John Townsend
Privacy Level: Open (White)

John Townsend (abt. 1608 - 1668)

John Townsend
Born about in Bracon Ash, Norfolk, Englandmap
Son of and [mother unknown]
Husband of — married 1630 in New England, Americamap
Descendants descendants
Died at about age 60 in Oyster Bay, Nassau, Long Island, New York colonymap
Profile last modified | Created 6 Aug 2010
This page has been accessed 6,533 times.
The Prince's Flag.
John Townsend was a New Netherland settler.
Join: New Netherland Settlers Project
Discuss: new_netherland

Contents

Biography

Notables Project
John Townsend is Notable.


John is thought to be the same John Townesend who was an original patentee of Flushing, New York, named in a grant ordered by Gov. Kieft of New Netherlands on 10 October 1645.[1]

John and his two brothers Henry and Richard were Quaker sympathizers. Frost's book on page 494 cites Thompson in "History of Long Island, Vol. 2, p. 344 where it says they were "temporarily in Boston and Providence." Frost continues, that it is certain "that as early as 1642, John had located in New Amsterdam," since one of their sons, Thomas, was baptized that year.

John Townsend's name is found among those listed in the October 10, 1645 Patent of Flushing, Long Island, where he and his family lived. In 1648 he and other men were called before the Council where they were to give reasons why they should not help to support the minister and why he was against those nominated as sheriff. He would not support these things, so legal actions would be taken against him. As a result John moved to Warwick, Rhode Island. There he served as Commissioner to the General Court in 1652 - 1654. He returned to Long Island - Jamaica in 1656 where, along with his brothers Henry and Richard, he was the first to buy land but by 1658 he was again a resident of Flushing. There officials scrutinized him about the probability he was a Quaker and he was instructed to give bail. He was in Jamaica on January 20, 1661 then on February 15, 1661 he was cast out. Frost on page 495 says, "March 3, 1661, he asks relief from the soldiers quartered on him because he would not inform against the Quakers." He did not receive the requested relief. By the 5th day of 10th month, 1661, John Townsend purchased Jonas Halstead's land at Oyster Bay; but he was living there before 1661, and he continued to live there until he died. Frost indicates he "was the first person to be buried in the graveyard on Fort Hill, which was on his own property.

John Townsend settled in Oyster Bay, Long Island, NY sometime between the middle of January and the 16th of September, 1661. He bought his house on South Street in February, 1661.[2] Later returned to Warwick, Rhode Island.

Occupation

His occupation was Tanner. Tanner Collect (where City Hall in New York City now stands) [3]

Immigration

1643 Lynn, Massachusetts
Family Members: Brothers Henry and Richard
Primary Immigrant: Townsend, John
  • John Townsend from Norwich, Norfolk, England migrated to New England with his two brothers Henry and Richard Townsend.[4]

Residence

1609 Raynham Hall, Norwick, Norfolk, England
1610 Norfolk, Norwich County, England
1637 Boston, Massachusetts
1668 One Of Three Brothers Who Were The First Settlers

Marriage

John married Elizabeth, referred to as Elizabeth Montgomery in some sources, but a primary source has not been found. What is known about Elizabeth is that she made a deed dated May 10, 1671 naming their children. (see below).

  • No original record or primary informant is known that gives the maiden surname of wife Elizabeth. While most sources state she was "Elizabeth Montgomery," the origin of this claim is currently unknown. An alternative claim dating back at least as far as the late 1800s was that she was Elizabeth Coles, daughter of Robert Coles.[5][6]

Children

  1. John Townsend b. abt. 1640, the parent's eldest child. M. (1st) Susannah, daughter of Richard Harcourt. She d. bef. May 2, 1696 but was the mother of his children. He m. (2nd) Phebe (_____). After his father's death, his home at Oyster Bay was sold and he was one of the first who purchased land at Jericho, Long Island. He was still living in 1715. Children: Solomon, James, Thomas, Nathaniel, and more than likely there were 3 daughters. James m. Audrey daughter of Job Almy of Rhode Island. He held the position of Town Surveyor of Oyster Bay although he was from Jericho from 1711 through 1736 and on until his death. Children: Mary, Deborah, Jacob, Nathaniel. Jacob b. Jericho, Long Island in 1692, m. Phebe, daughter of Benjamin and Martha (Titus) Seaman. He made his will on June 13, 1739 and it was proved September 9, 1751. They had four sons Samuel, Jacob, Benjamin, James and daughter Almy. His will left a negro woman and boy to Phebe and a negro girl to daughter Almy. Phebe died of small-pox April 14, 1774, aged 75 years.
  2. Thomas Townsend abt 1642 in Hempstead, Long Island, New Netherland
  3. James abt 1642 Hempstead, Long Island, New Netherland
  4. Rose abt 1652 Hempstead, Long Island, New Netherland
  5. Anne
  6. Sarah
  7. George abt 1656
  8. Daniel about 1663 in Oyster Bay, Long Island

Death

5 OCT 1668 Oyster Bay, Long Island, New York

Burial

Cemetery: Fort Hill Cemetery, Oyster Bay, Nassau County, New York [7]

Research Notes

Sometime after John's death in 1668, his widow sent a petition to Governor Andros saying "many years past her husband owned eight acres of land lying and being at the Fresh Water (Collect), New York, then called New Amsterdam, where he did build and make large improvements and peaceably enjoyed the same divers years in the time of the great calamity, being daily alarmed by Indians" so her husband left that home and "hew a small fortune out of the thick wood with his own hands, for himself, wife and children." Frost in her book about the Townsend brothers says, "The Townsend Memorial states it was 30 years before she tried to reclaim it and her petition was not granted."

