George Edelen of Washington County, Kentucky died intestate with Robert Edelen and Sarah Edelen serving as the administrators.[1][2]
George Stonestreet Edelen of Maryland and George Edelen of Washington County, Kentucky were TWO ENTIRELY DIFFERENT INDIVIDUALS. George Stonestreet was married on 31 Dec 1790 in Prince George's County, Maryland to Rebecca Boarman. He was enumerated in the 1790 Prince George's County, Maryland census with one free white female (likely one of his spinster sisters) and six slaves. He was a legatee in his father's 1791 will. He and his wife were legatees in the 1808 will of his bachelor brother Electius Edelen. George S. Edelen was a legatee in the 1825 will of his spinster sister Frances Edelen. He never left Maryland and came to Kentucky. PLEASE STOP PERPETUATING this mistake which has been bandied about without looking into it more deeply. I corresponded for decades with two other Edelen experts, Crolian Edelen and Charmaine Walker. We know of what we speak. George Edelen was enumerated in 1790 Washington County, Maryland, and settled in Kentucky shortly thereafter. He was dead long before George Stonestreet Edelen of Maryland. George died about Jul 1810, living on Cartwrights Creek in South Springfield Precinct. His brother-in-law, Joseph Edelen of Nelson County, assisted his widow Sarah settling the estate.
Charles County Gentry being shown in the photo portion of this page, apparently as evidence, was originally published in a printing of 150 copies. First edition #150 is in my personal collection of genealogy resources. I am very familiar with it. There are errors in it, as there are with most published genealogies.
↑ Source: Year: 1800; Census Place: Port Tobacco Parish, Charles, Maryland; Series: M32; Roll: 10; Page: 96; Image: 103;
↑ Source: Dodd, Jordan, Liahona Research, comp. Maryland Marriages, 1655-1850; Original data: Most of the records in this index may be found at the Maryland Historical Society or the Family History Library. More specific source information is listed with each entry. Original marriage licenses should be located at the county clerk's office.
↑ Washington County (Kentucky) Will Book B, p. 123.
Is George your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or contact
the profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with George by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known yDNA or mtDNA test-takers in his direct paternal or maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with George:
As a member of the US Black Heritage Project, I have added categories for the slaves owned by George Edelen on this profile using the standards of the US Black Heritage Exchange Program. This helps us connect enslaved ancestors to their descendants. See the Heritage Exchange Portal for more information.
George Stonestreet Edelen of Maryland and George Edelen of Washington County, Kentucky were TWO ENTIRELY DIFFERENT INDIVIDUALS. George Stonestreet was married on 31 Dec 1790 in Prince George's County, Maryland to Rebecca Boarman. He was enumerated in the 1790 Prince George's County, Maryland census with one free white female (likely one of his spinster sisters) and six slaves. He was a legatee in his father's 1791 will. He and his wife were legatees in the 1808 will of his bachelor brother Electius Edelen. George S. Edelen was a legatee in the 1825 will of his spinster sister Frances Edelen. He never left Maryland and came to Kentucky. PLEASE STOP PERPETUATING this mistake which has been bandied about without looking into it deeper. I corresponded for decades with two other Edelen experts, Crolian Edelen and Charmaine Walker. We know of what we speak. George Edelen was enumerated in the 1790 Washington County, Maryland and settled in Kentucky shortly thereafter. He was dead long before George Stonestreet Edelen of Maryland.
The tone of this comment, leaves me feeling very uncomfortable. You shout about a source being incorrect yet are offering no documentation and the repeated removal of data I have entered is beginning to feel a bit harassing.
I'm not offering a definitive parentage for George so what kind of documentation am I supposed to be presenting? I have my personal inclination to who I think they were but not enough evidence to make a public claim. What I am saying is he is not the same person as George Stonestreet Edelen. All one has to do is look at the records relating to G. S. E. and his immediate family to see that he was alive in Maryland many years after G. E. died in Kentucky in 1810. Genealogies have errors about these two because people don't take the time to look into this matter for themselves and simply pass along errors made by others previously. Please don't take offense. I'm just hoping these obvious errors from the past would stop being presented as fact. Thanks for your many contributions.
edited by Todd Whitesides