Comments on Mary Kettle

Question

On 17 Oct 2021 Gio Ponzetta wrote on Kettle-350:

Hi Patricia, I found the suggestion "Error - 305: Mother is too young or not born The mother was either not born or under ten years old at the birth date shown. Either a birth date or the relationship is incorrect. " It says here Mary was born in 1737 and Hugh (son?) In 1745. Even that Mary Kettle was married to [[Larkin-802|Deacon John Larkin]]  I am not aware of. This ancestor of mine was certainly married to Ruth Kettel, and has a documented profile. Can you help me understand better? Thanks in advance, Gio

Answer 1

Maybe, but the dates cannot be correct. If Mary was born in 1737 and Hugh was her son born in 1745, then she gave birth at 8 years of age. One of those birthdates is wrong, or that particulsr Mary is not his mother.

Answer 2

for the same mistake I separated the son Larkin-1795 from the father Larkin-802.

  I stopped in front of separating the son from the mother Kettle-350 because I am uncertain about the right steps:

that is if it is not better to first separate the wife Kettle-350 (without source) from the husband Larkin-802 whose real wife is Ruth Kettell

  Larkin-802 is a notable profile