no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Jan Janse (Van Kirk) Verkerk (abt. 1626 - aft. 1688)

Jan Janse Verkerk formerly Van Kirk aka ver Kercken, ver Kerk, Verkerck, Verkerk, Verkercken
Born about in Beusichem, Gelderland, Nederlandmap [uncertain]
Ancestors ancestors
Son of [uncertain] and [uncertain]
Brother of
Husband of — married 1 Apr 1651 in Buren, Gelderland, Nederlandmap [uncertain]
Descendants descendants
Died after after about age 62 in New Utrecht, Kings County, Province of New Yorkmap
Profile last modified | Created 1 Nov 2013
This page has been accessed 3,796 times.
The Prince's Flag.
Jan Janse (Van Kirk) Verkerk was a New Netherland settler.
Join: New Netherland Settlers Project
Discuss: new_netherland

Contents

Biography

Jan Jans Verkerk was born in "Beusecom" [sic, probably Beusichem, a town in the province of Gelderland] in the Netherlands around 1626. The record of his daughter's marriage states that he and his wife came from the town of Buurmalsen in Gelderland, on the river Linge near Buren.

Jan Jansen Verkerck married Maijke Gijsberts between 20 January 1651 and 20 April 1651 (perhaps on 20 January 1651) at Sint-Lambertuskerk (St. Lambert's) in Buren, Netherlands.[1]

They had eight children: Roelof; Aerd; Hendrick; Berentje (1658-Aft. 1700); Geertje; Cornelis; Jans; and Barendt.[2] A note accompanying an abstract of his will names his children as Roelof, baptized 1654; Aert, baptized 1655; Geertie, married (1) Hendrick Janse; married (2) Jan Dirckse Van Vliet; Barentje, married Nicholas Vander Grift; Cornelius, baptized 1661; Jan; Barent; and possibly Hendrick.[3]

Jan and Mayke emigrated to New Netherland in 1663, traveling to New Amsterdam on the ship “Rooseboom” ("Rose Tree" in English) with five children. They settled in Nieuw Uijtrecht (New Utrecht) on Long Island and remained there for the rest of their lives.

Jan owned large tracts of land in New Utrecht and was prominent in local affairs. He is named in a few court documents regarding neighbor’s property issues or changes. In 1775 he was owed money from the estate of Denyse Denyse’s estate. He was the local magistrate in 1679 and in 1684. In 1686 the new Governor, Thomas Dongon affirmed the land ownership of some of the farmers in New Utrecht, "Jon VanKirk" being one. He took the Oath of Allegiance to the English in 1687.

Jan Verkerck of New Utrecht made his will on 10 November 1688. It was also signed by his wife Mayke Verkerke. Witnesses were Jan P. Vandeventer and Lambert Janse. The will devised his estate to "his sunns" Barent Verkerck and Jan Verkerck Junior, who apparently were living in their father's house.[3][4]

He died after 10 November 1688 (one version of this profile said 1689) in New Utrecht, New York. Mayke is said to have also died that same year.

Property Records

April 18, 1695: There appeared before Joost Debaene, Clerk of the town of New Utrecht, Roeloff Verkerke of Midwout, Aert Verkerke of Lewis Co., South River (PA) (who signed by mark), Barent Verkerke, living at Salem, Bucks Co., PA, in the South River (who signed by mark), John Vander Vliett of New Lotts of Midwout and Nicholas Vandergrift of Bensalem, Bucks Co., South River (PA) all children of John and Marike Verkerke, and they deed John Verkerke another son of John and Marike, living in New Utrecht "house, land, etc., as it now stands and is in use of said John and Marike Verkerke". All sign as above. Wit: Jacob Hendrickse who signed by mark, Kryne Janse Van Meteran, Joost Debaene, Clk. [5][6][7]

Sources

  1. Regional Archives Rivierenland in Buren (Netherlands), Church records marriages; Nadere toegang op invnr 11 van archieftoegang 0760, Tiel, archive 760, inventory number 11, folio 25: Record image from www.archieven.nl. Also see https://www.familysearch.org/tree/person/memories/LT83-ZPB . The marriage entry does not have a date, so the date is assumed to be after the date of the previous record (or possibly that same day) and before the date of the next record.
  2. The children's names of Jan Janse Verkerken (VanKirk) are from pages 369 and 370 of the Bergen, Register of the Early Settlers of Kings Co., Long Island, NY.
  3. 3.0 3.1 "Kings County, N.Y., Wills." The New York Genealogical and Biographical Record. (Online database: AmericanAncestors.org, New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2011.) Vol. 47 (1916), page 232, citing Liber 10 of Conveyances, page 243. Text: Will of Jan Verkerck of New Utrecht. Also signed by Mayke Verkerke. Dated Nov. 10, 1688. Estate to Barent Verkerck and Jan Verkerck, Junior, "his sunns" living by the appearant inn his house. Executors not named. Witnesses: Jan P. Vandeventer, Lambert Janse.
  4. Kings Co., NY Wills, pg. 111
  5. Translated and Rec'd April 1, 1703 by Henry ffilkin, Reg.
  6. Notes by MG Pitts, 8/31/2013
  7. Long Island Source Records, Genealogy Gleanings from Book 2 of Conveyances, Brooklyn, Kings Co., NY, pg. 68 P. 270.

