Ruth Brownson was born on 25 Dec 1710 in New Milford Twp, Litchfield, Connecticut, Father's name "Rogger" Brownson[1].
LNAB controversy: Many trees on other websites show her LNAB as Bronson but both birth and marriage records list her name as Brownson. Father and siblings LNAB is also Brownson.
Marriage record:
Hough, Benjamin, son of Jonathan and Abigail Hough m. Ruth, dau of Roger Brownson, Aug. 22, 1738 in New Milford, Litchfield, Connecticut[2]
She died before August 1752 in New Milford, Litchfield, Conn.
Roger Brownson was town clerk of New Milford from Nov 1, 1733 (taking over from his brother Samuel, who died the last week of October, 1733) to Dec 12, 1748.
Child of Benjamin Hough and Ruth Brownson is:
Noah Hough, born February 05, 1738/39 in New Milford, Litchfield, Connecticut[3], and died February 09, 1738/39 in New Milford, Litchfield, Conn.
Roger Brownson, Ruth’s father, remained the New Milford town clerk for almost 10 more years after the birth and death of Noah — no additional children were recorded from this marriage.
On 10 Apr 1752 in New Milford, Ruth Huff (probable widow of Benjamin) married (2) Ezra Terrill[4] son of Rodger and Sarah____.
Children:
Mary Huff b. 24 Jun 1748 New Milford, Connecticut[5][6], d. 30 Jan 1824 at age 75[7]
Notes:
Benjamin purchased land in Cornwall in 1739 or 1740 from the owner of an original allotment in that new town. Benjamin was on the Cornwall tax list in 1742, but in 1744 he was “gone,” and the lot was sold by Z. (Zephaniah, his brother) Hough shortly afterwards. Benjamin probably died between 1742 and 1744, certainly before 1748. A Ruth Huff had a child, Mary, on June 24, 1748, recorded in New Milford, but had no husband at the time. There was no Ruth Huff/Hough around New Milford except the wife of Benjamin, evidently then a widow. Ruth Huff later married Ezra Terrill in New Milford on April 10, 1752. She didn’t live much longer, as Ezra Terrill again married on August 31 of that same year to Judith Hamelton. To set things straight, Ezra made an affidavit on December 25 of that same year that Ruth Huff’s daughter Mary (then 4 years old) was his child and heir to his estate.
Sources
↑ "Connecticut Births and Christenings, 1649-1906," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:F7WX-VXL : 11 February 2018), Ruth Brownson, 25 Dec 1710; citing ; FHL microfilm unknown.
↑ History of New Milford and Bridgewater, Connecticut
↑ "Connecticut Births and Christenings, 1649-1906," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:F749-YQD : 11 February 2018), Benjamin Hough in entry for Noah Hough, 05 Feb 1738; citing ; FHL microfilm unknown.
↑
Connecticut Town Birth Records, pre-1870 (Barbour Collection)
New Milford Vital Records
↑ "Connecticut Births and Christenings, 1649-1906," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:F7WJ-RY9 : 11 February 2018), Ruth Huff in entry for Mary Huff, 24 Jun 1748; citing ; FHL microfilm unknown.
↑
Connecticut Town Birth Records, pre-1870 (Barbour Collection)
↑ Connecticut Town Death Records, pre-1870 (Barbour Collection)
Hough, William W., "The Descendants of Jonathan Hough of Connecticut, Youngest Son of William and Sarah (Calkins) Hought", Connecticut Nutmegger (Connecticut Society of Genealogists, Glastonbury, Conn., 2012) Vol. 45, Page 202
Jacobus, Donald Lines. The Terrill Family of Connecticut, The American Genealogist (New Haven, Conn., 1949) Vol. 25, Page 42
Is Ruth your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or
contact
a profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Ruth by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Ruth:
Bronson-755 and Brownson-78 appear to represent the same person because: Now that changes were made to delink the wrong husband, they can now be merged as the same person
Brownson-78 and Bronson-755 do not represent the same person because: Most of the data for Ruth (Brownson) Hough, her husband Benjamin Hough and their children are not in agreement. Too many discrepancies for a merger. They only had one child, Noah per CT Town Records and her father Rodger Brownson was the town clerk.