| Hannah (Unknown) Gardner is currently protected by the Puritan Great Migration Project for reasons described in the narrative. Join: Puritan Great Migration Project Discuss: PGM |
Contents |
George Gardner's first wife was probably born close to 1620, based on their marriage by 1644; her maiden surname is uncertain, and she is therefore recorded here as Hannah Unknown. Clarence Almon Torrey thought it probable that she was Hannah Shattuck[1]; Torrey was following sources including George McCracken, who after extensive research in 1954 acknowledged this possibility[2], and by 1964 appears to have become essentially convinced of its accuracy[3]. However, the Shattuck surname has not to date (Jan. 2023) been proven with direct evidence.
Similarly, the date of the couple's marriage is uncertain; Torrey entered only, "by 1644", relying on a birth record for their daughter (and first known child), Hannah. A Hanna Gardener [sic] is noted by McCracken to have joined the church at Salem on 4 March 1649/50[4]; whether this was the wife of George – as McCracken thought – or was Hannah (?Hapscott/Hopcott) Gardner, the wife of George's brother Thomas, as might be inferred from G. Andrews Moriarty's brief 1950 piece on her[5], might seem open to question... except that the 1974 transcribed version of the First Church records shows the entry for "4 : 1" of 1649 as, "Hanna Gardener dead"[6]. The word dead was presumably added at a later date; regardless, it is known that George's first wife Hannah passed away before 1654, the birth year of at least one child of George by his second wife, Elizabeth (Freestone) [Turner] Gardner. Hannah (?Hapscott/Hopcott) Gardner, on the other hand, is believed to have lived until at least 1664. For this and other reasons (see Research Notes below), the church record is almost certainly not for her, but for the Hannah of this profile.
George McCracken, FASG, who in his 1954 TAG article regarded it as "possible" that Hannah's mother was née Hannah Shattuck[7], clearly became increasingly convinced that this was the case: a decade later, again writing in TAG[8], he stated that George Gardner's "first wife was almost certainly Hannah Shattuck".
Torrey's sources include Ancestry and Descendants of James Hensman Coltman and Betsey Tobey[9]. Compiler Edith Bartlett Sumner straightforwardly identifies Hannah Shattuck, daughter of the widow Damaris (Unknown) Shattuck (later the second wife of the senior Thomas Gardner, father of George and the junior Thomas), as George Gardner's (first) wife. She does not, however indicate a specific source.
The claim is currently (17 Jan. 2023) made on the profile of Hannah (Unknown) Gardner, wife of George's brother Thomas, that she is the "Hanna Gardener" who joined First Church on 4 March 1649. The records of the First Church from 1629-1660 are distinct from those from 1660 onwards: the original book, which was in disrepair, was "sequestered by the vote of the church" in 1660 [see https://archive.org/details/recordsoffirstch00firs_0/page/n25/mode/2up], with selected records transcribed into a new book; the original was later lost and has never been recovered. From 1660 onward, a different record book was used. Thus, given the sequestration, the 1649 entry, "Hanna Gardener dead" – even assuming that "dead" was added at a later date – must have been written in its entirety prior to 1660. If the profile for Thomas's wife is correct in stating that she survived past 1664, the entry then must be regarded as pertaining to the wife of George Gardner.
To reiterate, either the "after 1664" death date, or the statement that the 1649 record applies to Thomas's wife, must be incorrect. Thomas's profile shows him remarried to second wife Elizabeth Horne "about 1665"; Torrey dates the marriage to "about 1668"[10]. Either way, the tendency of widowers in this period to remarry a relatively short time after a wife's death – usually less than five years – supports the notion that Thomas's Hannah lived into the 1660s.
Note that a "Hannah Shattocke" was christened at West Monkton, in Somerset, in early May of 1623; see https://www.freereg.org.uk/search_queries/63c5d80dc2333027cfb855af?locale=en. Unfortunately, no parent is shown in the transcribed record. A "Sarah Shattocke" of a previous generation was married to Roger Loe nearby (about 10 mi.), at West Bagborough, in January of 1604; see https://www.freereg.org.uk/search_queries/63c5da2a865574aa025867b8?locale=en; again, no parents are named. Both given names, however, are thought to be present in the Shattuck family at Salem,
Note that the following passage, as currently appearing (16 Jan. 2023) on Hannah's husband's profile, is in error in claiming that it was his first wife who was convicted of being present at Quaker meeting in 1658; from the date, this must necessarily have been George Gardner's second wife, Elizabeth (Freestone) [Turner] Gardner:
Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.
Featured Foodie Connections: Hannah is 17 degrees from Emeril Lagasse, 19 degrees from Nigella Lawson, 20 degrees from Maggie Beer, 42 degrees from Mary Hunnings, 27 degrees from Joop Braakhekke, 23 degrees from Michael Chow, 18 degrees from Ree Drummond, 20 degrees from Paul Hollywood, 18 degrees from Matty Matheson, 19 degrees from Martha Stewart, 28 degrees from Danny Trejo and 21 degrees from Molly Yeh on our single family tree. Login to find your connection.
[Do you know Hannah's family name?] | G > Gardner > Hannah (Unknown) Gardner
Categories: Puritan Great Migration Adjunct
Is the McCracken conclusion, with its underpinnings, sufficient to meet PGM standards?
I'm just not sure what we may possibly find to give us direct evidence. The circumstantial case may be what we have to rely on.