Hannah and Samuel had at least the following children:[2]
Hannah, b. Feb [12] 1660/1; d. 1660 or 1661
Thankful, b. 3 Mar 1663
a Stillborn child, b. 22 March 1665/6
Sarah, b. 28 July 1668
a Son, b. 24 Feb 1670
a Child, d. 27 Feb (could be same as unnamed son above)
Joseph, b. 23 Nov 1672
Samuel, b. Northampton 6 July 1675; m. 1699 Sarah Rust; d. Northampton 30 Dec 1779[3]
Ebenezar, 341 July 1678
Burial 1712 Northampton, Hampshire, Massachusetts
Sources
↑ 1.01.1 Stiles, Henry R. The History and Genealogies of Ancient Windsor, Connecticut Vol. 2 (Hartford, Connecticut: Press of the Case, Lockwood & Brainard Co. Page 14
↑Northampton Massachusetts Vital Records copied by Walter E. Corbin, transcribed by Robert J. Dunkle| Vol 1. New England Historic Genealogical Society (New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2001-2010, Massachusetts Vital Records to 1850 (Online Database: AmericanAncestors.org,) Page 160
↑ Willard S. Allen A genealogy of Samuel Allen of Windsor, Connecticut (1876) Page 6
Under the Editorial Supervision of Bernard L. Butcher, Genealogical and Personal History of the Upper Monongahela Valley, West Virginia (Originally published in 3 volumes, 1912. Reprinted in 2 vols., 1978)
American Ancestry Vol. 8, 1893, Hughes, Munsell, p 209.
Anderson, Robert Charles. The Great Migration Begins, Immigrants to New England 1620-1633. New England Historic Genealogical Society: Boston 1995.
WikiTree profile Woodford-185 created through the import of The BTM Tree.ged on Jun 26, 2011 by Carolyn Trenholm. See the Changes page for the details of edits by Carolyn and others.
Is Hannah your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or
contact
a profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Hannah by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Hannah:
This person doesn't exist. He was definitely not a son of Thomas, who only had daughters. For lack of a better solution. I am proposing a merge into an existing child of Thomas.
Woodford-135 and Woodford-106 appear to represent the same person because: there wasn't a Thankful Woodford, dtr of Thomas. One of the pedigree files listed as source names daughter Hannah, so please merge into Hannah. Thank you
Hi, there isn't a daughter "Thankful" mentioned in Thomas' will. Your pedigree files point to Hannah and Unknown dtr. There was a Hannah but no Unknown dtr. I am proposing a merge with one of the known daughters.
Hi Carole, The will of Thomas only mentions 3 living daughters, there aren't any birth/bpt records, why speculate an unknown daughter. I would suggest merging her into one of the other daughters.
Hannah is currently attached to the wrong Samuel or I should say a Samuel who has morphed a lot. She should be married to Allen-31314 son of Samuel. Would you remove Allen-2431? and add Allen-31314. Thank you.