Samuel, born 14 Jun, 1689, married at Kittery, Me. 19 October 1710, by Rev. Jeremiah Wise, to Martha, born 9 February 1684, daughter of Paul and Catherine Wentworth.
↑ "The Wentworth Genealogy comprising The Origin of the name, the Family in England and a particular account of Elder William Wentworth, the Emigrant and of his descendants". By John Wentworth, LL.D., of Chicago, Ill. In Two Volumes, Volume 1. 1870 Press of Alfred Mudge & Son, Boston, Mass pg. 87
Source: S99 Type: Web Site Title: Ancestry.com URL: www.ancestry.com Data Changed: Date: 4 AUG 2012
Genealogical Publishing Co.; Baltimore, MD, USA; Volume Title: New England Marriages Prior to 1700
Ancestry.com. U.S., New England Marriages Prior to 1700 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 2012.
Acknowledgments
WikiTree profile Tozier-21 created through the import of Perry Family Tree.ged on Dec 19, 2011 by Glen Perry.
WikiTree profile Tozier-81 created through the import of Rockwell Family Tree.ged on Oct 9, 2012 by Toby Rockwell.
Is Martha your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or
contact
a profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Martha by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Martha:
Did Martha (Tozier) Lord really die in 1733? She is named in her husband's will which was made in the summer of 1733. Reference: William M. Sargent, A. M., Maine Wills, 1640-1760 (Portland, Maine, USA, Brown Thurston & Co., 1887), Family History Library, Salt Lake City, Utah, page 339, will of Nathan Lord, Sr.
There is no evidence. FamilySearch has no results for her. Summer (Jul/Aug) 1733 seems to be a popular opinion on Ancestry trees, and also 1758 is popular.
I think that it could safely be marked "1733" and tagged "After this date".
I think that it could safely be marked "1733" and tagged "After this date".
You should also add your source.
edited by Murray Maloney