no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Bata (Upham) Doolet (1771 - 1857)

Bata "Beata" Doolet formerly Upham
Born in Claverack, Albany County, New Yorkmap
Ancestors ancestors
[spouse(s) unknown]
[children unknown]
Died at age 86 [location unknown]
Problems/Questions Profile managers: Karen Neuvirth private message [send private message] and Lisa Fisher private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 11 Apr 2016
This page has been accessed 98 times.

Biography

Bata was was baptized in the Reformed Dutch Church of Kinderhook, New York, on 3 March 1771, recorded as the child of John Upham and Wyntje Esselsteyn. Witnesses were Mattheus Goes and Magdalena Van Deusen.[1]

She passed away in 1857.

Sources

  1. Doop Boek (Baptismal Register) of the Reformed Dutch Church at Kinderhook, New York, Baptism record for Bata Upham, published online by Ancestry.com.
  • "United States Census, 1850," database with images, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:MCB5-GY6 : 23 December 2020), Beatta Doolett in household of Abraham Doolett, Pompey, Onondaga, New York, United States; citing family , NARA microfilm publication (Washington, D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, n.d.).




Is Bata your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of Bata's ancestors' DNA have taken a DNA test.

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 3

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Upham-549 and Upham-353 appear to represent the same person because: These profiles have the same life dates. They represent the same person, namely Bata Upham, the daughter of John Upham and wife Wyntje Esselsteyn who was baptized in 1771. Profile Upham-353 was created with the wrong parents (an entirely different family named Burnside), based on an unsourced Ancestry Tree that connects her to those parents. The name Beata looks like a modern reinterpretation of the name Bata.
posted by Ellen Smith
Her last name doesn't match either of her (current) mother's names, Arrianne (Ten Eyck) Burnside (1755-1807). There is no info in mother's bio about a second marriage. It's possible she's attached to the wrong family.
posted by LK LaPlante
She is most definitely attached to the wrong family. I am removing Arrianne (Ten Eyck) Burnside (1755-1807) as her mother because it is so clearly wrong. The Upham-549 profile has the correct baptism record for Bata Upham.
posted by Ellen Smith

U  >  Upham  |  D  >  Doolet  >  Bata (Upham) Doolet

Categories: Kinderhook, New York