Joseph married Mary Smith in Litchfield May 23, 1817. Officiant was Rev. Lyman Beecher.[3] NOTE: the couple named their first son John Smith Tryon, and Joseph's last will and testament was witnessed by an Ira Smith, who was perhaps a brother-in-law. Both point to wife Mary's name being Smith, not Hoyt.
Joseph died in Litchfield on November 5, 1846.[4] He is buried in the Bantam Cemetery in Litchfield.[5]
NOTE that baptismal records in Litchfield list children of Joseph, all baptized together, as Ann Miranda Tryon (later Taylor), Mary Ann Tryon and John Smith Tryon. This was in 1822.
I Joseph Tryon of the town and county of Litchfield State of Connecticut being of sound and disposing mind and memory do make and ordain this my last will and testament in manner and form following
1st I will that all my debts and funeral charges be paid as soon as convenient after my decease
2nd I will to my daughter Miranda Taylor seventy five dollars to be paid to her in one year after my decease
3d I will to my Daughter Mary Hull seventy five Dollars to be paid to her in one year after my decease
3d [sic] I will to my son John seventy five dollars to be paid to him in one year after my decease
4th I will to my son James seventy five dollars to be paid to him in one year after my decease
5th to my dear and well beloved wife Mary I give and bequeath all the residue of my property both real and personal so long as she the said Mary remains my widow and after that to my son Joseph giving to my son Joseph the use and Management of sd property including the support of my wife as long as she remains my widow and after that the right of all sd property after paying sd legacies [smeared word] And I hereby Constitute and appoint my Son Joseph Tryon to be my executor on this my last will and Testament
Hereby Revoking all other wills by me made do make and [unreadable] this my last will and Testament
In witness whereof I hereunto set my hand and seal this 28th Day of June 1845.
↑ Connecticut Town Birth Records, pre-1870 (Barbour Collection): Litchfield Vital Records 1719-1854, p. 245. Original record Litchfield Vol 1 p. 203. (Ancestry.com)
↑ Connecticut, Town Marriage Records, pre-1870 (Barbour Collection): Litchfield Vital Records 1719-1854, p. 245. Original record Litchfield Vol 2 p. 140. (Ancestry.com)
↑ Connecticut, Deaths and Burials Index, 1650-1934: FHL Film Number 3215 (Ancestry.com)
↑ Connecticut, Hale Collection of Cemetery Inscriptions and Newspaper Notices, 1629-1934: Connecticut Headstone Inscriptions Vol 24, p. 123 (Ancestry.com)
↑ Connecticut, Wills and Probate Records, 1609-1999: Probate Packets, Thompson, W-Tuttle, C, 1743-1880, Case Number 5951 (Ancestry.com). NOTE: this is the same reference as his father Joseph's administration; this will follows immediately in the probate packet.
1840 US Federal Census, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:XHBX-PYN), Joseph Tryon, Litchfield, Litchfield, Connecticut, United States; p. 66, NARA microfilm publication M704, (Washington D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, n.d.), roll 25; FHL microfilm 3,020.
Is Joseph your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or
contact
a profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Joseph by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA.
Y-chromosome DNA test-takers in his direct paternal line on WikiTree:
I can find no birth or baptismal record of Joseph's son James, who isnamed in his will, but there is a birth record for a son named Friend Joseph (born 1824). I wondered whether Friend Joseph and James could be the same person but have come to the conclusion that they are not: BOTH are named in the will, with the son referred to as JOSEPH (who I assume to be Friend Joseph) inheriting all his mother's dower portion upon her death, while son James is awarded a specific amount of money, as are the other siblings.
So, where is James documented?
He is likely to be the youngest child, as the eldest is clearly Miranda, then Mary, then John, then Joseph -- the gaps between marriage and Miranda's birth, and between the other siblings does not in any likelihood leave time for James to be conceived and born before Miranda or between any of the other pairs of siblings.
Joseph's wife Mary seems to have had a difficult relationship with the church, leaving and rejoining it on several occasions, so it's possible James was born on one of the occasions when she was not a member of the church and his birth and/or baptism are not recorded there but may be recorded elsewhere.
Census records are inconclusive because of the number of similarly named people in the area. However, the 1840 census shows Joseph with two young men in his household: one aged 10 - 14, and one 15 - 20. Assuming both are sons, the older one would be Friend Joseph, who would have been about 15-16 at the time of the census, so the younger one could possibly be James, which would give him a birth year of between 1826 and 1830.
So, where is James documented?
He is likely to be the youngest child, as the eldest is clearly Miranda, then Mary, then John, then Joseph -- the gaps between marriage and Miranda's birth, and between the other siblings does not in any likelihood leave time for James to be conceived and born before Miranda or between any of the other pairs of siblings.
Joseph's wife Mary seems to have had a difficult relationship with the church, leaving and rejoining it on several occasions, so it's possible James was born on one of the occasions when she was not a member of the church and his birth and/or baptism are not recorded there but may be recorded elsewhere.
Census records are inconclusive because of the number of similarly named people in the area. However, the 1840 census shows Joseph with two young men in his household: one aged 10 - 14, and one 15 - 20. Assuming both are sons, the older one would be Friend Joseph, who would have been about 15-16 at the time of the census, so the younger one could possibly be James, which would give him a birth year of between 1826 and 1830.