Need members with pre 1500 designation to help extend the Anne Couvent line

+5 votes
649 views

There are a number of profiles that can be extended providing someone with pre 1500 qualification is willing to work on these profiles. She falls under 

European Royals and Aristocrats project by way of ascension

WikiTree profile: Anne Couvent
in Genealogy Help by Joseph Lastowski G2G3 (3.3k points)

So with all these discussions into the validity and cross examination of the sources, some relevant and others lacking sufficient or convincing documentation.

One stands and wonders how any work from a number of these world renowned genealogist can survive and if the work was flawed why hasn’t work been done to correct the issues?

I see that there has been much discussion but no action and am constantly seeing their work sited and accepted even Denis Beauregard http://www.francogene.com/gfan/gfan/998/qrd30.htm

Whom is quoted and accepted as a reliable source for information and who many people on this site tend to cite him as their source, recognizes this line. http://www.francogene.com/gfan/gfan/998/qrd30.htm

When can we say we have enough information to proceed, not all records are going to have the holy grail of documentation, isn’t that why many have come to these conclusion? 

I do agree it is unacceptable to accept outright shoddy and irresponsible work, but not all assumptions are irresponsible, most are viewed as what I like to call relative probability:

noun

statistics

a measure or estimate of the degree of confidence one may have in the occurrence of an event, defined as the limit of the proportion observed in a sample as the sample size tends to infinity

Which is from what I gather is exactly what many genealogist have had to do in the absence of solid information.

The main genealogist of this site are, from what I see exceptional and I want nothing but confirmed work. 

So how are we to proceed if someone of your caliber doesn’t take up the torch and address this issue of inconstancy’s of acceptable works?

 If there is a list please direct me to it. If not please create such a page. I search constantly for reliable sources and it is a little disheartening when you come across a work you believe to be sound only to find it isn’t.

I don’t have the expertise and experience to discern the good from the bad, as is probably the case for many contributors to this project, and when I say this I'm referring to works done by genealogist.

As a retired accountant, I can tell you that you can make numbers say anything you please, so statistics are no way to operate.  

No matter how many authors may agree on something, it is not hard evidence.  Also, many of these authors will simply repeat what the earlier one said, with no or summary verification.  

Denis Beauregard states in his site which you quoted that he accepts the work of Gagné and Kokanosky and rejects the work of Longueval and Maricour.  That is what he has included in his database.

MSGCF, vol. 58, no 1, p. 17-58, Les origines de Philippe Amiot (Hameau), de son épouse Anne Couvent et de leur neveu Toussaint Ledran, par Roland-Yves Gagné et Laurent Kokanosky


La lignée par Jean-Antoine de LONGUEVAL, chevalier d'Haraucourt, et Anne de MARIDOR est rejetée.

He accepts the work of Gagné and Kok

osky and reject the one by Longueval and Maridor.

He accepts the work of 

The full and complete translation:

Denis Beauregard

MSGCF, vol. 58, No. 1, p. 17-58, The origins of Philippe Amiot (Hameau), his wife Anne Couvent and their nephew Toussaint Ledran , by Roland-Yves Gagné and Laurent Kokanosky


The line by Jean-Antoine LONGUEVAL, Knight of Haraucourt, and Anne de MARIDOR is rejected.

Lines in the database have been accepted.

COUVENT, Anne

AMIOT, Philippe

Sufficient documentation.

Other Information (s) / More about this family
Couple dating back to a king by 1 line / This couple descends from a King through 1 line.

Hmmm an 8th cousin.

sometimes it seems half Wikitree members are among my cousins.  laugh

No waysurprise...well at least if your ancestors came from Canadacool

Cuzsmiley

4 Answers

+8 votes
 
Best answer
The profile of Anne Couvent at the moment is a somewhat bilingual collection of notes.  It could become a model bilingual profile if (1) the material were turned into complete sentences rather than an outline, (2) the French language biography were followed by an English language translation, and (3) if there were a Research Notes section added to both languages capturing the excellent discussion here on which sources are followed and which are rejected!
by Jack Day G2G6 Pilot (462k points)
selected by Joseph Lastowski
in other words, turn the profile into a 'good' profile, à la Wikipedia 'good  article' criteria, which implies that the profile be inter alia 'well written'' in terms of text prose that is clear and concise, complies to some sort of writing style guideline, etc..
Jack, just to be clear, I suppose you mean Anne Couvent's profile?

The other, the Issenart profile, is just a stub which I clumsily attempted to clean up, quoting the work of Gagné and Kokanosky (respected researchers who conducted their research in situ using authentic contemporary documents) in an completely unconvincing manner. Though I did not mean to be unconvincing.
Yes, I just edited my post to clarify!  You may think the Issenart profile is clumsy, but it has complete sentences and a complete source citation!
Thank you Jack... seeing the amount of interest raised by this group of profiles, (and the high number of descendants of Anne Couvent), I decided to place some of the most crucial under project management.

