Harriet Hutchings was baptized on 20 April 1800[1] in Moretonhampstead[2] in Devon. Her father's name was Samuel, but unfortunately the baptism register does not record her mother's name.
The Moretonhampstead History Society[3] kindly provides an online facility for searching baptisms, marriages and burials in Moretonhampstead[4], and it shows two marriages of men named Samuel Hutchings who might have been Harriet's father: Samuel Hutchings married Mary Soby on 5 January 1788, and Samuel Hutchings married Betty Matthews on 6 October 1788.
Searching Moretonhampstead baptisms of children with surname Hutchings uncovers twelve with father's name Samuel:
We can deduce that both couples married in 1788 had children, and Harriet could have been the daughter of either of them.
According to Devon Family History Society transcriptions, now available through findmypast.co.uk, a John Langbride and a Harriet Hutchings were married in Dunsford[5], Devon, on 4 April 1823.
John and Harriet Langbridge had the following children:
The Moretonhampstead History Society[12] kindly provides an online facility for searching baptisms, marriages and burials in Moretonhampstead[13], giving more information than provided by the FamilySearch transcriptions. In particular we discover that, according to the baptism register entries, John Langbridge was a husbandman at the time of the baptism of his first son John, a collier at the time of the baptism of his second son John, an innkeeper at the time of the baptism of his daughter Harriet, and a husbandman again when Mary Ann and William were baptized. We also learn that the first John was 11 days old at his death.
John Langbridge of Moretonhampstead, and formerly of Dunsford, Charcoal Burner and Victualler, is named in The London Gazette of 20 June 1828 as one of seventeen insolvent debtors whose petitions are to be heard in Exeter on 11 July 1828[14]. And similarly, five years on, John Langbridge, formerly of Moreton Hampstead, Devonshire, then of Totnes, Devonshire, and late of Moreton Hampstead aforesaid, Stone-Cutter and Victualler, is named in The London Gazette of 15 February 1833 as one of the insolvent debtors whose petitions are to be heard in Exeter on 11 March 1833[15].
Let us interrupt Harriet's biography with a brief account of a noteworthy event in the history of Moretonhampstead. It is interesting in its own right, and does give us a little information about Harriet Langbridge.
Jonathan May was murdered near Moretonhampstead on 16 July 1835. The case is notable for the fact that—in a rare example of the British justice system conceding that it made a mistake—one of the two men convicted of the crime was pardoned 43 years later, and awarded £1000 compensation for wrongful conviction.
Harriet Langbridge gave evidence in the case, her testimony helping to convict the innocent man.
Jonathan May, a farmer, was waylaid by two thugs, robbed and killed, while returning home at night, having attended the fair in Moretonhampstead. The murderers were one Thomas Oliver, known as Buckingham Joe, and his companion, known as Turpin. Thomas Oliver and Edmund Galley were tried and convicted.
Before he was hanged, Buckingham Joe confessed his guilt, but Edmund Galley maintained that he was not Turpin, and had never been in Devon before 1836. Joe corroborated this, saying that he had never met Galley until they were in Exeter gaol awaiting trial.
Harriet Langbridge was one of several witnesses who Identified Galley as the Turpin who had been Joe's companion at Moretonhampstead fair. Her evidence, as reported in the press[16], was as follows.
There were other witnesses, though, who said that the Turpin who was Buckingham Joe's companion at Moretonhampstead was not the accused Edmund Galley, but an entirely different man, one with a full set of teeth.
After both accused were convicted, and the Judge was in the process of sentencing them to death, Buckingham Joe interrupted the judge, saying "I hope, my Lord, that you will not hang an innocent man; I declare before God that this man was never with me in my life". An account of Joe's hanging[17] goes as follows.
Buckingham Joe's words led to further calls for Galley's alibi to be more thoroughly investigated. His execution was postponed for two weeks, and then for another month. Then his sentence was commuted to transportation for life. Eventually, after forty-three years, he received a free pardon.
In October 1879 the Sydney paper The Evening News reported as follows[18].
Others, such as the Brisbane Telegraph, were outraged that Galley was merely pardoned, rather than exonerated[19]. After a further delay, he was awarded compensation[20].
We return now to Harriet's biography. Here is the 1841 census record for the Langbridge household.
John Langbridge | 45 | Collier | Born in Devon |
Harriett Langbridge | 35 | Born in Devon | |
John Langbridge | 15 | Born in Devon | |
Mary Langbridge | 12 | Born in Devon | |
William Langbridge | 10 | Born in Devon | |
Louisa Langbridge | 3 | Born in Devon |
Observe that Harriet Hutchings Lamgbridge was missing from her parents' household in 1841. In fact she was in London, at Carey Street, New Boswell Court, St Clement Danes, in the household of one Samuel Hutchins[22]. It is quite possible that Samuel was her mother's younger brother.
At the time of the 1851 census only three of the family were in Moretonhampstead: the parents John and Harriet, and the 20 year old William[23].
John Langbridge | Head | 64 | Charcoal burner | Moretonhampstead |
Harriett Langbridge | Wife | 51 | Charcoal burner wife | Moretonhampstead |
William Langbridge | Son | 20 | Mason (apprentice) | Moretonhampstead |
In fact, Harriet was rather lucky to be there. In February 1849 she was convicted of fraudulently obtaining a promissory note for £50 (which was subsequently cashed). She was sentenced to seven years transportation. Given that £50 was a lot of money in those days, and sentences were usually harsh, she was perhaps lucky to only get seven years. And very lucky to be released after less than two years.
The report of Harriet's trial published in Trewman's Exeter Flying Post or Plymouth and Cornish Advertiser[25] is reproduced herewith.
