no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Hannah (Hunt) Pinckney (1655 - 1698)

Hannah Pinckney formerly Hunt
Born in Connecticutmap [uncertain]
Ancestors ancestors
Daughter of [uncertain] and [uncertain]
Wife of — married 1680 in East Chester, Westchester, New Yorkmap
Descendants descendants
Died at about age 43 in Eastchester, Westchester, New York Provincemap
Problems/Questions Profile manager: Bill Catambay private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 22 Apr 2013
This page has been accessed 594 times.

Biography

When Hannah Hunt was born in 1655 in Eastchester, New York, her father, Thomas, was about 45[1].

She married Thomas Pinckney by 1680 in Westchester, New York[2]. She died in 1698 in her hometown at the age of 43[3][4][5]

Married 1680 Children William (1680-1755) Jane (1712-1777) Thomas (1683-1777) Philip (1685-1716) Isabell (1686-) Jonathan Thomas (1687-1777) Hannah (1690-1750)

Acknowledgments

Thank you to Gary Teel for creating WikiTree profile Hunt-4558 through the import of Teel.ged on Apr 17, 2013.


Sources

  1. Northamptonshire, England, Church of England Baptisms, Marriages and Burials, 1532-1812
  2. North America, Family Histories, 1500-2000
  3. New York, Wills and Probate Records, 1659-1999
  4. Record of her death not found 10/5/2019 in a search of the cited database.
  5. death in 1698 reported in her husband's findagrave memorial # 64724092, no source other than tombstone which appears illegible

See Also:

  • U.S. and International Marriage Records, 1560-1900




Is Hannah your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message the profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Hannah by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Hannah:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 3

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Hannah may have been born in 1655, but not in Eastchester, which was not settled until 1666. Her father-in-law Philip Pinckney was one of the founders.

And is there support for her being the daughter of Thomas and Cecily Hunt (of Westchester town) ?? Most sources I've looked at list only four sons and one daughter Abigail, no Hannah and no Elizabeth.

posted by Halsey Bullen
UNKNOWN-59495 and Hunt-4558 do not represent the same person because: Different children, different dates, and unknown parents on one. There are many Pinckney's in colonial times, and many first name Hannah's.
posted by Bill Catambay
UNKNOWN-59495 and Hunt-4558 appear to represent the same person because: Hunt profile has parents and other relatives, similar dates and same husband (merge proposed)

H  >  Hunt  |  P  >  Pinckney  >  Hannah (Hunt) Pinckney