Yes, there is an attempt of doing something with the Issenart profile, but though I would classify Gagné and Kokanosky's findings as "good secondary sources that cite primary sources" I have been unable to convey this. It would still be necessary to read the whole 50-page article, which requires an excellent eyesight, a lot of patience and good command of French. So... not sure I can do better than this, but I should (whenever I find time...).
I sent an email to one of my our cousins that reads French. Her ancestry profile only uses documentation.

Most of which is in French.
Hi Jack, ok, will get her done next, long job getting all the FDR done with full bilingual bios.
+5 votes

Working with pre-1500 profiles requires exceptional sources; preferably primary sources, or at least good secondary sources that cite primary sources.

I can see virtually no sources on these profiles that come anywhere near that quality.

There have also been a number of discussions about Anne Couvent's ancestry, including this one about Antoinette de Longueval which points out that there are no acceptable sources confirming many of these presumed relationships.

by John Atkinson G2G6 Pilot (620k points)
Thanks John, while the article of Gagné and Kokanosky includes a lot of interesting discussions and a number of references to contemporary documents, these would require a lot of skill to cite convincingly. And I would like to quote the wise conclusion of the article:

"Cette recherche illustre bien l'obligation des généalogistes à se rendre dans les différents dépôts d'archives et consulter sur place les actes authentiques pour réussir à construire une généalogie et ce, même au temps d'Internet".

While I have attempted to clean up existing profiles in this line, I would hesitate to create profiles on the indirect basis of Gagné and Kokanosky's report. (I do respect their work).

I appreciate you citing their work but how many people here can read French? 

Of those who can read, still less can translate with tolerable style, and I'm not one of them.

This research illustrates the need for genealogists to visit archives in person and consult authentic acts for themselves, in order to successfully build a genealogy, and this even in the time of the Internet.

"Cette recherche illustre bien l'obligation des généalogistes à se rendre dans les différents dépôts d'archives et consulter sur place les actes authentiques pour réussir à construire une généalogie et ce, même au temps d'Internet".

Translation:

This research truly shows the obligation of genealogists to go to the various archival depositories and to consult the authentic acts on site to be able to build a genealogy, and this, even at the time of the internet.

And for my own two bits, I would love to be able to work on her lineage credibly, but she was born across the Atlantic ocean from me, so consulting records is a tad wee difficult.  They are far from being all online.  And I have a vested interest, since she is among my 9th great-grandmothers.

She is also my 9th great grandmother and from what I have read her line was verified and held to scrutiny so I find it odd that there are issues
Haven't looked at this in a while, but basically the lineage is based on theory mostly, not hard evidence.  Too much theory and bold assertions make for bad genealogy.  

I had one ancestress whose son Jean Baptiste Terrien was said to have married a girl in Trois-Rivières.  I was following the family lines down, and something just did not compute for this premise.  For one thing, the supposed son, immediately after marriage (no parents named on marriage and no marriage contract), is found with his wife on Île d'Orléans, and his first two children have godfathers who bear the same last name as him.  Digging further found those same men being on Île d'Orléans all along, and to make a long story short, the Jean Baptiste Terrien in question was not the son of my ancestress, but of another couple, residents on Île d'Orléans.  Both Denis Beauregard and PRDH had him as son of my ancestress (Judith Rigaud).  I pointed out the discrepancies to them, Denis Beauregard actually found a record which confirmed my assertion of Jean's parentage, and corrected his records accordingly.  PRDH also made corrections to their database.

All that to illustrate that you want hard evidence before adding parents, particularly in French nobility lines, which unfortunately have gaps in available records.
John, though I have been unable to convey this, the source on the Issenart profile is really a secondary source that cites primary sources. I will not presume to judge if it is good or bad. Primary sources can be misinterpreted. The research report is unfortunately very difficult to read because of its bad typesetting and one must go to the last pages of the document to see something about the Montois/Issenart family.
One way to deal with whole lines, especially when the whole line has been presented in some work already, is to write it up in a free-space profile where one can present what others have presented and add research that shows what portions of the line may be credible and what portions may not.

I'm a Norwood descendant, and one can find Norwood lines reaching back from Captain John Norwood, a prominent immigrant to Anne Arundel County, Maryland, back to "Jordanus de Sheppey" who was alleged to be a son of Harold, England's last king before William the Conqueror.  In fact, one can find several varieties of this line.  Being a descendant, of course it interests me.  

It also interests me that some of the people in the line are well documented by people like Douglas Richardson -- and others are not.  In particular, WT does not have a profile for Jordanus de Sheppey.  If someone had uploaded him on a Gedcom back in our Wild West days, I'd be using the profile to try to find documentation for him, but I might end up needing to add him to the "Disproven Existence" collection.  

Times have changed on WT, and I have no factual basis for creating a profile for him.  But I'm still interested in finding out what is being said about Jordanus de Sheppey, and by whom.  So I created a free-space profile for the whole line.  It can link to the real profiles and be where I research the ones that are remaining.  One advantage of text is that one does not have to prematurely decide who parents are;  one can simply say that Smith says the parents are John and Mabel, but Jones says the parents are Samuel and Josephine.  

