Can we consider a policy change on content of "Current Last Name" and "Other Last Name" fields

+18 votes
418 views

Proposal to amend Wikitree policy to permit the use of numbers and punctuation marks, namely commas in the “Current Last Name” and “Other Last Name” fields.

As part of the preparation rolling out the new Scotland project, I am looking after Scottish clans and Nobility because these are my areas of expertise. I know in different parts of the world there are variations in the way names are both used and written. Even within the English speaking world there are huge variations and even here in the United Kingdom, major differences between England and Scotland. This is because most people don’t realise there is a difference between “England” and “Great Britain” or the “United Kingdom”. Scotland has in fact always kept an entirely separate legal system from England.

In Scotland, it is not as simple as someone having a Christian name (first name) and Surname (Last name at birth). There are many thousands of people who are members of noble families who will have one LNAB and then during their lifetime a range of different Surnames (current or other last names) which have nothing to do with marriage or divorce. Under Scots law, someone who is a member of a baronial family has the last name e.g. “Mackenzie of Scatwell”. His or her last name is neither Mackenzie nor Scatwell, it is Mackenzie of Scatwell. Similarly a Peer can change his name many times during his life.

Our late Prime Minister, Sir Alex Douglas Home had the following names at different times during his life!

Hon. Alexander Frederick Douglas-Home (at birth)

Hon. Alexander Frederick, Lord Dunglass (when his grandfather died)

The Rt. Hon. Alexander Frederick, 14th Earl of Home (when his father died)

The Rt. Hon. Sir Alexander Frederick Douglas-Home (when he resigned his Earldom in order to become the British Prime Minister)

The Rt. Hon. Alexander Frederick, The Lord Home of the Hirsel (when he ceased to be a member of our House of Commons and went to the House of Lords as a Life Peer. This lasted until his death. He could not simply take back his previous title 14th Earl of Home but when he died his son became the 15th Earl of Home)

His wife Elizabeth once said to me that their postman at the Hirsel (the name of the family estate in Scotland) had a hard job because she had had 6 different surnames in her lifetime but she had only ever been married to one man!

Within Wikitree, we have a number of members who are affected by the problem of how their current last name is displayed simply because as members of noble families, they do not have a “simple” last name.

Since I joined Wikitree in July 2017, I have had to merge many thousands of duplicate profiles for Scots. A great many of them were members of the Scottish Nobility and indeed ancestors or distant cousins of my own. The main reason these duplicate profiles have been created is that when a hint is given during the creation of a profile, there is nothing to point to the existence of one or more profiles for the person in question because the current Wikitree system does not permit complex current last names, particularly excluding numbers and punctuation marks.

It would greatly enhance the appearance of Scottish profiles and accurately display their names if we can amend the current last name field. If you look at the following profiles, you can see examples I have created which show up in searches. I did this to enable members of the Wikitree community to understand how it would work. I know that other projects depart from the standard rule. Currently the South Africa project policy is for all Christian names to appear in the first name field and to ignore the middle name field. The Euro Aristo project of which I am an active member, places titles in the nickname field but they do not show up in a search or among the profile prompts when creating a new profile which might already exist.

 Examples of Profile Names for Scottish Nobles:

Bethune-14: Cardinal David Beaton, Archbishop of St Andrews

His LNAB was Bethune but he was known as Beaton. Cardinal is an appropriate prefix and his title was “Archbishop of St Andrews”.  So his profile should be

Prefix: Cardinal

First Name: David

LNAB: Bethune

Current Last Name: Beaton, Archbishop of St Andrews

Mackenzie-905: Roderick Mackenzie, 1st Laird of Redcastle

His LNAB was Mackenzie. He became the 1st in the line of Mackenzies to own Redcastle making his title 1st Laird of Redcastle. Scottish Barons were landowners, not peers. So his profile should be

First Name: Roderick

LNAB: Mackenzie

Current Last Name: Mackenzie, Laird of Redcastle

In his biography it would be explained that he was the 1st Laird of Redcastle on being granted the Barony.

