Mary (Stanton) Rogers
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Mary (Stanton) Rogers (1643 - 1713)

Mary Rogers formerly Stanton
Born in Hartford, Hartford County, Connecticutmap
Ancestors ancestors
Wife of — married 19 Nov 1662 in New London, New London, Connecticutmap
Descendants descendants
Died at about age 70 in New London, New London County, Connecticutmap
Profile last modified | Created 13 Sep 2010
This page has been accessed 2,944 times.

Contents

Biography

Never married to Samuel Rowland

Mary Stanton never married into the Rowland family. The connection is between her husband, Samuel Rogers, who is the grandson of Elizabeth Rowland.

Birth

Mary Stanton, daughter of Thomas Stanton and Ann Lord was born 1643 in Hartford, Connecticut.[1] [2] She was their third child.

Marriage

Mary Stanton married 17 Nov 1664 Samuel Rogers.[3][4][5] They had 9 children as profiled.

Death

Mary (Stanton) Rogers died Feb 8 1713 in Montville, New London County, Connecticut, and was buried in the Ancient Cemetery, New London, New London, CT. [1]

Sources

  1. 1.0 1.1 Find A Grave, database and images (accessed 27 June 2019), memorial page for Mary Stanton Rogers (1644–8 Feb 1713), Find A Grave: Memorial #32604315, citing Ancient Cemetery, New London, New London County, Connecticut, USA ; Maintained by Robert Fickies (contributor 46492489) Gravestone picture
  2. Rogers, James Swift. James Rogers of New London, CT. and His Descendants (Boston, 1902) Page 39
  3. "History of New London, Connecticut, from the first survey of the coast in 1612 to 1860" by Frances Manwaring Calkins p 202 [1]
  4. "Connecticut, Vital Records, Prior to 1850," database, FamilySearch  : 21 September 2019), Samuel Rogers in entry for Mary Stanton, ; citing Marriage, , Compiled by Lucius A. and Lucius B. Barbour, housed at State Library, Hartford, Connecticut; FHL microfilm 008143425. [2]
  5. The Great Migration, Immigrants to New England, 1634-1635, Volume VI, R-S, by Robert Charles Anderson. Boston: New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2009.$




Is Mary your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Mary by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Mary:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 6

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Stanton-1166 and Stanton-69 appear to represent the same person because: Same spouse and parents
posted by Alan Pendleton
Hi Betsy and Jenn, after researching this Mary Stanton and reviewing the biography and sources, I think that, maybe after a bad merge, she has been connected to the incorrect husband/s. There is also no sources to support her as the daughter of Thomas Stanton who married Mary Pudsey. From the change tab, her date of birth at creation of the profile was 1640, and the marriage sources are for a marriage to Samuel Rogers. This would make her a duplicate of Mary Stanton. Please feel free to contact me if you would like to discuss. If I don't hear from you I'll detach her from her incorrect family members and propose the merge in a week or so. I'll update the profile so it is more clear. Thanks, Gillian
posted by Gillian Thomas
Stanton-1359 and Stanton-1166 appear to represent the same person because: Same approx birth and death details. Stanton-1359 has no other profiles attached. Thanks for reviewing.
posted by Gillian Thomas
Stanton-3913 and Stanton-1166 appear to represent the same person because: Same approx birth and death details, same husband. Thanks for reviewing.
posted by Gillian Thomas
Stanton-1359 and Stanton-1166 are not ready to be merged because: Too much confusion on which Mary is which
posted by [Living Poole]
Unlikely that Mary Stanton is the mother of Samuel and Henry, as they were born before she was.

Could you take a look at this, please, when you have a moment?

Ros, visiting from db_errors project

posted by Ros Haywood

S  >  Stanton  |  R  >  Rogers  >  Mary (Stanton) Rogers