David (Fiske) Fisk
Privacy Level: Open (White)

David (Fiske) Fisk (1697 - 1748)

David Fisk formerly Fiske
Born in Watertown, Massachusetts Bay Colonymap
Ancestors ancestors
Husband of — married [date unknown] [location unknown]
Husband of — married 25 Dec 1723 in Windham, Connecticutmap
Descendants descendants
Died at age 50 in Windham, Connecticutmap
Profile last modified | Created 12 Feb 2012
This page has been accessed 791 times.

Biography

David Fiske is #393 in the Fiske and Fisk family: ... This book tells a rather fanciful story about this branch of the family traveling with Hooker to Windham, Connecticut and dropping the "e" from Fiske. Perhaps this branch of the family did drop the "e." David's birth record uses it, but the printed records for Connecticut (Barbour collection) make no spelling distinctions. However, Thomas Hooker settled Hartford (Connecticut) in 1636, two generations before David went to the town of Windham, which was not settled until the late 1670's.

David Fiske, son of John Fisske and Abigail, was born in Watertown, Massachusetts, 13 April 1697.[1][2]

David married 25 Dec 1723 in Windham, Connecticut Elizabeth Durkee.[2]or Durge[3]

He was a farmer, residing in Windham Connecticut..[2] He d. Mar. 25, 1748.[2][3] He made a will 10 March 1748, signing with his mark, which was duly presented in court and his estate was divided 1/2 to Elizabeth, his wife, David, the eldest son, received 2/5 of remaining 1/2 and Jonathan, Asa, Elizabeth each received 1/5 of the 1/2[4]

  1. David b. Nov. 3, 1724;[2][3] d. Nov. 24, 1724.[2][3]
  2. DAVID, b. Dec. 17, 1726;[2][3] m. Sarah Farnam.[2][3]
  3. JOHN, b. Aug. 27, 1729;[2][3] d. Mar. 3, 1734/5.[2][3]
  4. JONATHAN, b. July 4, 1731;[2][3] m. Elizabeth Scott[2][3] and Sarah Leach.[2]
  5. ASA, b. May 28, 1733;[3], Pierce has the 26th[2] m. Elizabeth Knight.[2][3]
  6. ELIZABETH, b. Mar. 6, 1735/6;[2][3] m. May 14, 1752, Samuel Webb.[2][3]
  7. JOHN, b. Apr. 17, 1738;[2][3] d. May 31, 1742.[2][3]
  8. AMAZIAH, b. Feb. 15, 1741/22;[2][3] d. Aug. 19, 1745.[2][3]

Sources

  1. Watertown Records Comprising The Third Book of Town Proceedings and the Second Book of Births Marriages and Deaths to End of 1737 Also Plan and Register of Burials in Arlington Street Burying Ground Watertown, Mass: 1900. p. 9
  2. 2.00 2.01 2.02 2.03 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.07 2.08 2.09 2.10 2.11 2.12 2.13 2.14 2.15 2.16 2.17 2.18 2.19 2.20 Pierce, Frederick Clifton. Fiske and Fisk family : being the record of the descendants of Symond Fiske, lord of the manor of Stadhaugh, Suffolk County, England, from the time of Henry IV to date, including all the American members of the family (Chicago: 1896) https://archive.org/stream/fiskefiskfamilyb00pier#page/114/mode/2up p.114
  3. 3.00 3.01 3.02 3.03 3.04 3.05 3.06 3.07 3.08 3.09 3.10 3.11 3.12 3.13 3.14 3.15 3.16 3.17 White, Lorraine Cook, ed. The Barbour Collection of Connecticut Town Vital Records. Vol. 1-55. "Windham" p. 123. Baltimore, MD, USA: Genealogical Publishing Co., 1994-2002.
  4. Ancestry.com. Connecticut, Wills and Probate Records, 1609-1999 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2015. Original data: Connecticut County, District and Probate Courts.






Is David your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with David by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known yDNA or mtDNA test-takers in his direct paternal or maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with David:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.

Images: 1
David Fisk Image 1
David Fisk Image 1



Comments: 2

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
The match proposed by Matchbot seems to be accurate. The LNAB should probably be Fiske with Current last name Fisk because according to the book "Fiske and Fisk family", p. 114 he "dropped the final e from the family name".
posted by Jamie Nelson
Fiske-803 and Fiske-400 appear to represent the same person because: Same David Fiske b. Apr 13 1697 d. Dec 25 1723
posted by Charles Patterson

F  >  Fiske  |  F  >  Fisk  >  David (Fiske) Fisk