no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

John Stanley (bef. 1439 - bef. 1485)

John Stanley
Born before in Englandmap
Ancestors ancestors
Husband of — married 1445 [location unknown]
Descendants descendants
Died before at about age 46 in Englandmap
Problems/Questions Profile manager: Magna Carta Project WikiTree private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 11 Jun 2011
This page has been accessed 5,280 times.
Magna Carta Project logo
Magna Carta Surety Baron Descendant (see text).
Join: Magna Carta Project
Discuss: magna_carta

Contents

Biography

John was a younger son of Thomas Stanley, 1st Lord Stanley and Joan Goushill[1][2][3] (daughter and co-heir of Sir Robert Goushill of Hoveringham, Nottinghamshire[4][5][6]). His birth date is not known. It has been given as before 1440 on the basis of his mother's birth being born in about 1401 and his being a younger son. His parents had lands and interests in several counties and his birthplace is also unknown.

John married Elizabeth Weever, daughter and heir of Thomas Weever of Cheshire and Elizabeth. The right to determine her marriage was granted to John's father in 1445/6[7] so they married after that.[1][2] They had the following children:

John's marriage brought him Weever and Over Alderley in Cheshire.[1][2]

John was alive in 1476. He died before 1485.[1][2]

His wife survived him, marrying John Done[8] before 28 June 1487,[1][2] when she was referred to as wife of Sir John Donne in the grant of a lease of a messuage in Cheshire by her and her second husband.[9]

Research Notes

Illegitimate Son John

The 1567 Visitation of Lancashire says that Jane (Stanley) Halsall's father, John Stanley-11004, was "a base sonne of John Stanley brother to the first Erle of Derby" (Thomas Stanley).[10] That would make Jane's father, John Stanley-11004, an illegitimate son of the John Stanley of this profile. This is also the view taken in the 2nd edition of Ormerod's History of Cheshire.[6]

The Victoria County History entry for Melling, Lancashire states that John Stanley-11004, father of Jane Halsall, was heir of the John of this profile.[11] This is doubtful: the John of this profile had three legitimate sons: John, said by Ormerod's History of Cheshire to have died without issue; Thomas, who was his main heir and who had sons of his own, at least one of whom survived him; and George. The suggestion that John Stanley-11004 was his father's heir appears to be based on a supposition that he was not an illegitimate child but was his father's legitimate son John: no good evidence is given for this supposition. A footnote in the Victoria County History entry for Melling recognises that Thomas inherited his father's main property, and this rather contradicts the idea that a son John, legitimate or illegitimate, was the heir.

Not a Knight

John is referred to as a knight on Ormerod's History of Cheshire.[6] There is no evidence he was knighted.[12]

Sources

  1. 1.00 1.01 1.02 1.03 1.04 1.05 1.06 1.07 1.08 1.09 1.10 1.11 1.12 Douglas Richardson. Magna Carta Ancestry: A Study in Colonial and Medieval Families, 4 vols, ed. Kimball G. Everingham, 2nd edition (Salt Lake City: the author, 2011), Vol. III, pp. 126-127, MANWARING 11, Google Books
  2. 2.00 2.01 2.02 2.03 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.07 2.08 2.09 2.10 2.11 2.12 Douglas Richardson. Royal Ancestry: A Study in Colonial and Medieval Families, 5 vols, ed. Kimball G. Everingham (Salt Lake City: the author, 2013), Vol. IV, p. 25, MANWARING 15
  3. Egerton Brydges. Collins's Peerage of England, greatly augmented and continued to the present time, Vol. III, 1812, p. 56, Internet Archive
  4. Douglas Richardson, Magna Carta Ancestry, Vol. IV, pp. 90-91, STANLEY 10, Google Books
  5. Douglas Richardson, Royal Ancestry, Vol. V, pp. 27-28, STANLEY 14
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 6.6 6.7 6.8 6.9 George Ormerod. The History of the County Palatine and City of Chester, 2nd edition (revised by Thomas Helsby), Vol. III, George Routledge and Sons, 1882, p. 577 (pedigree of Stanley of Alderley), Hathi Trust
  7. George Ormerod, The History of the County Palatine and City of Chester, 2nd edition, Vol. III, p. 209, Hathi Trust
  8. John Paul Roland's. The Visitation of Cheshire in the year 1580...., Harleian Society, 1882, p.85, Internet Archive
  9. Cheshire Archives and Local Studies, ref. DVE/1/M IV/31, National Archives Discovery Centre catalogue entry
  10. F R Raines (ed.). The Visitation of the County Palatine of Lancaster made in the year 1567, by William Flower, esq., Chetham Society, 1870, p.94 (Halsall pedigree), Internet Archive
  11. 'Townships: Melling', in A History of the County of Lancaster: Volume 3, ed. William Farrer and J Brownbill (London, 1907), pp. 208-215, British History Online, accessed 28 July 2022
  12. J P Earwaker. East Cheshire, Vol. II, privately printed, 1880. p. 603, Hathi Trust
See also:
  • Dobson, John Blythe. "The Ancestry of Oliver Mainwaring: Stanley (line 1)", web, accessed 11 February 2024

