Henry Poley, Poley-100 has previously been shown on WikiTree as a son: there appears to be no good evidence for this, and he is not listed as a son in either the works of Douglas Richardson[2][3] or the Visitations of Suffolk.[4]
Sources
↑ 1.01.11.2 Douglas Richardson, Royal Ancestry: A Study in Colonial and Medieval Families, 5 vols., ed. Kimball G. Everingham (Salt Lake City, Utah: the author, 2013), Vol III, p 350-351 HUBBARD #14.
↑ Douglas Richardson. Magna Carta Ancestry: A Study in Colonial and Medieval Families, 4 vols, ed. Kimball G. Everingham, 2nd edition (Salt Lake City: the author, 2011), Vol. II, p. 506, KIRTON 11, Google Books
↑ Douglas Richardson. Royal Ancestry: A Study in Colonial and Medieval Families, 5 vols, ed. Kimball G. Everingham (Salt Lake City: the author, 2013), Vol. III, pp. 350-351, HUBBARD 14
↑ Walter C Metcalfe. The Visitations of Suffolk, William Pollard, 1882, p. 58, Poley of Badley, Internet Archive
Is Henry your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or contact
the profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
After posting a comment on the profiles of formerly-shown son Henry, https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Poley-100, and Constance Geddinge, I have severed the parental relationship and added research notes to the three profiles so that son Henry can easily be added back if evidence emerges later.