no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

James Wells (1728 - 1776)

James Wells
Born in Wethersfield, Hartford, Connecticutmap
Ancestors ancestors
Husband of — married 1 Feb 1753 in Wethersfield, Connecticutmap
Descendants descendants
Died at age 48 in Wethersfield, Hartford, Connecticutmap
Profile last modified | Created 6 Jun 2018
This page has been accessed 346 times.

Biography

James was born in 1728. He passed away in 1776.

According to his headstone in Wethersfield, he was age 49 at death.

His estate was probated in Hartford in 1776 (packet #5819) -- his inventory of L2501 included land in Wethersfield, Colchester, Glastonbury, Windsor and Harwinton.


Sources


  • "Connecticut Births and Christenings, 1649-1906," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:F74Z-LZ1 : accessed 2 November 2015), James Welles in entry for James Welles, 23 Mar 1766; citing ; FHL microfilm unknown.
  • Mayflower Families through five generations, Volume Eleven, Edward Doty published by the General Society of Mayflower Descendants 1996 , page 78




Is James your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with James by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known yDNA or mtDNA test-takers in his direct paternal or maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with James:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 2

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Wells-24425 and Wells-16174 appear to represent the same person because: duplicate
posted by Mark Burch
Wells-17855 and Wells-16174 appear to represent the same person because: I created Wells-17855 and later found the same person already existed in the system.
posted by Brian Cross

W  >  Wells  >  James Wells