information gleaned from this rather impressive tree intuitive to grasp, but I am sure that is due to me being a novice in using it. Thank you again for directing me to this feature.

posted by Kent Babcock
I am very excited to see this project. I am somehow descended from Thomas Babcock, born 1737 who lived at Stony Point in Orange/Rockland County NY, probably via a Conklin, Youmans, Rose, or Call connection. I've been trying for some time to both find my genetic link back to him (my Great Grandfather was an NPE) and figure out his ancestry back. Was very excited to discover Kent's project on FTDNA and now see this project launching. This is just one big, fascinating jigsaw puzzle which we're only now getting the tools to solve.
posted by Brian Fitzgerald

Categories: Babcock-8628