Catryntje
(Catherine)
Rouse
formerly Vanderpool
Born in Newark, Essex County, New Jersey
Ancestors 
Daughter of Anthoni (Vanderpool) Vanderpoel
and Jacomyntie VanSeyl
Wife of
Coenrad (Rausch) Rouse
— married
[date unknown] [location unknown]
Descendants 
Mother of
Christina (Rausch) Vosburgh
Died
at age 69
in Chatham, Columbia, New York, United States
Profile last modified
| Created 7 Nov 2013
This page has been accessed 281 times.
Contents |
Biography
Catryntje Vander poel was baptized 29 October 1749 at Second River, New Jersey. [1] The witnesses at Catherine's baptism were Weynant Vander Poel and Maritie. [2]
Children
- Marytje Rausch (born 1775)
- Rachael Rausch (born 1778)
- Christina (Rausch) Cooley (born 1782) sponsored by Abraham Van Seyl and his wife Maria Bekker (Christina and Coenrad were sponsors for their son David born in October 1756)
- Margarita Rausch (born 1784)
- Johannes Rausch (born 1788)
Sources
- Dutch Reformed Church Records from New York and New Jersey. Holland Society of New York, New York, New York; database and digital images, "U.S., Dutch Reformed church Records in Selected States, 1639-1989," Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2014 (https://www.ancestry.com : accessed 25 April 2020); citing Holland Society of New York; New York, New York; Second River, New Jersey and New Town, Long Island, Book 58 Ancestry Record 6961 #114876
- Ancestry Family Trees. Family Tree files submitted by Ancestry members.
Acknowledgments
Thank you to Sheldon Sickler for creating WikiTree profile Vanderpool-119 through the import of Sickler Family Tree(2).ged on Nov 5, 2013. Click to the Changes page for the details of edits by Sheldon and others.
Is Catherine your ancestor? Please don't go away!
Login to collaborate or comment, or
contact
the profile manager, or
ask our community of genealogists a question.
Login to collaborate or comment, or contact
the profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Catherine by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Catherine:
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Catherine by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Catherine:
-
~1.95%
Donald Vanderpool
:
AncestryDNA, GEDmatch A201288 [compare], Ancestry member bdv98
-
~1.56%
Sheldon Sickler :
AncestryDNA, Ancestry member ssickler
-
~0.78%
Valinda Wells :
MyHeritage DNA
Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.
Featured Foodie Connections: Catherine is 19 degrees from Emeril Lagasse, 18 degrees from Nigella Lawson, 22 degrees from Maggie Beer, 42 degrees from Mary Hunnings, 26 degrees from Joop Braakhekke, 24 degrees from Michael Chow, 19 degrees from Ree Drummond, 20 degrees from Paul Hollywood, 21 degrees from Matty Matheson, 18 degrees from Martha Stewart, 29 degrees from Danny Trejo and 27 degrees from Molly Yeh on our single family tree. Login to find your connection.
V > Vanderpool | R > Rouse > Catryntje (Vanderpool) Rouse
A baptism record does exist with the date 29 0ctober 1749. The findagrave memorial states that her gravestone her age as 69 years 8 months and 14 days, which works out to a birthdate of 25 August 1748. Is there a record of a girl of that name baptized then? On the other hand, it is not impossible (but unlikely, in view of the prevailing customs and the indication that she was born in a fairly settled area where it was not difficult to get a child baptized) that her baptism was delayed more than a year. Additional records (marriage, baptisms of children, etc.) might help sort this situation out.
PS - Earlier the profile had a date of 10 October 1749 in the birth date field. That apparently is there because the previous entry was for a child born on 10 October and baptized on 29 October. The entry for this person has only the 29 October baptism date, with no birth date.
edited by Ellen Smith