A mother's death date (Yardley-43 died 1583) should not be before one of her children's birth dates (Vernon-327 born 14 Oct 1583), unless she died during childbirth or shortly after, because this was not uncommon during the time.
A father's death date (Vernon-327 died 1621) should not be more than nine months before one of his children's birth dates (Vernon-1884 born 1623).
This error can happen, because (Vernon-327|Hugh Vernon) may have died after 1621, or son (Vernon-1884|Edward Vernon) may have been born in 1621.
Marriage to Elizabeth Eccleston: "England Marriages, 1538–1973 ," index, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.1.1/N23S-NQS : accessed 24 Oct 2014), Hugh Vernon and Eliz Eccleston, 07 Mar 1602; citing Frodsham,Cheshire,England, reference ; FHL microfilm 0823625 IT 1
Hugh Vernon's Burial on 27 May 1663, St Oswald, Chester, Cheshire, England["England, Cheshire Parish Registers, 1538-2000," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:F38N-H2Q : 10 February 2018), Hugh Vernon, 27 May 1663, Burial; citing item 1 p 216, St Oswald, Chester, Cheshire, England, Record Office, Chester; FHL microfilm 2,068,352.]
Is Hugh your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or
contact
a profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
This entry needs to be disconnected from James Vernon whose three sons, Thomas Vernon, Randall Vernon, and Robert Vernon came to Chester Co., Pennsylvania about 1682, because there is NO EVIDENCE that he was the father of James Vernon. Unless and until you can show valid evidence that he was the father of James, this is the worst kind of "genealogy," i.e. it is sticking generations together just because the names are the same. There were dozens of James Vernons living in Cheshire during this time period so the "same name as" has no value when it is the one and only "source." Please disconnect this erroneous link or provide legitimate documentation, not someone's fairy tale.