Mary, daughter of John Haynes & Mary, was baptised on 17 December 1721 in St Giles without Cripplegate, London, England.[1]
Mary married Samuel Miller on 30 June 1743 in St Giles without Cripplegate, London, England.[2]
Mary's son Wm Miller was baptised on 28 August 1748 in Bishopsgate, London, England.[3]
Mary's daughter Sarah Miller was baptised on 11 May 1750 in Bishopsgate, London, England.[4]
Sources
↑Baptism:
"England Births and Christenings, 1538-1975"
citing Digital film/folder number: 007905495; FHL microfilm: 380206
FamilySearch Record: JMWV-RDD (accessed 13 November 2023)
Mary Haynes baptism on 17 Dec 1721, daughter of John Haynes & Mary, in St Giles without Cripplegate, London, England, United Kingdom.
↑Marriage:
"England Marriages, 1538–1973"
citing Digital film/folder number: 007905496; FHL microfilm: 380207
FamilySearch Record: NV16-Z83 (accessed 13 November 2023)
Mary Haines marriage to Samuel Miller on 30 Jun 1743 in St Giles without Cripplegate, London, England, United Kingdom.
↑Baptism of son Wm Miller:
"England Births and Christenings, 1538-1975"
citing Digital film/folder number: 008005362; FHL microfilm: 380143
FamilySearch Record: NLNC-Y76 (accessed 13 November 2023)
Mary's son Wm Miller baptism on 28 Aug 1748 in Bishopsgate, London, England, United Kingdom.
↑Baptism of daughter Sarah Miller:
"England Births and Christenings, 1538-1975"
citing Digital film/folder number: 008005362; FHL microfilm: 380143
FamilySearch Record: JMQT-1BD (accessed 13 November 2023)
Mary's daughter Sarah Miller baptism on 11 May 1750 in Bishopsgate, London, England, United Kingdom.
Ancestry Family Tree - Miller (Tim Miller)
Ancestry Family Tree - Miller (Ford Jean)
Is Mary your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or contact
the profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Mary by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Mary: