no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Susannah Coningsby (abt. 1628)

Susannah Coningsby
Born about in Alton, Wiltshire, Englandmap
Ancestors ancestors
Wife of — married about 1648 in Hertfordshire, Englandmap
Wife of — married 7 Apr 1656 in All Hallows, London Wallmap
[children unknown]
Died [date unknown] [location unknown]
Problems/Questions Profile manager: Robin Wood private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 11 Mar 2011
This page has been accessed 378 times.

Contents

Biography

This profile is part of the Coningsby Name Study.

Name

Name: Susannah /Coningsby/
Source: #S01836

Birth

Birth:
Date: 22 FEB 1628/29
Place: Alton, Wilts
Source: #S09611

Marriage

Husband: Robert Perot
Wife: Susannah Coningsby
Marriage:
Date: ABT 1648
Place: Hertfordshire
Source: #S01836

Sources


Source S01836
Title: Memoirs of the Chesters of Chicheley pedigree of Tyndall of Hockwold
Repository:
Note: #NS18363
Call Number:
Media: Book
Source S09611
Title: Bishops Transcripts North Mimms (Hertfordshire Archives)
  • Clutterbuck, The History and Antiquities of the County of Hertfordshire by Clutterbuck.Vol I page 445 (print page number is 524) Conisbee pedigree of North Mimms




Is Susannah your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message the profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of Susannah's ancestors' DNA have taken a DNA test.

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 4

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
The marriage to Thomas Lewin has a date/place that is for a Thomas Lewin to Susan Coinx/Conix. This cant be for this person if she had previously been married to Robert Perot. Sharing Link to parish register image on Ancestry
posted by Sarah Long
I'm not entirely convinced that Susan and Susannah were the same person. It seems to be widely repeated that Sir Thomas had six sons and twelve daughters. The pedigree in Clutterbuck (1815) vol 1 p.445 is in line with this -- six sons and twelve daughters, with "Susan" and "Susanna" listed distinctly.

Until a systematic check can be done of the detailed parish records, it may be better to assume there were two different people.

posted by James Heald
I agree indeed it is fairly clear in Clutterbucks pedigrees that there were 2 daughters - one Susan and one Susanna. I will ensure that the two sisters are properly represented
posted by Robin Wood C.Eng
Coningsby-187 and Coningsby-131 appear to represent the same person because: Clear duplicate
posted by David Mortimer

C  >  Coningsby  >  Susannah Coningsby

Categories: Coningsby Name Study