In the deed of May 10, 1671, Elizabeth divided John Townsend's property between her children. In it she mentions her younger children who were not "of age" and says their uncle Henry was to have oversight of them if she dies before they come of age. They were: James, Rose, Anne, Sarah, George, Daniel. Before making the deed she sought the consent of her husband's two brothers, Henry and Richard as well as the advice of her two older sons, John and Thomas. Elizabeth and John's son John was to receive the land at Hog Island at Elizabeth's death.

Sources

  1. O'Callaghan, page 48
  2. The Poindexter Family History Book, pp. 474-8.
  3. WorldTree Database: "Townsend Genealogical Database". Author: Tom Townsend. Publication: 25 March 2004, Ancestry.com
  4. Josephine C. Frost. "Ancestors of Henry Rogers Winthrop and his Wife Alice Woodward Babcock" Brooklyn (1927). p. 495-502.limited, 1 hour view for members
  5. Obituary for James Cock Townsend, M.D., The New York Genealogical & Biographical Record 14 (1883) page 51.
  6. Robert B. Miller, "Hawxhurst Family" The New York Genealogical & Biographical Record 32 (1901) page 174.
  7. Find a Grave, database and images (accessed 25 April 2023), memorial page for John Townsend (1608–5 Oct 1668), Find A Grave: Memorial #25142988, citing Fort Hill Cemetery, Oyster Bay, Nassau County, New York, USA; Maintained by tony mazaitis (contributor 46980954).
  • O'Callaghan, E. B. Laws and Ordinances of New Netherland, 1638–1674 (Albany, N.Y.: Weed, Parsons, and Company, 1868).
  • Townsend--Townshend, 1066-1909: the history, genealogy and alliances of the English and American house of Townsend. by Tagliapietra, Margaret (Townsend) [from old catalog] comp; Townsend, James C. [from old catalog]; Townsend, Martin Ingham, 1810-1903. [from old catalog]; Townshend, Charles Hervey, 1833- [from old catalog]; Smith, Isaac Townsend, 1813-1906. Press of the Broadway Publ., New York, 1909 Pages 68-71
  • Reynolds, Cuyler, editor, Genealogical and Family History of Southern New York and the Hudson River Valley, Vol. 3, New York: Lewis Historical Publishing Company (1914), 1115, Google Books (Digital Library).
  • Mary Edith Shaw, The Descendants of Francis Muncy I with Allied Families.




Is John your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message private message private message private message private message private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of John's DNA have taken a DNA test.

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 22

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Townsend-9517 and Townsend-39 appear to represent the same person because: Both represent the spouse of Elizabeth Elizabeth Montgomery, parents of Elizabeth Townsend, who also are duplicated.
posted by John French Ph.D.
Townsend-8503 and Townsend-39 appear to represent the same person because: I have no doubt that these two profiles represent the same man. When two profiles represent the same person, we need to merge them. Discrepancies in biographical details can be worked out later.

Neither of these profiles seems to be based on reliable sources (content may be traceable to reliable sources, but that is not apparent from the profile text) and neither one makes effective use of footnotes or other inline citations to indicate where specific profile content came from. Attention to identifying sources and attempting to trace the facts to primary records (etc.) is likely to help reconcile the discrepancies here.

posted by Ellen Smith
Townsend-39 and Townsend-8503 are not ready to be merged because: Even though Townsend-39 and Townsend-8503 appear to be similar in some areas, but it leaves some unanswered areas of doubt to be exact. These areas of doubt is why I recommend a postponement until more information is posted.
posted on Townsend-8503 (merged) by Norm Dilts Sr
What are the unanswered areas of doubt?
posted on Townsend-8503 (merged) by Terri (Lewis) Stern
Townsend-39 and Townsend-8503 appear to represent the same person because: dates, places, sources and relationships imply they are the same person
posted on Townsend-8503 (merged) by Terri (Lewis) Stern
I adopted the Townsend-8503 profile and have cleaned it up to be clearer and better sourced. Pleas consider approving the merge and mingling the biographies.
posted by Terri (Lewis) Stern
The merge has not been proposed yet. It is still an unmerged match. Since you have done the research, you are the logical person to propose the merge and include your reasoning in the comment you add when you propose it.
posted by Ellen Smith
Townsend-39 and Townsend-8503 are not ready to be merged because: Discrepencies between the children named at the bottom of the biography for Townsend-8503 and the children linked to Townsend-39. See the comments below the profiles.
posted on Townsend-8503 (merged) by Barry Smith
Townsend-8503 and Townsend-39 appear to represent the same person because: Clear duplicates: Compare biography's
posted by Laura DeSpain
This was just discussed last month. There are discrepencies here, so they are not "clear" duplicates. See the comments below.
posted by Barry Smith
Townsend-8503 and Townsend-39 are not ready to be merged because: The alleged name of the wife is the same, and they both came from Norfolk and settled on Long Island, and both had son John who married Susannah Harcourt, but:

1. The children described or linked on the two profiles are different. (Even though both have sons named John and James, the life dates of those sons are noticeably different, and the son James has different wives on the two profiles.)