Acknowledgements

Magna Carta Project

This profile was re-reviewed for the Magna Carta Project by Michael Cayley on 12 February 2024.
John Stanley appears in Magna Carta Ancestry in a Richardson-documented trail from the Manwaring Gateway Ancestors, Oliver Manwaring and Mary (Mainwaring) Gill, to Magna Carta Surety Baron Saher de Quincy (vol. III, pages 126-129 MANWARING) that was badged in February 2015 by the Magna Carta Project. The Project later identified this profile in other badged trails between the Manwaring Gateways and surety barons Roger le Bigod, Hugh le Bigod, Henry de Bohun, Gilbert de Clare, Richard de Clare, John de Lacy, Saher de Quincy (2nd trail) and Robert de Vere. A trail to surety William Malet was also badged by the Project in July 2022. The trails were re-reviewed in February 2024. They are set out in the Magna Carta Trails section of the Gateway's profile.
See Base Camp for more information about identified Magna Carta trails and their status. See the project's glossary for project-specific terms, such as a "badged trail".




Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of John's DNA have taken a DNA test.

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 13

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
I plan to do some work soon on this profile for the Magna Carta Project
posted by Michael Cayley
Now DONE. If anyone spots any typos etc, please either correct them or message me. Thanks.
posted by Michael Cayley
It appear John Stanley (-aft.1492) was an illegitimate son of this John?
Thank you. It is very possible. This is what is suggested in the Chetham Society edition of the 1567 Visitation of Lancashire which says that the father of Jane (Stanley) Halsall, daughter of John Stanley d. after 1492, was "John Stanley a base sonne of John Stanley brother to [Thomas] the first Erle of Derby" - p.94, https://archive.org/details/bub_gb_wzvRAAAAMAAJ/page/n121/mode/2up. This is also the view taken in the 2nd edition of Ormerod's History of Cheshire - Vol. III, pedigree of Stanley of Alderley p. 577, https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=coo.31924088434059&view=1up&seq=617&skin=2021&size=125. For now I will add a research note: more research can be done when this profile is overhauled for the Magna Carta Project. If anyone wishes to do further research sooner, please do.
posted by Michael Cayley
edited by Michael Cayley
I have now added the research note - I hope it is clear enough!
posted by Michael Cayley
Yes. There is evidence of illegitimate birth in the family line in 1567 Visitation of Lancashire on page 93. The description of the arms shows clearly that the 4th quartering of Stanley had a bendlet sinister. It is an indicator of an illegitimate birth in the family line. See also https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baton_sinister or https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bend_(heraldry)#Bend_sinister

The armigerous man is Richard Halsall who bore that Halsall arms with 8 quarters.

In English heraldry the husband (Sir Thomas Halsall) of a heraldic heiress (Jane Stanley) (i.e. a lady without any brothers), the sole daughter and heiress of an illegitmate armigerous man (John Stanley), rather than impaling his wife's paternal arms as is usual, must place her paternal arms in an escutcheon of pretence in the centre of his own shield as a claim ("pretence") to be the new head of his wife's family, now extinct in the male line. In the next generation the arms are quartered by the son (Henry Halsall).

John Stanley added the bendlet sinister to his arms of the ancestral Stanley and impaled his wife, Elizabeth Harrington's arms. It was how Jane Stanley inherited her parents' two arms.

posted by Anonymous Howland
Stanley-4362 and Stanley-1000 do not represent the same person because: different people - see Richardson entries for them ... vol II, p 107 ELFORD 11 & vol III, p 126 MANWARING 11
posted by Liz (Noland) Shifflett
His Illegitimate son John discussed here

Vis. Lancs.

The bastard John married Elizabeth Harrington, daughter of Sir John Harrington-4299. This novelist's blog discusses her and her sister

Elizabeth Ashworth.

posted by [Living Horace]
Stanley-1000 and Stanley-1086 appear to represent the same person because: 1000 is an orphan that needs a new home. He was intended to be the same as 1086 but had some unsourced data problems that are now removed. He has a lower numbered LNAB so the PPP should be moved from 1086 to 1000 but all info from 1086 retained. Thanks.
posted by Jillaine Smith
Actually, I think the merge should go ahead. Stanley-1000 appears to be an "orphan," subject to many merges, without any decent sources, now unattached to any other relations. He should be merged away. 1086 is the most likely candidate; it's well sourced and its data should be retained. I'll do a pre merge cleanup and re-propose the merge.
posted by Jillaine Smith
Stanley-1086 and Stanley-1000 are not ready to be merged because: Too little data on Stanley -1000 to make reasonable comparison, needs more information.
posted by Tim Perry
Stanley-1086 and Stanley-1000 appear to represent the same person because: Thomas Stanley and Joan Goushill only had one son named John. Other than the unsourced date of death for Stanley-1000, these two profiles match.
posted by Tyler Bindon