John Clarke Jr, son of John Clarke Sr. and Ann Dent, was born about 1670 in St. Mary’s County, Maryland. He married Elizabeth Mattingly about 1703 in St. Mary’s County, Maryland. He died September 1, 1756 in Charles County, Maryland.
Child of John Clarke Jr. and Elizabeth Mattingly
A) Mary Ann Clarke b 1708 d 1743.
John Clarke Records
The date of birth of John Clarke was from MyHeritage: John Clarke was born about 1670 in SMC MD.
The parents of John Clarke were from MyHeritage: John Clarke was the son of John Clarke and Ann Dent.
The parents of John Clarke were from the Will of John Clarke: Clarke, John, St. Mary's Co, 28 Nov, 1685; 6 March, 1686. To 5 children: viz., John, Robert, Benjamin, Franklin, and Ann: 1,000 Acres at Matting in equal portions. In event of death of any under 18 years of age or without issue: deceased's portion to pass to survivors or their heirs. Wife Ann, executrix, and residuary legatee of estate: real and personal: additional estate to pass to eldest son, if living. Testators: Thomas Clarke, George Turner, Lewes Gest. 4. 193.
The marriage of John Clarke and Elizabeth Mattingly was from MyHeritage: John Clarke and Elizabeth Mattingly were married about 1703 in SMC MD.
The death of John Clarke was from MyHeritage: John Clarke died about 1728 in SMC MD.
Elizabeth Mattingly was born about 1681 in SMC MD. She died 7 Jun 1732 in SMC MD. From Find A Grave: Elizabeth Mattingly Clarke. Birth: unknown. She died about 1732 in SMC MD. She was the daughter of Thomas Mattingly and Mary Elizabeth Curtis Suttle.
From Find A Grave: John Clarke. Birth: unknown. Death: Jan 1728 in SMC MD. He was the son of John Clarke. Spouse: Elizabeth Mattingly Clarke. Children: Henrietta Clarke Spalding.
Sources
The parents of John Clarke were from the Will of John Clarke: Clarke, John, St. Mary's Co, 28 Nov, 1685; 6 March, 1686. To 5 children: viz., John, Robert, Benjamin, Franklin, and Ann: 1,000 Acres at Matting in equal portions. In event of death of any under 18 years of age or without issue: deceased's portion to pass to survivors or their heirs. Wife Ann, executrix, and residuary legatee of estate: real and personal: additional estate to pass to eldest son, if living. Testators: Thomas Clarke, George Turner, Lewes Gest. 4. 193.
Contribution by Rob Schnautz, Saturday, June 7, 2014.
This profile is a collaborative work-in-progress. Can you contribute information or sources?
Is John your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or
contact
a profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with John by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known yDNA or mtDNA test-takers in his direct paternal or maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with John:
Clarke-4413 and Clarke-8579 appear to represent the same person because: They match on everything besides DoB.
1642 is (probably) too early for John Clark(e) to be born (John would be 60+ when he (first) married and started having children w/ Henrietta)? Doubtful. And that earlier (Clarke-4413) profile lacks any sources on DoB and has no other info sourced. BD of c1670 makes much more sense and profile is fleshed out better.
Please merge newer profile into old one. As it is now this Spalding/Clark(e) area is a complete mess. (John Clarke is not the only problem, but it's a start.)
Clarke-1998 and Clarke-8579 appear to represent the same person because: Though the death dates are different, it appears that this is the same person. They both have the same father, etc
1642 is (probably) too early for John Clark(e) to be born (John would be 60+ when he (first) married and started having children w/ Henrietta)? Doubtful. And that earlier (Clarke-4413) profile lacks any sources on DoB and has no other info sourced. BD of c1670 makes much more sense and profile is fleshed out better.
Please merge newer profile into old one. As it is now this Spalding/Clark(e) area is a complete mess. (John Clarke is not the only problem, but it's a start.)