Contents |
There are several uncertainties concerning the standard and most widely repeated genealogical proposals about Gundred, which is found for example in Complete Peerage (CP). To summarize the uncertainty, there were three different 12th century men married to a Countess Gundred, who appears to be either the wife of Roger de Beaumont herself, or a daughter with the same name. According to the standard hypothesis of CP, the younger Gundred married two Rogers:
Gundred is not mentioned in Beaumonts in History, by Edward Beaumont and Charles Cawley treats her CP genealogy as uncertain on the MedLands website, although he also follows it.
Cawley presents the CP explanation of William de Lancaster's wife in the following way:
CP states that William Bigod's father, Hugh Bigod, married secondly Gundred ‘apparently’ the daughter of Roger, Earl of Warwick, by Gundred, daughter of William de Warenne, Earl of Surrey, and in a footnote offers circumstantial evidence.[2] Medieval Lands discusses the Complete Peerage assumptions and concludes that her parentage should be considered uncertain.[3] Wikipedia[4] names William Bigod’s mother as Gundreda, daughter of Roger de Beaumont, 2nd Earl of Warwick but gives no source information.
Thus, wikitree is following the proposal of CP and others, which is also followed in MedLands.[5] In other words, she married, firstly, as his second wife, Hugh Bigod, Earl of Norfolk, son of Roger Bigod of Earsham, Suffolk and his second wife Alice de Tosny (1095-before 9 Mar 1177), and married, secondly, as his second wife, Roger de Glanville, son of Robert de Glanville.
Publications:
GEDCOM: Gundred /de WARWICK. Birth: ABT 1130 Of, WAR, England. Death: AFT 1200. Burial: BEF 1208. Marriage: c. 1155. Husband: Hugh Bigod, 1st Earl of Norfolk. Child: Hugh Bigod
Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.
Featured National Park champion connections: Gundred is 23 degrees from Theodore Roosevelt, 28 degrees from Stephanus Johannes Paulus Kruger, 23 degrees from George Catlin, 23 degrees from Marjory Douglas, 32 degrees from Sueko Embrey, 24 degrees from George Grinnell, 28 degrees from Anton Kröller, 22 degrees from Stephen Mather, 28 degrees from Kara McKean, 26 degrees from John Muir, 20 degrees from Victoria Hanover and 34 degrees from Charles Young on our single family tree. Login to find your connection.
1. It starts by referring to what is apparently a great authority, "Beaumonts in History". Why? 2. Why are we writing about this as if MEDLANDS has superceded Complete Peerage and saying that we are following MEDLANDS? The MEDLANDS position is derived from Complete Peerage? (Saying there is uncertainty is fine, but does not make it a different position.) It seems like it could be construed as misleading? FWIW I find MEDLANDS' version of Complete Peerage also a misleading summary. Just to remind, Complete Peerage is on familysearch, and it is still the greatest genealogical one-stop source in existence for English genealogy. MEDLANDS, Keats-Rohan, Sanders, and Richardson all apparently disagree with Wikitree on this?