Thanks Cynthia,
Since this thread began, back in August, I've realized the problem was trying to open dead links to a gedcom that had been removed. This gedcom exists in other places online, parts of it are correct but, collaboration of information is required to correct the deficiencies and bring this information up to date.
Compounding this problem are circular links found in areas, possible missing generations, or extra generations in others, making it impossible to be sure which generation is which, and sort out these issues.
I have even adjusted my records to match some of what was shown here, and investigate if my family, had visited the wrong grave sites, of our own family members, obtained the wrong records from the wrong courthouses, had holidays with the wrong cousins and spoken of the wrong grandparents, great-aunts, and great-uncles.
I'm only being half sarcastic, it was the only way to make sense of the information. My family on the whole, and different individuals in the family, have been doing research on our line since at least the 1970's, mostly in person. It is upsetting for someone to inform any of us we don't know what is correct. When records obtained by a family member, available due to 45 years of combined verified effort, is rejected in favor of "sounds like", or "appears to be", we find that difficult. But I still looked into this gedcom to see what it contained.
There are many sources available for the information shown here, some matches the information I have, some doesn't. The online sources contradict the gedcom as it was downloaded. What we have here isn't exactly wrong, but it is jumbled and incomplete.
Other than adding recent profiles, I have not found a lot of missing profiles. There are many duplicates, disconnected profiles, and one downloaded line, full of issues, dominating the landscape. Nothing would make me happier than for someone to succeed in correcting these problems.
Possibly you will have better luck than I have, so I encourage you to attempt that if you are interested.
Thanks again.