He became a Jesuit and emigrated to Madrid and had no wife and no known issue.[1][2][3]
Sources
↑Paul, James Balfour. "The Scots Peerage : founded on Wood's ed. of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland; containing an historical and genealogical account of the nobility of that kingdom", Edinburgh: David Douglas,1910, Vol. VII, Archive.org,
pp. 557
Is James your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or contact
the profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships.
Paternal line Y-chromosome DNA test-takers:
This might be a conflated profile. James the son of Hugh was a Jesuit priest. My grandfather was a Jesuit priest as well so I will not be one to argue that it precludes him from having had children. I should not that it seems odd that he would have married a year before entering the priesthood.
James, son of Hugh, was sent to Madrid in 1669. James, husband of Margaret, had a son also named James in 1661 and that son married in Scotland in 1689. This implies the younger James remained in Scotland and makes it less credible that his father was a Jesuit priest living in Madrid.
Although there is DNA matches suggestive of a relationship, they are neither the results of triangulation nor of solid genealogical records and can be ignore except to say that the correcting the specifics surrounding this James (or these two conflated Jame's) could still be a valid biological relationship.
Featured German connections:
James is
17 degrees from Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, 22 degrees from Dietrich Bonhoeffer, 21 degrees from Lucas Cranach, 20 degrees from Stefanie Graf, 17 degrees from Wilhelm Grimm, 20 degrees from Fanny Hensel, 24 degrees from Theodor Heuss, 16 degrees from Alexander Mack, 32 degrees from Carl Miele, 12 degrees from Nathan Rothschild, 18 degrees from Hermann Friedrich Albert von Ihering and 14 degrees from Ferdinand von Zeppelin
on our single family tree.
Login to see how you relate to 33 million family members.
James, son of Hugh, was sent to Madrid in 1669. James, husband of Margaret, had a son also named James in 1661 and that son married in Scotland in 1689. This implies the younger James remained in Scotland and makes it less credible that his father was a Jesuit priest living in Madrid.
Although there is DNA matches suggestive of a relationship, they are neither the results of triangulation nor of solid genealogical records and can be ignore except to say that the correcting the specifics surrounding this James (or these two conflated Jame's) could still be a valid biological relationship.