Pretitia (Tydings) Boring
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Pretitia (Tydings) Boring (abt. 1674 - abt. 1734)

Pretitia "Pretiotia, Pretiosia, Presoecie" Boring formerly Tydings aka Lane
Born about in Marylandmap
Wife of — married 1693 in Baltimore, Marylandmap
Wife of — married about 1717 in Province of Marylandmap [uncertain]
Descendants descendants
Died about at about age 60 in Baltimore County, Marylandmap
Profile last modified | Created 20 Jul 2011
This page has been accessed 1,671 times.

Contents

Biography

Pretitia Tydings was born in the 1670s. She married first Dutton Lane, and they had many children. After Dutton died, she married John Bor[e]ing. She died around 02 Feb 1734 and is buried in St Paul's Parish, Baltimore County, Maryland.

Research Notes

Pretitia's name has been spelled many ways in various records and sources, but "Protasia" is not one of them, which is the current spelling on her Geni profile. She also didn't have a middle name, such as "Mulled." It was very rare for English people prior to the 19th century to have middle names. There's no known birth or baptism record for her, so the will of her father, Richard Tydings, is the earliest known record, and her name is spelled "Pretitia" there. A document that she signed with her mark, a deed by her sister, Mary Dowell, spelled her name "Pretiotia." Her husband, Dutton, named her "Pretiosia" as his executrix in his will. Another spelling is Presoecie (see below), but nothing like "Protasia".

October 12, 2021 by RodneySlone on Family Search: Evidence that Pretiosia (Tydings) Lane secondly married John Boreing includes:

1. Dutton Lane's will was written in 1716, but not probated until 1726 because there was nothing to administer. On 10 Oct. 1726 was exhibited from Baltimore Co. the will of Dutton Lane by Richard Lane his son one of the legatees who says there is no effects to Administer on. [Maryland Testamentary Proceedings, 27:342]

2. On 8 Aug. 1717 Presoecie (x) Lain witnessed the sale of a tract from John Boreing (no wife signed) to Jonathan Tipton. [Baltimore Co., MD Land Records TR#A:417-419] That no wife signed, she was apparently deceased. That "Presoecie" signed rather than her husband Dutton was because he was probably deceased, and a marriage was intended between John Boreing and Presoecie (Tydings) Lane.

3. On 22 January 1718, John Boreing and wife Pretiotia sold a tract of land to Thomas Ford. [Baltimore Co., MD Land Records TR#RA:524-528]

4. Dutton Lane, Jr., son of Pretiotia married Dinah daughter of John Boreing. John Boreing for love and affection for his "son-in-law" gave him a tract of land on 20 January 1741 [Baltimore Co., MD Land Records TB#A:166]

Sources

Acknowledgements





Is Pretitia your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Pretitia by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Pretitia:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 10

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Pretiota an Dutton Lane witnessed a 1711 deed from her sister Mary Dowell to a third party concerning land inherited from their father "Richard Tideings". Maryland Provincial Court Land Records, 1709-1719 Volume 720, Page 74 Available here
posted by Bob Pickering
Currently Protasia is shown as having been born when her father was only ten and two years before her mother was even born. According to the first footnote she was born in 1674 (Source: #S-2128411708 Page: Birth year: 1674....)
posted by Dave McNally
Tydings-9 and Tydings-12 appear to represent the same person because: Tydings-9 is unsourced & appears to have an incorrect birth year. They should be merged to clear the unsourced profile
posted on Tydings-12 (merged) by Seely (Kenny) Foley
Some of the parents children are supposedly born before them?
posted on Tydings-12 (merged) by [Living McQueen]
Tydings-82 and Tydings-9 do not represent the same person because: tydings 82 is richard t=while tydings 9 is protasia
Tydings-82 and Tydings-9 appear to represent the same person because: Theses profile appear to represent the same person bases on same forenames & surnames and daughter with similar phonetic forenames
posted by Jack Templeton
Tidings-8 and Tydings-14 are not ready to be merged because: Father of Tydings should be edited with credible sourced documents before approving a merge. [email address removed]
posted on Tydings-12 (merged) by Jack Templeton
Tidings-8 and Tydings-14 appear to represent the same person because: These also appear to be the same.
posted on Tydings-12 (merged) by Dave McNally
Tydings-12 and Tidings-8 are not ready to be merged because: Need proper LNAB. More info to make a proper merger, such as dates and relationships
posted on Tydings-12 (merged) by John Floyd
Tydings-14 and Tydings-23 appear to represent the same person because: Both have the same information and are identified as the spouse of Dutton Lane (Lane-1400)
posted on Tydings-12 (merged) by Bryant McAllister

T  >  Tydings  |  B  >  Boring  >  Pretitia (Tydings) Boring