Mackenzie-1261: Kenneth Mackenzie, 1st Earl of Seaforth (Irish creation)

First Name: Kenneth

LNAB: Mackenzie

Current Last Name: Mackenzie, Earl of Seaforth

As numbers and symbols cannot be inserted in the Current Last Name Field, it should be made clear in his biography that he was created Earl of Seaforth as an Irish Peerage in order not to be confused with the much earlier Earldom of Seaforth granted to his ancestors as a Scottish Peerage.

Moravia-10: William Sutherland, 3rd Earl of Sutherland

First Name: William

LNAB: Moravia

Current Last Name: Sutherland, Earl of Sutherland

At the time of his birth, William’s family was known as “De Moravia” and under Wikitree project rules the LNAB should ignore the “De”. During his lifetime he and his brother more commonly used and were referred to by the surname “Sutherland”. In his biography it should be made clear that he adopted the surname Sutherland and that on the death of his father he became the 3rd Earl of Sutherland.

Sutherland-3463: Margaret Sutherland of Kinminitie

First Name: Margaret

LNAB: Sutherland

Current Last Name: Sutherland, Lady Artamford

It will be seen from her profile that Margaret became the wife of James Irvine, the 3rd Laird of Artamford. However on marriage she did not become known as Margaret Irvine, the modern practice. As her husband was the Laird of Artamford, she became known as “Lady Artamford”. Indeed in Court of Session court papers she was referred to as “Margaret Sutherland, Lady Artamford”.

There are some profiles where there are as many as 5 or 6 profile managers because so many duplicate profiles have been unnecessarily created and then merged. If you search for these individuals I have mentioned above, they can easily be identified in a name search. Over the past few days I have been merging duplicate profiles for members of the same branch of the Sinclair family, part of the noble house of Dunbeath where there were duplicates across at least 5 consecutive generations. In addition mothers were shown as wives of their sons because the duplication had caused complete confusion. This is a very common occurrence with Scottish profiles sadly.

 I have taken quite some time to create this proposed naming protocol for profiles falling within the Scotland project and ahead of this wider G-2-G discussion, have consulted leading Scottish members of Wikitree and colleagues who are widely respected genealogists and historians in Scotland, including one colleague with close connections to the Court of the Lord Lyon which is the legal authority in Scotland in all matters of genealogy and heraldry. You will realise this is a very technical area of Scots Law and there are only a small number of us who understand how these things work and in some cases provide professional services for it as well as amateur ones like here on Wikitree.

From a technical point of view, I think it would require an amendment to the coding system which would not flag up the presence of punctuation marks like commas and if possible, numbers, as “errors” in the Wikitree system in either the “current last name” or “other last name” fields.

I hope from my explanation above you can all see the merits in my proposal and consider whether it will be technically possible to make the change to the parameters for the “Current Last Name” and “Other Last Name” fields.

 

in Policy and Style by Mark Sutherland-Fisher G2G6 Mach 4 (45.5k points)

Forgive my ignorance on this, but is the "coding system" which "flags up" the usage of commas as errors actually a WikiTree coding system, or WikiTree+ error reporting (781 Separators in Current Last Name)?

If it is the later, I think this could be very easily accomplished with minimal effort and without a lot of fuss (that is just me though).

1) Current Last Name states that "For non-living people, it should be the last name they were using at the time of their death", which is in accordance with the fundamental stance that we "use their conventions, not ours." So in this case, the presence of a comma is not noted as a something to avoid, except in WikiTree+ which can be changed by Aleš.

2) Other Last Names states that "This ... can include multiple names. Separate these with commas." In this case, the comma is used to create a distinction between two variations/names. Smith, Johnson creates two individual surnames "Smith" and "Johnson". Looking at Mackenzie, Earl of Seaforth - Is the comma necessarily part of the Last Name here?