Harriet Langbridge, 49, was charged with having stolen from Wm Squire Rowe, of Thornbury Farm, in the parish of Hittesleigh, an interest note of the Devon and Cornwall Banking Company, for £50; the said note being the property of Charlotte Rowe, his daughter. The prisoner in this instance is a woman of plausible manners and good address; and is set forth in the calendar as being able to read and write well. The case too is peculiar; and in the absence of Mr Bird, she was defended by Mr Jerwood. Mr Cox was for the prosecution, and stated the case to the Court and jury. The prisoner is the wife of a labouring man, residing in Moretonhampstead; and Mr W. S. Rowe, the prosecutor, is a farmer, residing in the parish of Hittesleigh, a few miles distant. With this family the prisoner was intimate, and Mrs Rowe being bedridden, frequently visited them. One of these friendly visits took place soon after last Midsummer, when Langbridge told Mrs Rowe she had brought her good news, as a Miss Davis, a lady whose home was on the other side of London, but who was then lodging at Mrs Shears' in Moreton, had told her there was £20 a year for Mrs Rowe. This was by means of an annuity from a benevolent society, to which she (Miss D.) belonged. It was necessary, however, that some money should be deposited by the person who was thus to be benefitted, and, for this purpose, Mrs Rowe furnished the prisoner with £5. And, afterwards, through similar artful pretence, with £5 more. It was likewise artfully represented to the infirm old lady by the prisoner, how advantageous it would be to her daughter Charlotte Rowe, as if £50 were thus invested in her name, she (the daughter) would receive £100 on her mother's death. Thus wrought upon, Mrs Rowe gave into the prisoner's possession an interest note of her daughter's for £50, with authority to receive the amount, which was soon after done at the Cornwall and Devon Bank.
Mr Samuel Hunt, of Chagford, surgeon, the medical attendant of Mrs Rowe, stated that she is bedridden, and could not be brought to Exeter to give her evidence without endangering her life.
Mr M. W. Harvey, of Moretonhampstead, solicitor, and clerk to the magistrates of the Crockernwell division, was present when the deposition of Mrs Rowe was taken in her bedroom, and sworn before the Rev. Wm Ponsford, a magistrate, in the presence of the prisoner.
The examination was now put in and read, when Mr Jerwood objected that no offence was set out: it was an examination under circumstances in which the prisoner was charged with obtaining money, and a valuable security for money, which in itself was not an offence. The prisoner should have been charged with feloniously obtaining the money, and security for money.
Mr Cox felt the difficulty, but thought that it might be got over, if it could be proved by other evidence that when this deposition was taken, the prisoner was charged with stealing. And asked Mr Harvey if this were the case? Mr Harvey said the prisoner was charged with obtaining under false and fraudulent pretence—not with stealing.
The Chairman on this proceeded to consult Mr Bere on the point, who was presiding in the other court, and on his return said he would admit the deposition, subject to the opinion of the court above, on the point raised. But Mr Cox feeling it to be very questionable whether the deposition could be sustained, intimated that he would abandon the charge of stealing and proceed with that of obtaining by false pretences. And a verdict of not guilty was returned by the jury accordingly.
The prisoner was again indicted under these circumstances; but the deposition being read, Mr Jerwood made a similar objection, and the point was referred for the consideration of the Judges.
A stamped receipt for the £50, purporting to be signed by several ladies, the managers of a society in Exeter, and promising to give the daughter £100 for the £50 deposited, three months after her mother's decease, was read. But Mr J. H. Hutchings, of the Devon and Cornwall Bank, stated there was no such society in Exeter. Mr Massy, also a clerk in the same establishment, proved the payment of the note, but could not identify the prisoner.
Mrs Shears, of Moreton, stated that no Miss Davis had ever lodged with her.
And the jury found the prisoner guilty.
There was two other indictments against the prisoner—the one charging her with stealing the two £5 notes, and the other with obtaining them under fraudulent pretences; but, as she was already convicted, no evidence was offered on these.
The Chairman told the prisoner that under the verdict given against her by the jury, it was his duty to sentence her to transportation for seven years, but in consequence of the point reserved, he should respite that sentence until the assizes.
It is no surprise that at the assizes the judges ruled that Mrs Rowe's deposition was admissible. The conviction was affirmed[26].
According to his profile in FamilyTree on FamilySearch[27], John Langbridge died on 11 January 1858, at Market Place, Moretonhampstead. Presumably this information comes from a death certificate. Certainly the death of a John Langbridge was registered in the first quarter of 1858[28] in the Newton Abbot district (which includes Moretonhampstead), his age recorded as 75.
At the 1861 census Harriet Langbridge, a 61 year old Charcoal Burner's Widow, was living at Cross Street in Moretonhampstead, the only person in the household[29]. According to her profile in FamilyTree on FamilySearch[30] she died on 15 June 1870 at Gloucester Crescent, near Regents Park, London. The death registration record[28] says that she was 71.
Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.
Featured Female Poet connections: Harriet is 15 degrees from Anne Bradstreet, 21 degrees from Ruth Niland, 31 degrees from Karin Boye, 29 degrees from 照 松平, 12 degrees from Anne Barnard, 37 degrees from Lola Rodríguez de Tió, 21 degrees from Christina Rossetti, 21 degrees from Emily Dickinson, 34 degrees from Nikki Giovanni, 24 degrees from Isabella Crawford, 21 degrees from Mary Gilmore and 16 degrees from Elizabeth MacDonald on our single family tree. Login to find your connection.
H > Hutchings | L > Langbridge > Harriet (Hutchings) Langbridge