Sarah Schooley was the second child of Thomas and Sarah and born 1692. She married Samuel Shinn, son of Thomas and Mary Stocton Shinn in 1718.[1][2][3] The Shinn family lived in Springfield township in Burlington County, New Jersey. Sarah died in 1733. Their daughters Mary and Alice Shinn were mentioned in the will of Sarah's father 1723/ 4.[4] She gave Samuel seven children.[citation needed]
Sources
↑Ancestry (https://ancestry.com : accessed 31 August 2018), database with images, "U.S., Quaker Meeting Records, 1681-1935" > New Jersey > Burlington > Chesterfield Monthly Meeting > Men´s Minutes, 1684-1738 > image 87 of 191 for Samuel Shin, pg 164 (bottom left); Swarthmore College; Swarthmore, Pennsylvania; Men's Minutes, 1684-1738; Collection: Quaker Meeting Records; Call Number: MR-PH-110
↑Satterthwaite Pdf pg 293 from Minutes of Chesterfield Monthly Meeting of Friends
Declarations of Intentions of Marriages Liber A of Minutes Pg 164 Samuel Shin belonging to Burlington Mo. Mtg. and Sarah Scholey, daughter of Thomas Scholey, declare intentions of marriage 3 Mo. 1, 1718. 4 Mo. 4, 1718 the meeting gives consent.
WikiTree profile Schooley-93 created through the import of Moorman Lemp Family (1).ged on Oct 6, 2011 by Stephanie M. See the Changes page for the details of edits by Stephanie and others.
Is Sarah your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or contact
the profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Sarah by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Sarah:
Scholey-3 and Schooley-20 appear to represent the same person because: Same name and marriage. In this case, we probably want to merge INTO Schooley-20. I am in process of researching, and preliminary findings are that the spelling found most often is "Schooley with 2 "O's" So just in this kink of case we want to merge into the higher number. The idea is to "Merge into the lowest numbered profile with the correct spelling of the last name at birth." So, if we decide that "Schooley" is the correct spelling, then the number dies not matter in this case. The target profile for all merges will be Schooley-20
Thanks!