no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Mary (Walter) Fanshawe (1651 - 1693)

Mary Fanshawe formerly Walter aka Sarsfield
Born in The Hague, Netherlandsmap
Ancestors ancestors
Daughter of [father unknown] and
Sister of [half]
Wife of — married [date unknown] [location unknown]
Wife of — married 9 Sep 1675 in St Mary Marylebone, Middlesexmap
Descendants descendants
Died in Barking, Essexmap
Profile last modified | Created 23 Nov 2008
This page has been accessed 2,084 times.

Biography

Mary was the illegitimate daughter of Lucy Walter.[1] Her father is uncertain (see below).

Mary married firstly William Sarsfield esq. of Lucan, Co. Dublin.[1]

She married secondly William Fanshaw on 09 Sep 1675 at St Mary Marylebone, Middlesex.[2]

She died in 1693 and was buried at Barking, Essex.[1]

In the will of her husband William Fanshaw, the will made in 1507 and proved in 1508[3], he requested to be interred in the church of Barking, Essex, by the side of his wife Mary, sister to the late Duke of Monmouth. Three children were noted in his will:

  • Mary Elizabeth Fanshawe (married Nudigate)
  • Ann Dorothy Fanshawe (married Mathew)
  • Thomas Edward Fanshawe

Notes on the Father of Mary Walter

Mary Walter was alleged to be the "natural daughter of Charles II" and Lucy Walter but Charles did not acknowledge her as his daughter.

Alternatively: "In June 1650 Charles left her [Lucy Walter] at The Hague upon embarkation for Scotland. During his absence Lucy had an affair with Theobald, 2nd Viscount Taaffe, with whom she had a daughter, Mary (born 1651).[4][5]

Encyclopaedia Britannica thought her father might have been Henry Bennet, Earl of Arlington.[6]

Sources

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Visitation of England and Wales. Crisp F A (Ed). Notes. Vol 6, 1906, p153 [1].
  2. "England Marriages, 1538–1973 ," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:V52Q-GQ3 : 10 February 2018), Willm. Fanshaw and Mary Sarsfield, 09 Sep 1675; citing Saint Mary-St Marylebone Road,St Marylebone,London,England, reference , index based upon data collected by the Genealogical Society of Utah, Salt Lake City; FHL microfilm 942 B4HA V. 47, 942 B4HA V. 48.
  3. Will of William Fanshaw of Saint Margaret Westminster, Middlesex. 13 Jul 1708. PROB 11/502/292. National Archives.
  4. Wikipedia. Lucy Walter.
  5. Oxford Dictionary of National Biography: Walter, Lucy (1630?–1658).
  6. Encyclopædia Britannica 1911: Lucy Walter

See also




More Genealogy Tools



Sponsored Search




Is Mary your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of Mary's DNA have taken a DNA test.

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.

Comments: 3

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Crofts-68 and Walter-2 appear to represent the same person because: They are both profiles of Mary, an illegitimate daughter of Lucy Walter. Lucy was a mistress of Charles II and was the mother of his illegitimate son, James, Duke of Monmouth. Mary was also an illegitimate daughter of Lucy Walter but her father is uncertain. Some have suggested that the father was also Charles II, but others indicate that this is not possible.

Mary is therefore the half brother of James Duke of Monmouth.

Mary married firstly William Sarsfield esq. and secondly William Fanshawe. As you can see. Crofts-68 was married to Sarsfield and Walter-2 was married to Fanshawe.

My suggestion is that Crofts-68 is merged into Walter-2. Why so? We know that her mother was Lucy Walter but her father is uncertain.

NB The link with the surname Crofts name comes from her half-brother, James Duke of Monmouth. He took on the name of Crofts from the people he was brought up by. However, Mary has no link with Crofts as far as I am aware.

posted by Steve Hunt
Crofts-68 and Walter-2 do not represent the same person because: Different LNAB, born in different countries.
posted by Nan (Lambert) Starjak
Crofts-68 and Walter-2 appear to represent the same person because: Same dates. It is difficult to determine which surname at birth to use. She was the illegitimate daughter of Lucy Walter, hence Walter may be the appropriate surname. Her brother/half brother took on the name Crofts from a family he was living with as he grew up.
posted by Steve Hunt

Rejected matches › Mary C Walter (-1971)

W  >  Walter  |  F  >  Fanshawe  >  Mary (Walter) Fanshawe

Categories: Barking, Essex