And in that free space profile I can develop all the information I can find for Jordanus de Sheppey without cluttering up the real person profiles.  And, who knows, I may find something new!
+3 votes

I know this discussion is 5 years old, but the time as come to finally come to terms with problematic speculative connections within the Anne Couvent lineage.

I have been adding over the last 2 months lines which extend the Couvent lines back based upon the extensive work of Charles Cawley of Medieval Lands, Gagné and Kokanosky, John DuLong, and others.

I have NOT extended lines which haven't been covered under their research without proper sourcing, like de Longueval. I don't feel confident in it at all when Gagné and Kokanosky couldn't even extend it and only provided bits and pieces without bonafide connections.

Despite the cloud that hovers over the ancestry of François de Joyeuse and his wife Nicole de Beauvais d'Autruche, I have chosen to add extensive research notes over time which present the concerns in a point by point fashion from Cawley and the response from John DuLong. I have put time into trying to make sense of the documentation presented for his wife Nicole, and so far I have hit dead ends. Her ancestry simply isn't supported by sourcing that is available to me and it is very unfortunate.

That being said, Anne Couvent without a doubt HAS royal and noble lineage which can be proven from her great great grandmother, Nicole des Ancherins. Her great grandfather, Geoffroy Issenart in a 5 April 1529 document:

"Geoffroy Issenart escuier seigneur de Landres est comparu en sa personne lequel a declaré et affirmé que les terres et seigneuries de Cornay et Fléville pour les trois quarts Sivry les Busancy Sommerence Baldrenge en la totalité e[t] ung huitiesme en la terre et seigneurie de Bourolles avec la moité dung bois appelé le bois de Cornay assis au finage dudict Bourolles et enplus la moityé de certain aultre boys assis aud finage de bourolles appelle le bois de Debat Le tout tenu et mouvant du roy notre Sire a cause de son chastel et chastellenye de Sainctemanehould lui comportent et appartiennent a cause de damoiselle Beatrix de Grant Pre sa femme a elle escheus tant par le trespas de feu Gobert de Grant Pre fils aisne de feu Edouart de Grant Pre en son vivant conte de Grant Pre que par le trespas de feue damoiselle Claude de Roucy sa mere excepte que le quart desd terres et seigneuries de Cornay et Fleville et la moityé de la tour et maison forte dudict Cornay lui comporte et appartient par appointement et accord fait entre luy et Loys de Pouilly pour ses interests courrus pour raison de la mort et occision de la personne de feu Guill[aum]e Issenart fils dudict Geoffroy tué et occis par ledict Loys de Pouilly desquelles terres et seigneuries il a joy et posseddé des quarante huit ans qu il a espouse ladicte damoiselle Beatrix sa femme et dudict quart de Cornay Fleville . . . en date du cinquiesme jour d avril lan mill cinq cens vingt neuf"

The line of Grandpré has an extensive history which is well documented. I have recently discovered that the de la Porte family, which became Saintignon and later a branch became Ancherins, was one of the three "Lignages de Verdun" which were ardent supporters of the House of Grandpré in the 13th and 14th centuries.

Until further documentation can be found regarding the de Joyeuse and Beauvais d'Autruche lines, we just don't really know. We can, however, support the Grandpré lineage with documentation.

I have created a new project, the Anne Couvent Lineage Project, to help with her ancestral profiles and sort out what is what.

Darrell E. Larocque (Larocque-466)

by Darrell Larocque G2G6 Mach 1 (11.5k points)
hi Darrell, have you created a space page for this?  If yes, then it would be good to add a link here to that page.  Those interested can then follow along and give comments etc.
Just added! Thanks for the suggestion!

Darrell
+6 votes
I have now created a project and brick wall subpage for Anne Couvent:

https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Space:Anne_Couvent_Lineage_Project

https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Space:Anne_Couvent_Ancestral_Profile_Brick_Walls

I have been updating the Brick Walls list as I have been going along translating French sources. Here is the page for those sources:

https://www.wikitree.com/index.php?title=Space:Anne_Couvent_Lineage_Project_Sources

Darrell E. Larocque
by Darrell Larocque G2G6 Mach 1 (11.5k points)
edited by Darrell Larocque
Thanks Darrell, unfortunately, although I definitely have an interest in this, time and existing workload preclude me doing much on it, unless it's reviewing translations once in a while.  For which I am available.
Most of the issues come up with annotations/superscript and subscript within the text. I'm getting better at it!

I am also going to create a source subpage so all of the sources I use are in one place.

Related questions

+2 votes
0 answers
+11 votes
3 answers
381 views asked Feb 28, 2018 in The Tree House by Jim LaBossiere G2G6 Mach 3 (35.9k points)
+5 votes
2 answers
+13 votes
4 answers
+8 votes
2 answers
373 views asked Mar 14, 2018 in Genealogy Help by Chris Ferraiolo G2G6 Pilot (768k points)
+20 votes
4 answers

WikiTree  ~  About  ~  Help Help  ~  Search Person Search  ~  Surname:

disclaimer - terms - copyright

...