Acknowledgments

  • Thank you to Wendy Johnson for Kirk-30 creating Van Kirk-30 on 1 Nov 13.
  • This person was created through the import of PittsPenn_2010-09-21.ged on 22 September 2010.
  • WikiTree profile Verkercken-2 created through the import of My-Family-20-Dec-2012.ged on Dec 20, 2012 by Matt King.
  • Verkerk-52 was created by Kevin Chappell through the import of march 7 2014.ged on Mar 7, 2014.




Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of Jan Janse's DNA have taken a DNA test.

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 13

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
966 Link error shows that http://www.ogs.on.ca/membersonly/Families/2007-Aug.pdf is an error 404.

This is because you must be a member to search web site. Can you change this so the error stops showing?

posted by Gary Nevius
Any ideas on how to resolve this? The error is on another website, which we have no control over. If you are a member of the website (which I am not), then you can see the information. Other than removing the link, there is no way to stop the error except to stop clicking on the link. Someone can access the link and used it as a source, so I don't think we should remove it. Thoughts?
posted by Wendy Johnson
Post a G2G comment like this one to ask Aleš to review and exclude this website from the validation
posted by Debi (McGee) Hoag
I did not put this source in so it must have been added by the New Netherland Settlers group. Since I was the original manager of this profile, I simply removed it from the sources records. I am not a member of ogs.on.ca either.
Who are the parents of Jan Janse Verkerk, b 1626?

He is currently set as Son of Jan Jelis Verkerk and Geertgen Aertsd. Geni also shows this same couple, as Jan Jelisz Verkerk (Verkerck), Husband of Geertgen Gijsberts (Aertsd), but without any issue.

Alternately, Geni connects Jan Janse Verkerk as Son of Jan Aertsz Verkerk and Bertie Verkerk (Hermen)

Point 1) There is no evident family connection between those two fathers. They are simply of the same name, from the same town, in the same era.

Point 2) Geni claims a family connection between those two mothers - Bertie is connected as sister of Geertgen Gijsberts (Aertsd). Although there is no explanation about why Bertie would have the apparent patronym "Hermen" instead of "Aertsd", if they are indeed sisters. But it explains how the two sets of parents became conflated in the historical genealogies.

Point 3) Jan Jelis seems to have indeed died early, about 1618, leaving no issue. So the premise of Jan Janse Verkerk b. 1626 being his son seems impossible.

Point 4) After death of Jan Jelis, his wife Geertjen re-married, and had at least one child by the later marriage, as Mother of Marijke Mary Verkerk (Gisberts), who is actually the wife of Jan Janse. So if her lineage is correct, Marikje certainly would not have married her own half-brother by Geertjen.

Point 5) WikiTree shows the wife of Jan Janse as Mayke Gysberts (abt. 1630 - aft. 1688, with no parents. So to help prove this, possibly we can find her birth record, as daughter of Geertjen?

Point 6) Jan Jelis shows another attached son in WikiTree, Roelof Verkerk, who is probably bogus, and without evidence. He can probably be disconnected, and merged into the son Roelof, of Jan Janse, just to clear the clutter.

posted by Steven Mix
edited by Steven Mix
For an image, transcription, translation and commentary on the original marriage record, see:

http://www.familysearch.org/tree/person/memories/LT83-ZPB

posted by Perry Streeter
Good point, Beryl. Thank you. I'm wondering if someone in the past mistook the handwriting of the 8 for a 3.
posted by Wendy Johnson
Please update the date of death, his will was dated 10 Nov 1688
posted by Beryl Meehan
LDS Ancestral File claims a son Gijsbert Jansz Verkerck, Ancestral File # GJ1H-CM

But no other info, so I am not going to create any profile.

posted by Steven Mix
Verkerk-52 and Van Kirk-30 appear to represent the same person because: This newly imported stray is the oldest paternal ancestor in this chain in need of a merge into the NNS PPP. No tree conflicts. Keep the accurate, precise death date 10 Nov 1683. Thanks!
posted by Steven Mix
Ver Kerk-1 and Van Kirk-30 appear to represent the same person because: This newly created duplicate needs to be merged into the NNS PPP. No tree conflicts. Thanks!
posted by Steven Mix
Verkercken-2 and Van Kirk-30 appear to represent the same person because: This is the oldest paternal ancestor in this chain in need of a merge. No tree conflicts. These matches have been reviewed by the New Netherland Settlers Merge Approval System, and the "Green" destination NNS profile is protected as PPP, and the "Merge Pending" profile is now ready and able to be merged into it. I saved the data to the bios. Thanks!
posted by Steven Mix
Verkerk-15 and Van Kirk-30 appear to represent the same person because: they were in an unmerged match & the New Netherland Settlers Approval System (http://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Space:New_Netherland_Settlers_-_Approval_System) now has them marked "Green" (NNS Category) and "Orange" (Merge Pending), indicating that the two are ready to be merged. Thanks!
posted by Liz (Noland) Shifflett