no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

London Witt (bef. 1800)

London Witt
Born before in Virginia, United Statesmap [uncertain]
Son of [father unknown] and [mother unknown]
[sibling(s) unknown]
[spouse(s) unknown]
[children unknown]
Died [date unknown] [location unknown]
Problems/Questions Profile manager: Cheryl Cruise private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 24 May 2021
This page has been accessed 71 times.
This enslaved ancestor's profile has a preliminary Last Name At Birth (LNAB) until a surname can be determined. Please see the US Black Heritage Naming Conventions for Slaves before merging or changing the LNAB.

Biography

London was likely born before 1800, as estimated by the fact he was deemed a man when David Witt's will was written in 1816. London was a slave held by David Witt and referenced in his will, to be inherited upon his death first by his wife, Sarah "Sally" Witt, and then by his eldest son, Dennett Witt: "Item after the death of my wife Sally Witt I give and devise to my eldest son Dennett Witt a negro man named London."

When the will is later contested, David and Sarah's son, Burgess Witt, reports to the court, "in 1820 the said Sally, widow of said David surrendered nearly the entire estate of her husband for sale and distribution among her children..." so if London were alive at that time he would have been transferred to Dennett.

Slave Owners

  1. David Witt Sr.

  2. Sarah (Abney) Witt

  3. Dennett Abney Witt

Note regarding the place holder LNAB being used in this profile: It is unknown if there were additional slave owners prior to the Witt family. The Witt name is being used currently as a place holder surname.

Note regarding age: In 1820, the US Census shows Dennett Witt holding one slave between the ages of 14 and 25, and one slave between the ages of 26 and 44, either of which could be London, if the 1820 dispersal of most of David Witt's estate had occurred prior to the census. If so, given that London must have been at least 16 when the will was written in 1816 but that he would not be older than 44 years of age, his possible birth year should fall between 1776 and 1800. Sarah still had some of the slaves in her possession at the time of the 1820 census, though not all, and had one male slave between the ages of 14 to 25, which could have been London. In any case, it is likely his transfer took place that year, as only Hannah and Bet remained in Sarah's household past 1820.

Sources





Is London your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message the profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of London's ancestors' DNA have taken a DNA test.

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.