This line came up in the G2G discussion on descendants of Edward III. This appears to be another incorrect/unproven line. Les Blevins has put a lot of effort into the research and even cites his own book, but there appears to be no actual evidence as to the origins of this Blethyn/Blevins family.
William Blethyn-5 is said to be the son of a Henry Blethyn-7. Henry was apparently recorded as a crew member on the ship ‘’Submission’’, one of twenty-three immigrant ships in “Penn's Fleet". After some searching around, there appears to be no actual reason to think William was a son of Henry.
This Henry Blethyn-7 is then given as a son of James Blethyn and Anne (Browne) Blethyn. Again this seems completely unsupported. What is the reason to think that Henry was the son of James? Why is he given a birth place of Lancashire, England and then connected to a family in Monmouthshire, Wale?
I am hoping to get the thoughts of Les Blevins who wrote:
- Leslie W. Blevins Jr., et. al., comp. The Longhunters: A Report on the History and Family Of William Blevins Sr. of Virginia, Showing 25 Ascendants, and Uncounted Descendants. ISBN 978-4653-9999-1.