Peter Gleane is the son of alderman Thomas Gleane of Norwich, who acquired Hardwick, and Alice, daughter of Robert Wolmer of Shottisham, Suffolk.
Marriage
m. (1584) Maud (d. ante 07 May 1633), dau. of Robert Suckling of St. Andrews, Norwich. Issue:
Thomas of Harwick.[1] m. Elizabeth, dau. of Thomas Brewse of Topcroft
Mary
Occupation
1610: Sheriff of Norwich
1615: Mayor of Norwich.
13 Jun 1624: knighted
1628-29: MP for Norwich
Research Notes
Peter Gleane's Parliamentary biography is here on History of Parliament online.
"Family and Education
bap. 27 June 1564, o.s. of Thomas Gleane of Norwich, alderman and draper or mercer, and Alice, da. of Robert Wolmer of Shottisham, Suff. educ. BA Clare, Camb. m. 1584, Maud (d. bef. 7 May 1633), da. of Robert Suckling of St. Andrew’s, Norwich, 3s. 2da. suc. fa. 1602; kntd. 13 June 1624. bur. 10 May 1633."
Sources
↑ Thomas is the father of Peter, BT (see: GLEANE, Sir Peter, 1st Bt. (1619-96), of Hardwick, Norf. HOP).[1]
GLEANE, Sir Peter (1564-1633), of St. Peter Mancroft, Norwich, Norf. HOP. Web.[2]
Cambridge University Alumni, 1261-1900 Author Ancestry.com Publisher Online publication - Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 1999.Original data - Venn, J. A., comp.. Alumni Cantabrigienses. London, England: Cambridge University Press, 1922-1954.Original data: Venn, J. A., comp.. Alumni Cantabrigienses. London, Eng
England, Select Births and Christenings, 1538-1975
England, Select Deaths and Burials, 1538-1991
England, Select Marriages, 1538–1973
Norfolk Record Office; Norwich, Norfolk, England; Reference: PD 26/16
Norfolk, England, Church of England Baptism, Marriages, and Burials, 1535-1812
Norfolk, England, Extracted Parish Records
UK and Ireland, Find A Grave Index, 1300s-Current
Note - contrary to the Pettus pedigree chart (from Blomefield), he was not a baronet - the baronetcy was bought in 1666 by his grandson Peter, b. 1619, also an MP.
Is Peter your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or contact
the profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
King-3125 and King-15550 appear to represent the same person because: These profiles are the same with relatives & places in common. The merge should be reversed; King-15550 into King-3125. Please merge these as appropriate.
Cordially. Dick Ragland
Thanks, Cindy Williams Lesure