Categories: Knights Washbourne.
||Roger (Washbourne) d'Wasseburne was a member of aristocracy in the British Isles.|
Join: British Royals and Aristocrats Project
|Date Estimated based on historical events and/or calculated by ages of other family members.||Note: Birth year estimate of "bef. July 1234", is based on Roger being recorded in a court record, dated to July 1255, where he is shown holding property in Stanford.|
His parentage was suggested, based on a Kyre Park Charter, where Ketel Kyre may have originated from land granted by Roger son of Samson of Eastham, to Henry Ketel, by an undated* 13th century charter. (BHO)
The Roger de Washbourne holding the Manor of Stanford in the late 1200s was the documented son of a William whose documented wife was Lucy.
Habington describes it as rising 'from the fertyle bancke of the ryver of Teme towardes those woody hylles which on that syde inviron thys Shyre.'
In 1086 Roger de Lacy held it as 2½ hides, and Hugh held it of him. The overlordship passed with that of Bishampton from the Lacys to the Verdons, Stanford being held of the honour of Weobley ...
Under the Lacys and Verdons the manor was held by the Washbournes of Little Washbourne. Walter de Craueley, who is returned as holding the fee at Stanford of the honour of Weobley from 1316 to 1361, may have been a mesne lord between the Verdons and the Washbournes.
Stanford was assigned in dower to Catherine widow of John son of Roger Washbourne. She married as a second husband Sir John Musard and the court for the manor was held in her name in 1385  She died in 1413–14.
... Roger Washbourne, who in 1257–8 bought a messuage, land and a mill of John de la Hulle. The manor then followed the descent of Little Washbourne in Overbury (q.v.) until the death of John Salwey in 1420. He was then holding Stanford jointly with his wife Iseult daughter of John Washbourne by his first wife Joan, and left a son Humphrey, then nine years of age.
These yDNA results (Haplo group and markers) are identical for John "the Immigrant" Washborn, Sr. b. 1597 of Bengeworth, Robert de Washeborne b, 1476, son of Sir John "The Old Sheriff" de Washeborne of Wichenford and Sir Roger "The 1st Washburn" d'Wasseburne of Wasseburne, b. abt 1219. This yDNA evidence once again* proving the line of the Knights Washbourne through Wasseburne, Wichenford and down through Bengeworth to Plymouth.
The tests do not, by themselves, prove that John of Bengeworth b. 1479, was born to John of Wichenford and Joan Mytton, as the nature of this testing only proves that all of these Washburns' are of the same line. It is "possible" for this 1st John of Bengeworth to have been from a generation or two back, but thanks to the yDNA evidence, we can say, without a doubt, that the John's of Bengeworth and thus, the John's of Plymouth Colony, were descended from the Norman Knights Washbourne in this male line.
Our ancestry in Normandy, from Tancred (whose ownership of alloidial land in Normandy has been set forth herein, proves him one of the Viking conquerors of that Duchy), to Urse d'Abitot, is established. It is clear that Sir Roger de Washbourne, ancestor in the Thirteenth Century of the American Washburns, was descended from Urse d'Abitot. The surname itself, as of the land of Washbourne (recorded as belonging to Urse in the Doomsday Survey of 1086, and which passed, with the rest of Urse's property, to Walter de Beauchamp, the husband of Urse's daughter, Emeline, when King Henry I seized it from Roger d'Abitot, Urse's son and heir), the adoption of the Beauchamp Arms (to be discussed subsequently), the fact that the known Lords of Washbourne, from Roger down, held this Manor feudally from the Beauchamps as Over-Lords: all constitute a chain of fact linking in family relationship the Washbournes with the Beauchamps of Elmley Castle, a few miles away from our family home in what came to be known as Knights' Washbourne.
The Manor mentioned at Little Washbourne, shown for Urse in Domesday, became the seat of this ancient family. This property is recorded for Godard and son Samson c./bef. 1135William son of Samson, during the reign of Henry II (1154-1189). A William d'Wasseburne is shown in 1202, and Sir Roger d'Wasseburne (this profile), is recorded holding Little Wasseburne in 1280, and as below, still showing for the main Knights Washbourne line in that of Sir John of Wichenford, hundreds of years later ...
3 May, 1517 - John's will shows that he still held the properties of his early ancestors, Knights Washbourne, Smyte and Westmancote, Norton in Bredon (Isolde Hanley), and the Wichenford estate (Margaret Poher).
Possibly most important and maybe ironically the most insignificant, as far as size or value, is the Estham property, "Orleton in Estham". At least to Washburn researchers and family members like myself. This property, first shown for this family in 1202, for William d'Wasseburne.
Sir Roger d'Wasseburne, is recorded in the Lay Subsidy Roll of 1280, shown as "of Washbourne and of Little Comberton, as well as of Stanford". His son Sir John d'Wasseburne, is recorded as also holding the fief, "Orleton in Estham" of his probable g-grandfather, William d'Wasseburne.
As mentioned above, hundreds of years later, we still find these properties being held by the Washbourne family. The point being, we can safely say the Knights Washbourne male line, came without doubt, through William lord de Estham of the early 1100's.
Roger and his heirs had to start again. We know about the small fife of Orleton in Estham, near Stanford in Herefordshire and how later it is recorded as a fee of Stanford Manor, the Washbourne Estate. Also the namesake Washbourne Manor in southern Worcestershire, both being brought to honor by this family, becoming known as "Stanford Washbourne" and "Knights Washbourne" respectively ....
Rogers heirs becoming Lords of Estham, of Washbourne, of Stanford with Orleton and Little Comberton, recorded also with properties in Dufford (Defford), held of Geoffrey d'Abitot, Bosbury, Aldington, Bretforton, Smyte, Westmancote and Moreton in Bredon, Bengeworth and others. The main branch becoming the Lords of Wichenford, and eventually being returned to Roger's hereditary title, as Sheriff's of Worcestershire. 
Have you taken a DNA test for genealogy? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.
Roger is 22 degrees from Elinor Glyn, 28 degrees from Frances Weidman and 21 degrees from Victoria of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland on our single family tree. Login to find your connection.