no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

John Wiatt (abt. 1735 - abt. 1795)

John Wiatt aka Wyatt [uncertain]
Born about in Virginiamap [uncertain]
Ancestors ancestors
Son of and [mother unknown]
Brother of [half]
Husband of — married [date unknown] [location unknown]
Descendants descendants
Died about at about age 60 in Gloucester County, Virginia,map [uncertain]
Problems/Questions Profile manager: Fontaine Wiatt private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 25 Mar 2011
This page has been accessed 1,072 times.


Contents

Biography

Birth

Birth:
Date: ABT 1730/1740
Place: probably Virginia

Note

According to the Gloucester County, Va Land Tax Records there was a John Wiatt who died around 1789-1790. Using the process of elimination, I believe that this John was a son of James Wiatt/Wyatt (b 1674).

In the Land Tax Records the John who died 1789/90 is sometimes listed as John Wiatt Sr. Also listed in these records is a John Wiatt Jr. who died in 1795.

I believe that John Sr. was the father or uncle of the John Jr.

The basis of my theory is due to the fact that the Land Tax Records indicate that John Sr’s 360 acres wound up in possession of Thomas and James Wiatt. In 1792 two new property owners appear on the tax rolls: Thomas Wiatt with 281 acres and James Wiatt with 79 acres.

Here is a recap: John Wiatt Sr had 360 acres when he died in 1789-90. The land-tax rolls in 1792 lists a Thomas Wiatt with 281 acres and James Wiatt with 79 acres. 281 + 79 = 360. Is this just a coincidence ? My guess is that it isn’t.

Thomas and James were definitely the sons of John Jr. This is documented in the Gloucester County Surveyor’s book.

I think this info ties John Jr to John Sr and therefore to James (b 1674).

In addition, since John Wiatt (Jr) had a son named James and a son named Thomas then it is likely that John had a father named James and a father-in-law named Thomas or vice-versa. My family used this naming convention up until the early 20th century. Of course it is possible that John had other sons but which had preceded him in death, which could disrupt my theory.

Evidence, references and other information:

Concerning the Gloucester County Surveyors Book A, 1733-1810, on the platt book page (number 65-397 or 65-2397 ?) there was a diagram labeled Platt of John Wiatt's Land and there is writing below the diagram.

Here is a version of a transcription of that page:

"The above Survey and Division of John Wiatt’s land who died Intestate, divided by a decree of Gloucester Court directed by the commissioners Named in sd decree Decr 1795 as pr platt above. The name of Each of the heirs with bounds and quantity of acres are [Indicatd on] the platt. Wm DuVal S.G." The heirs were Mary Wiatt (the widow we think), Elizabeth Wiatt (a daughter), James Wiatt (a son), and to Thomas Wiatt (a son).

Concerning John Wiatt (d. 1795), here is an alternate theory of his ancestry.

The following is from the book "Descendants of Mordecai Cooke of 'Mordecai's Mount', Gloucester Co., Va., 1650, and Thomas Booth of Ware Neck, Gloucester Co., Va., 1685" by Dr. and Mrs. William Carter Stubbs, New Orleans, 1923.

From page 267 ..… John Wiatt Jr., died 1795, Vestry of Petsworth 1775, son of Capt. Thomas Sr., Vestry of Petsworth 1753, son of Conquest Wiatt, died 1707.

This theory is based on family tradition but I have found no documentation to back this. There is no evidence that Conquest I had a sixth son named Thomas. Conquest I supposedly died around 1708/1709. Maybe the theory confused Conquest I with Conquest II and it was Conquest II that had a son named Thomas, the father of John (d. 1795).

Source


https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/156635686 https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/175655946

Acknowledgements






Is John your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message the profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with John by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA. Y-chromosome DNA test-takers in his direct paternal line on WikiTree: It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with John:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 1

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
It would be very helpful if commentators would identify themselves. "I think this info" is a more useful statement if the name of the commentator or research is clear, i.e, Descendant "Nicolette Slusser Toussaint thinks"

W  >  Wiatt  >  John Wiatt