Hannah passed away on December 18, 1763, in Yarmouth, Barnstable County, Plymouth Colony.[6][7]
A grave has not been found for her. She is likely buried with her husband either in Ancient Cemetery or in the Follin Pond area.
Sources
↑ Massachusetts, Town and Vital Records, 1620-1988. Original data: Town and City Clerks of Massachusetts. Massachusetts Vital and Town Records. Provo, UT: Holbrook Research Institute (Jay and Delene Holbrook). Ancestry.com image here
↑ 2.02.1 Totten, John R., Thacher-Thatcher Genealogy, New York Genealogical and Biographical Society, 1910. Page 119.
Thacher-Thatcher Genealogy
↑ 3.03.13.2 Elizabeth Pearson White, John Howland of the Mayflower, Vol. 1: The First Five Generations: Documented Descendants Through his first child Desire' Howland and her husband Captain John Gorham, Picton Press, Camden, Maine, 1990. Page 232.
↑ Mayflower Births & Deaths, Vols. 1 & 2. Roser, Susan E. Mayflower Births and Deaths: From the Files of George Ernest Bowman at the Massachusetts Society of Mayflower Descendants. Volumes 1 & 2. Baltimore, MD: Genealogical Publishing Company, Inc., 1992. Ancestry.com images here and here
↑ Dodd, Jordan, Liahona Research, comp. Massachusetts, Marriages, 1633-1850. Family History Library, Salt Lake City, UT, Film # 0945512.
↑ American Genealogical-Biographical Index (AGBI), Godfrey Memorial Library, Middletown, CT, USA, Vol. 171, page 488
Thank you to Inez X for creating Sturgis-153 on 6 Dec 13. Click the Changes tab for the details on contributions by Inez and others.
Sturgis-226 was created by Seth Nichols through the import of Sturgis_2015-01-10.ged on Jan 10, 2015.
Mayflower Descendants - JHMF 1:56,232
Is Hannah your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or
contact
a profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Hannah by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA.
Mitochondrial DNA test-takers in the direct maternal line:
Stugis-1 and Sturgis-3 appear to represent the same person because: LNAB was Sturgis, not Stugis. Otherwise, the two profiles represent the same person according to date of birth and name of husband.
Sturgis-153 and Sturgis-415 appear to represent the same person because: According to sources such as Mayflower Births & Deaths and North America, Family Histories, 1500-2000, Hannah Sturgis's husband John spelled his last name with two t's (Matthews, rather than Mathews). This has caused duplicate records to be created for both him and his wife Hannah. Sturgis-153 and Sturgis-415 should be merged into a single record.