2. Although both of them have an origins story involving three brothers, I note that the names of the brothers are different Townsend-39 has brother Robert, whereas Townsend-8503 has brothers Richard and Henry.

posted by Ellen Smith
Concerning the parents and brothers. The changes log here is complicated. Norm Dilts created Robert Townsend on 30 April 2016. The profile had clearly been created to represent the Robert Tounshend whose 1591 baptism was at Bracon Ash, and who was named in his father Henry's 1624 will. Charles Hervey Townsend makes a fairly convincing case in the first several dozen pages of this volume:

https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/005773014

that Thomas Townsend who came to Lynn during PGM was the son of Henry. And there is a nice article from The Essex Genealogist in 1993

https://www.americanancestors.org/DB396/i/12784/152/144182338

in which a certified genealogist reviews the evidence and concludes again that the connection seems probable.

Now to the changes log here: Norm Dilts, the creator of the Robert profile, prevented a merger of two John Townsends on 1 July 2016 with a comment, still on the profile below, "John Townsend is the son of Thomas and Mary (Newgate-1) Townsend-133 . Thomas Townsend-133 is the son of Henry and Margaret (Forthe-1) Townsend-134, and for that reason I cannot in good faith approve this merge." I don't know if his John Townsend was the son of Thomas or the other profile that he didn't want merged into the son of Thomas.

On 21 October 2017, the unmerged match was removed, with no comment that I see in the changes log, then the merge was reproposed and immediately performed by a second person, with the comment "Clear Duplicates." That is unfortunate, since it seems they had not been the previous year.

Then a couple of days later, Henry Townsend, the father of Robert, was removed as a father from John. I don't know how he got attached as a father for John, since Henry had no son John that I can see. His son Thomas who came to Lynn had a son John, and there were other changes and comments related to confusion between that John and "this" John. So all I can guess is that someone had accidentally skipped a generation and attached Henry's grandson John to Henry by mistake, then the profiles were merged, and then Henry was removed. But I don't know if it is possible to tell what really happened now.

Anyway, when Henry was removed as the father of John, he was *also* removed as the father of Robert that same day. I see no reason why this was done, since again, there is a baptismal record, a will, and then also a marriage record of dubious assignation that is at least still commonly associate with Robert son of Henry and was also associated with Robert's profile on Wikitree. It is clear that he was created as the son of Henry. So I went ahead and reattached Robert back as a son of Henry, so he no longer shows as a brother of this John -- Henry had no son John. I guess that means point 2 is resolved. I haven't looked yet at point 1.

I'll note that of the brothers John, Henry, and Richard, the Great Migration Directory lists Henry and gives two sources -- the records of Portsmouth, R.I. and the compiled genealogy by Frost used as the source on the Townsend-8503 that has just been marked as an unmerged match to this one. So Anderson gave some credibility to that source, although I don't know if he gave credibility specifically to the notion that he had brothers named John and Richard.

posted by Barry Smith
Townsend-8503 and Townsend-39 appear to represent the same person because: Compare profiles and biographies. Same locations, same wife.
posted by Laura DeSpain
Check out Townsend-39. Looks to be the same. Both married to Elizabeth Montgomery-86.
posted on Townsend-8503 (merged) by Julie Short
John had brothers Richard and Henry Townsend, both living in Oyster Bay or thereabouts. His widow Elizabeth consulted with them in determining how to deal with his intestate estate. Richard died before she signed a declaration on the matter, and so when Henry witnessed her document, he wrote "I do own my brother RIchard did Consent to the substance of what is above mentioned..." Richard's widow, also named Elizabeth dealt with a similar matter, also in 1671. It seems Richard and Henry should be placed with John as brothers here, but they aren't. Anyone want to tackle that?
posted by Daphne Maddox
I would suggest that Lew Townsend be asked for input on this. He knows far more than I about how the various branches fit together and I do not feel confident at all about how to chase this down. I'll post an inquiry on his profile.
posted by Gordon Simpkinson
After further research, this is not the John Townsend that was the son of Thomas. This John was born about 1610 and Thomas, 1594. Thus, Thomas would have been 16 when John was born. Other dates don't match up, either.
Townsend-39 and Townsend-4546 are not ready to be merged because: John Townsend is the son of Thomas and Mary (Newgate-1) Townsend-133 . Thomas Townsend-133 is the son of Henry and Margaret (Forthe-1) Townsend-134, and for that reason I cannot in good faith approve this merge.
posted by Norm Dilts Sr
Townsend-39 and Townsend-4546 appear to represent the same person because: same wife and dod