Harriet was born about 1802. She passed away in 1888.
ROLLS’ COURT, Aug. 5.
COLYEAR v. MULGRAVE.
This case came before the Court upon a demurrer to an original bill, and a bill of revival and supplement, filed by Harriet Frances Colyear, one of the natural children of the late Earl Portmore, praying that certain agreements entered into between the late Earl and his only son, Brownlow Charles Colyear, in favour of herself and three sisters, might be carried into execution. It appeared that Lord Milsington was entitled after the death of his father, the then Earl of Portmore, to 5,000 l. and 19,350 l. 4 per Cents. This latter sum he afterwards assigned to a person named Bruce, as a security for moneys due to him. In 1817, Brownlow Charles Colyear, the only son of Lord Milsington, attained his majority, when he entered into agreements to discharge considerable debts of his father, and being desirous of making a provision for the natural children of his father, he agreed to purchase the interest of Lord Milsington in the sum of 19,350 l., and to assign it with some other money, amounting altogether to 20,000 l., to Mr. Surman, an attorney, for their benefit. In this arrangement it was expressly declared that Lord Milsington, and Brownlow Charles Colyear should have the power of avoiding the stipulations in the agreement, provided the provision made for the natural children of Lord Milsington was not interfered with. Before these arrangements were carried into effect Mr. Colyear went abroad, and there died in 1819, leaving a will by which he gave all his property to his father and made him his executor. In 1825 Lord Milsington, then Earl Portmore, succeeded in setting aside the deed assigning the money to Bruce, and in 1834 the present bill was filed, which prayed that the female defendants might be declared to have a lien upon the personal estate of Mr. Colyear for the 20,000 l.
Lord LANGDALE, in giving judgment, observed that it had been contended that the parties were entitled to no relief from a Court of Equity, inasmuch as the agreement to assign the 20,000 l. to Mr. Surman for the benefit of the natural children had never been perfected. It had been further argued that Mr. Brownlow Charles Colyear had put himself in loco parentis. He did not think the facts bore out that statement, and had not been able to come to the same conclusion. The point which had been mainly rested upon was that the parties were entitled to a specific performance of the agreement; but he could not concur in the opinion, as the agreement itself was never completed. It was unfortunate that Mr. Brownlow died before the arrangements were finally settled. His lordship then observed that he did not think a Court of Equity could enforce the agreement, and therefore he felt himself bound to allow the demurrer.
Reports of Cases in Chancery, Argued and Determined in the Rolls Court during the time of Lord Langdale, Master of the Rolls. by Benjamin Keen, Esq. Barrister at Law. Vol. II. New York 1844, accessible on books.google.sk March 2021. pages 82-98 Some significant extracts naming people are given here.
p. 82 1836. – Colyear v. The Countess of Mulgrave
Between MARY ANN COLYEAR, Plaintiff, and THE RT. HON. (81) MARTHA SOPHIA, COUNTESS OF MULGRAVE, WIDOW, THE HON. EDWARD PHIPPS, THE RT. HON. THOMAS CHARLES, EARL OF PORTMORE, THE GOVERNOR AND COMPANY OF THE BANK OF ENGLAND, WILLIAM HENRY SURMAN, ANDRE LIBERT ROMAIN VIOLLET, AND HARRIET FRANCES, HIS WIFE, JOHN AMBROSE CLERK, AND JULIANA CATHERINE, HIS WIFE, AND EDWARD ROGER, AND ELEANOR HIS WIFE; Defendants
p. 84 “The Earl of Portmore answered the bill, but died on the 18th of January, 1835.” “Lord Milsington had seven natural children, the plaintiff in the present suit, and three other daughters, and three sons. Mr. Colyear, his only legitimate child, attained his age of twenty-one years on the 4th of August 1817,”
p. 85 The following list of names occurs in the middle of a very long complex sentence: “...so as to make 20,000 l. of lawful money of Great Britain, into the name of a trustee for the purpose of making provision for Harriet Frances Colyear, the wife of Andre Libert Romain Viollet, Mary Ann Colyear, Juliana Catherine Colyear, the wife of John Ambrose Clerk, and Eleanor Colyear, the wife of Edward Roger, the four natural daughters of the said Thomas Charles Viscount Milsington, and that Lord Milsington and Brownlow Charles Colyear should accordingly give up and relinguish their respective interests therein, and procure such transfer to be made; ...”
Andre Viollet aged 45, Professeur de Langue, F (foreign)
Harriet Viollet aged 35, N (not born in same county)
Charles Viollet aged 15, F
Harriet Viollet aged 12, F
Edward Viollet aged 9, F
William Viollet aged 7, F
Harriet Viollett married, aged 50, Annuitant, born at St. Giles, Middlesex
Thomas H Heath head, un, aged 54, Landed Proprietor, born at Chichester, Sussex
Harriet Violet cousin, M, aged 58, Housekeeper, born London, Middlesex
Thomas Heath head, un, aged 64, Annuitant, born at Chichester, Sussex
Harriet Viollet boarder, mar, aged 69, Annuitant, born London, Middlesex
Thomas Heath head, mar, aged 74, Annuitant, born at Chichester, Sussex
Harriet Violett cousin, W, aged 79, Annuitant, born London, Middlesex
Harriet Frances Viollet died 12 January 1888, probate date 29 February 1888, linked person Charles Viollet, County: Sussex, Registry: London
Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.
Featured Female Poet connections: Harriet is 13 degrees from Anne Bradstreet, 20 degrees from Ruth Niland, 27 degrees from Karin Boye, 24 degrees from 照 松平, 9 degrees from Anne Barnard, 29 degrees from Lola Rodríguez de Tió, 19 degrees from Christina Rossetti, 17 degrees from Emily Dickinson, 32 degrees from Nikki Giovanni, 24 degrees from Isabella Crawford, 19 degrees from Mary Gilmore and 17 degrees from Elizabeth MacDonald on our single family tree. Login to find your connection.