Thank you Mark for the time and effort you've put into this proposal.  I think it is a wonderful solution to the issues we experience with Last Names in Scotland, and duplication of profiles.  Thank you to everyone in the Scotland Project who contributed to the Google Group discussion as well.  I look forward to seeing whether or not the technical issues can be addressed.
I have sent this g2g discussion to Ales to make sure he is aware of it.  

I don't think Other Last Name will flag use of commas at all because I use them frequently for multiple last names.

Current Last Name will flag commas in the Suggestions, but those can be then marked as false suggestions.  Possibly Ales can change something so that suggestions don't check for commas if it is a Scottish profile, but not sure what would be the criteria for that, other than birth and death place both being in Scotland.
Hi Linda, Aleš is aware, he is awaiting for G2G discussions to decide the changes needed.
I have already raised the matter with Ales and as Steve has said, Ales awaits the collective view of this discussion. I suspect other countries and projects will benefit from being able to use a comma in the current last name. I just hope it will be possible to use this suggested layout without triggering error messages.
It's about the checks done in the browser when you hit Save Changes on the edit form.  The page won't save with invalid characters in name fields.

The last upgrade disallowed digits.  People complained at the time, but I don't know if anything has changed since then.
I checked and commas for are not flagged as suggestion on WT+ for nicknames and LNO. As I remember I synced them with wikitree onsave controls.
Thank you Ales, I assume that means they are flagged for the "Current Last Name" which is the one I am particularly keen to be able to use commas in.
I'll give it some more thought before I reply, but my initial thought is that, it's not the suggestions that are the important issue, but how the name fields are used as fields to search the WikiTree database.

For instance unless I was doing something wrong, I couldn't find William, 3rd Earl of Sutherland, by searching using the terms William in the first name field and either Sutherland or Earl of Sutherland in the last name field.  The only way that profile turned up is if I searched using the exact terms as entered eg. 'Sutherland, Earl of Sutherland'

The change that would be needed is to see the terms either side of the comma as separate search terms.
Morning John, I am somewhat flummoxed! When I originally made the trial change, in subsequent searches using "William" and "Sutherland" he appeared once I clicked on earliest birth. After reading your post this morning I tried and he didn't. I then changed his current last name to just "Sutherland" and he still didn't appear which of course he should do. I tried a number of variations matching other profiles and he still didn't appear. I could only find him when I searched for William Moravia.

As you say the most important thing is for the profile to be clearly flagged up in a simple search but I can barely work a computer let alone think about technical stuff which needs far cleverer minds than mine.
Keep in mind that sometimes changes can take a while to show up in searches when there are a queue of pages being updated by the system.
I'm confused by this conversation so maybe I missed something, but why are we adding the title to the current last name separated by a comma? As I understand it, all titles go in the nickname field. Has something changed? Personally, I would love to see a better field for titles, but that's another conversation.
Morning Emma, no need to feel confused! The administration of the Scottish Nobility is leaving the European Aristocrats project and coming under the newly establish Scotland project. I am heading up the team looking after Scottish Nobility going forward. The current Euro Aristocracy policy of using the nickname field does not serve the Scottish nobility well for a number of reasons. The 2 main ones are a) the title never shows up in a person search so we end up with many unnecessary duplicates of existing profiles and b) under Scots Law, in a great many cases, the title is part of the name, not something separate from it. I have tried to devise a new surname policy which seeks to deal with these 2 matters. The ideal solution would be a separate field into which a title could be inserted and which would show up in a person search but at present I think that is a request too far. Hope this helps, Regards Mark

Please log in or register to answer this question.

Related questions

+8 votes
2 answers
+9 votes
2 answers
166 views asked Aug 19, 2020 in WikiTree Help by Rose Farmer G2G1 (1.2k points)
+3 votes
2 answers

WikiTree  ~  About  ~  Help Help  ~  Search Person Search  ~  Surname:

disclaimer - terms - copyright

...