Contents |
NOTE: If anyone has access to the Frink Family Genealogical Reference Book, they might better be able to verify one way or another if the following "documentation" supports the theory(ies) or nullifies them.
This all started because a comment was posted on Ephraim Wheeler's profile stating that "The Grant Family (1898) purports that Hannah Elizabeth Miner was born Nov. 22, 1819, at N. Stonington, daughter of John Owen Miner & Nancy Brown. Veracity of that information should be probed," by John French Ph.D. The reference cited here has been determined thus far to be incorrect, thus the suggestion by Dr. French to probe its veracity was apt. The short version of the research results of this is that neither John Owen Miner Sr (son of Simeon Miner Jr.) nor Jr are the father of this Hannah Miner. Longer version, both Miner men married into the Avery Family. While it is possible there was a remarriage, as John Owen Jr died in 1859, and his wife, died in 1887, (Note: she is listed in History of Stonington as Adeline Avery). Nancy Brown cannot be this Hannah's mother and was never married to John Owen Jr. Who the Nancy Brown that is referred to in The Grant Family the Profile Manager has not been able to ascertain, as there just is not enough information on her.[1][2][3]
For further clarity the timeline for both John Owen Miner Sr and Jr is as follows:
Barbour Collection for John Owen Miner Sr and Jr |
John O. Miner, son of Charles Miner, of Stonington, did marry a Nancy Brown on 5 Apr 1812, in North Stonington. However, records indicate that they only had two children. [4][5][6]
The Grant Family: A Genealogical History of the Descendants of Matthew Grant of Windsor-Connecticut, 1601-1898 is wrong. Neither of the parents listed are the parent of the Hannah Miner that married Ephraim Wheeler.
The only actual "sources" that have been located are US Census Records. References are the different Genealogical Books published by various family members, a very long time ago. Finding a person requires knowing more about them than just knowing their name, and sometimes "just a marriage record is totally insufficient, as was this case with this/these Hannah(s).
Once establishing that the The Grant Family reference was wrong, the journey in discovering who the real Hannah Miner was went through a lot of weird twists and turns, and it was necessary to start lower in the tree, with their daughter Ellen Rebecca (Wheeler) Frink, as there just wasn't anything other than a marriage recording in the Christian Secretary on Hannah, that was definitive. And this newspaper listing has not been able to be verified, nor did it state more than just her name. It does support the claim made in History of Stonington and Wheeler Family in America.[13][14]
Christian Secretary Listing of Marriage of Ephraim Wheeler to Hannah Miner 23 Nov 1835. |
The first census that shows any information besides the land owner/tenant is the 1850 US Census. For the Hannah married to Ephraim Wheeler, lists their daughter Ellen Rebecca Wheeler as age 13. It also lists Ephraim Wheeler (the younger), her half-brother from her father's second marriage. This indicates that it is the correct US Census and that it backs up the information found in the Family References to be correct. It is also worth noting, if it weren't for their daughter, the research probably would have died right here.[15]
Ephraim Wheeler died 26 Jun 1851, so finding him on the 1860 Census wouldn't happen, but the search was for the daughter who would be about 23 years old.
Note: This is where the "theories" come into the picture.
In that Census Ellen Rebecca Wheeler, age 23, is living with Hannah E., last name Frink, who is married to William P. Frink. This lead to researching the possibility that Hannah E. Miner, widow of Ephraim Wheeler remarried after the death of her husband.[16]
In some cases records/references will somehow connect the dots, but not in this case. So another turn in the research was required. There is a record of William Pitts Frink marrying Hannah E. Wheeler. The Wheeler parents of the Hannah Wheeler who married William could not be found, so the theory, based on first names of the wife matching (with the middle initial E) is that Hannah married a second time to William Pitts Frink, with her daughter of 23, from her first marriage, living with them becomes a basis of the theory.
Marriage of Hannah E. Wheeler to William Pitts Frink. |
In further researching through the US Census avenue, for the 1870 Census, looking for the daughter Ellen Rebecca (Wheeler) Frink, Ellen went from "Wheeler" to Frink, so a marriage record for her was sought, and found. She married George Henry Frink, 22 Feb 1868 in North Stonington, two years prior to the 1870 Census. So finding her with her mother, Hannah, and step-father William Pitts Frink at her father-in-law's, (Pitts Downer Frink) house, in Stonington, would not be unusual.
1870 US Census, possibly the home of Pitts Downer Frink, or William Frink, (This Census was taken on 22 Jun 1870). |
While making the above photo of the 1870 US Census, another 1870 Census was discovered, in which it appears that the daughter, Ellen Rebecca (Wheeler) Frink, may have been counted twice, as shown below, she appears to be at home with her husband George Henry Frink.
1870 US Census, George Henry Frink Household (This Census was taken on 30 Jun 1870). |
The fact that each Census was taken 8 days apart adds weight to the theory that Ellen was counted twice.
Hannah is found at home with her husband and her daughter, in Stonington, in the 1880 US Census, thus keeping some cohesion to the theories previously stated. This Census was taken on 18 Jun 1880. This is important to mention only because her daughter was counted on 1 Jun 1880 at home with her husband, 17 days prior.[17][18]
Even with these arguments, the daughter, Ellen Rebecca (Wheeler) Frink, appears to be the glue, as her age remained consistent through all four census years.
If the dots have been properly connected, and the theory that the widow of Ephraim Wheeler did in fact marry William P. Frink, this would explain the answer as to why Hannah was not buried with her husband Ephraim Wheeler, as his first two wives were. This was the profile manager's first question.
This would also mean that the information in the Hale Collection would also hold true (though the year of birth could still be questioned since it's about 3 years off of the census data from the 1850 and 1880). The date of birth for Hannah, comes from the Hale Collection, as 21 Nov 1815, and her date of death as 7 Jun 1897. And she is buried with her second husband, William P. Frink, in the Frink and Williams Cemetery, in Stonington.[19]
Note: It is important to note that whether or not, this is true of the Hannah Miner that married Ephraim Wheeler, it does remain true for the Hannah that married William P. Frink if records are ever found that they are two separate people. Should the theory prove to be false all references to the Hannah who married Ephraim Wheeler should be removed.
Hale Collection Record of DOB and DOD of Hannah E Miner and William P Frink. |
Her daughter's story, while much more concrete, is also a very interesting one.
Featured Asian and Pacific Islander connections: Hannah is 22 degrees from 今上 天皇, 18 degrees from Adrienne Clarkson, 23 degrees from Dwight Heine, 23 degrees from Dwayne Johnson, 19 degrees from Tupua Tamasese Lealofioaana, 20 degrees from Stacey Milbern, 19 degrees from Sono Osato, 31 degrees from 乾隆 愛新覺羅, 22 degrees from Ravi Shankar, 24 degrees from Taika Waititi, 22 degrees from Penny Wong and 16 degrees from Chang Bunker on our single family tree. Login to see how you relate to 33 million family members.
M > Miner | F > Frink > Hannah E (Miner) Frink
Categories: North Stonington, Connecticut | Frink and Williams Cemetery, Stonington, Connecticut | Stonington, Connecticut One Place Study