This person may not belong in the family group. See the text for details.
I find no evidence of a relationship and parentage of Vance children for "E. Yearsley" with John Alma Vance. Smith-32867 11:06, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Subsequent research suggests that this was EMMA Yearsley who married John's brother Joseph Angus Vance, and therefore that she and her Vance children are incorrectly attached to the wrong husband.
Sources
Ancestry.com. 1870 United States Federal Census [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2009. Year: 1870; Census Place: East Weber, Weber, Utah Territory; Roll: M593_1613; Page: 416A.
Ancestry.com and The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. 1880 United States Federal Census [database on-line]. Lehi, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 2010. Year: 1880; Census Place: Ogden, Weber, Utah; Roll: 1339; Page: 411B; Enumeration District: 096.
Ancestry.com. 1900 United States Federal Census [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 2004. Year: 1900; Census Place: Brigham City, Box Elder, Utah; Page: 8; Enumeration District: 0203; FHL microfilm: 1241682.
Ancestry.com. 1910 United States Federal Census [database on-line]. Lehi, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 2006. Year: 1910; Census Place: Rawlins, Box Elder, Utah; Roll: T624_1602; Page: 9B; Enumeration District: 0011; FHL microfilm: 1375615.
Ancestry.com. 1920 United States Federal Census [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2010. Year: 1920; Census Place: Box Elder, Box Elder, Utah; Roll: T625_1861; Page: 9B; Enumeration District: 7.
Ancestry.com. Utah, U.S., Select Marriage Records, 1887-1914 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2010. Marriage Records, 1887–1914. Microfilm publication, 19 rolls. Utah State Archives and Records Service. Salt Lake City, Utah, United States.
Ancestry.com. Utah, U.S., Select Marriage Records, 1887-1914 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2010. (application of license to marry 0 31 May 1890)
Utah State Archives and Records Service; Salt Lake City, UT; Utah State Archives and Records Service; File Number #: 1924000050.
Find a Grave, database and images (https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/14419620/emma-vance : accessed 18 September 2021), memorial page for Emma Yearsley Vance (5 Jun 1868–4 Jan 1924), Find a Grave Memorial ID 14419620, citing Brigham City Cemetery, Brigham City, Box Elder County, Utah, USA ; Maintained by Kim Millett (contributor 46783029)/
Ancestry.com. Utah, U.S., Death and Military Death Certificates, 1904-1961 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2014. Utah State Archives; Salt Lake City, Utah; Series Number: 81448.
Ancestry.com. U.S., Cemetery Index from Selected States, 1847-2010 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2015. Original data: NamesInStone.com.
Ancestry.com. Membership of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, 1830-1848 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2013.Black, Susan Easton, compiler. Membership of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, 1830–1848. 50 vols. Provo, Utah: Brigham Young University Religious Studies Center, 1989. Private Donor. (her birth)
Acknowledgements
WikiTree profile Yearsley-72 created through the import of Teters_BloodTree.ged on Dec 22, 2011 by Thomas J Teters. See the Changes page for the details of edits by Thomas J and others.
Is Emma your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or contact
the profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Emma by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Emma:
Yearsley-72 and Yearsley-21 appear to represent the same person because: 72 had previously been misattached to her brother-in-law. Think it was a product a bad merge somewhere. I see you're also merging the duplicate children of hers.