James Ware was the younger son of Christopher Ware. He was knighted in 1613, in the administration of James I. He married Mary Bryden. James Ware died May 14, 1632.[1][2]
Children of Sir James Ware and Mary Bryden were:[1][2][3]
Martha Ware d. 1700 married firstly Sir William Piers, and secondly the Right Reverend Anthony Martin, Bishop of Meath[9]
Cecilia Ware d. 1666[10] married Sir Dudley Loftus
His funeral entry[1] notes that Mr Conway and Mr Reinolds (sp) were not present at the funeral, that "Mr Joseph having on either side little James (b. 1621/2 [4]) and Roger Ware (b. 1624 [4]) also present were James and John Ware, Sir Dudley Loftus, and Sir William Pierce.
The funeral entries is a later transcription noted as "I, Leonard Girtin Pierrepont Barnard hereby certify that the foregoing is a faithful copy of the M.S.S. entitled 'Funeral Certificates of Ireland, Additional MS. 4820 in the Manuscript Department of the British Museum, and that it is a complete and accurate copy of the same to the best of my Knowledge and Skill Dated this 8th Day of June Anno Dom 1897".
↑ Hyde, Myrtle Stevens, “A Study of the Downing Family in England, with Connections in Early New England”, v. 74 [Jul-Oct 1999] : 161-174, 299-308., in The American Genealogist. (Demorest, Habersham, Georgia, United States: D.L. Jacobus), (at 74:173).
The Complete Baronetage, 5 volumes (no date (c. 1900); George Edward Cokayne, editor, reprint, Gloucester, U.K.: Alan Sutton Publishing, 1983), volume V, page 352.
Thank you for your offer to co-manage this profile with the England Project, which the EP is pleased to accept. You are welcome to remain as co-manager.
I will send you a separate message with the instructions.
I understood Wanda has a DNA profile can that be added to this profile? It would really help clear up the confusion one way or another. Although I would like to see at lest 2-3 different DNA profiles known to be decendants to be positive the matches are correct. One is not as reliable.
DNA is not the only source but it is the best. There are several circumstances that can make record unreliable.
Many children were 'The wrong side of the blanket' as the saying goes. Also many children were adopted and given family names on paper. Not to mention adultery. I prefer to rely on DNA as a main source for my connections. I do like to see more than a single person source for the DNA matches though.
Thanks Lena, I would be interested to see the DNA triangulation. It would need a mitochondrial (unbroken female) DNA lineage to show a match to a woman living 500 years ago. Autosomal DNA would only be good for 5 or 6 generations if you were lucky with autosomal transmission to the descendants.
Happy to see his father and mother are set up already, but I cant link them due to protection.
Could you link them please? Thank you
Thank you for your offer to co-manage this profile with the England Project, which the EP is pleased to accept. You are welcome to remain as co-manager.
I will send you a separate message with the instructions.
Jo
England Project Managed Profiles Team coordinator
By Wanda Ware DeGidio the parents are Christopher, son of John and "unknown" Whittington. See Christopher Ware
edited by Lena Chesley
Many children were 'The wrong side of the blanket' as the saying goes. Also many children were adopted and given family names on paper. Not to mention adultery. I prefer to rely on DNA as a main source for my connections. I do like to see more than a single person source for the DNA matches though.
Jo , England Project Managed Profiles Coordinator
edited by England Project WikiTree