Ruth was born in 1913. She was the daughter of Samuel Ream and Laura Hughes. She passed away in 1938.
Research Notes
Ruth and her husband James both died before 1940. No evidence of any children was found.
Sources
"California Birth Index, 1905-1995," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:VGDM-XSX : 27 November 2014), Ruth Ream, 22 Aug 1913; citing Los Angeles, California, United States, Department of Health Services, Vital Statistics Department, Sacramento.
"United States Census, 1920," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:MHWC-S9H : accessed 16 June 2019), Ruth Reams in household of Samuel Reams, San Bernardino, San Bernardino, California, United States; citing ED 200, sheet 13A, line 21, family 301, NARA microfilm publication T625 (Washington D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, 1992), roll 129; FHL microfilm 1,820,129.
"United States Census, 1930," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:XCV9-SWH : accessed 16 June 2019), Ruth E Ream in household of Samuel W Ream, Los Angeles (Districts 0001-0250), Los Angeles, California, United States; citing enumeration district (ED) ED 85, sheet 6B, line 62, family 106, NARA microfilm publication T626 (Washington D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, 2002), roll 135; FHL microfilm 2,339,870.
"California, County Marriages, 1850-1952," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:K8JN-SH4 : 8 December 2017), James Elvin Brazeal and Ruth E Ream, 08 Oct 1934; citing Los Angeles, California, United States, county courthouses, California; FHL microfilm 2,113,656.
"California Death Index, 1905-1939," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:QKSM-5GYH : 8 November 2017), Ruth E Brazeal, 10 Nov 1938; citing 66006, Department of Health Services, Vital Statistics Department, Sacramento; FHL microfilm 1,686,048.
Is Ruth your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or contact
the profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Ruth by comparing test results with other carriers of her ancestors' mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Ruth: